hensley skated through with zicam until it was exposed how harmful it was for some people and the company suffered greatly, and today's zicam is not Hensley's formula. and you are right in that he did it before: no clinical trials for zicam and none for emesyl
google zicam and hensley and you will see the tales of woe....
then folks will see through the lies in phoney sales and phoney reviews on amazon...I pity the fools...don't realize there are 1 BB shares o/s against no revenue
the higher they are, the harder they fall....nothing much to say except I told you so
reminds me of those times that there is a 100 car pileup from driving blindly into a fog bank on the highway, everyone knows it's a p&d, but they don't care, they think it won't hurt them......90 MM shares for pumping junk???? wow, when are those going to dump in their faces??
approcket was in the last quarterly report and several others before that, but not in the latest annual report
in the day there was some big pump about it long before Hensley showed up, why do you think the stock price was 3 - 4 CENTS????? not like triple digits with Hensley in the mix
obviously whatever the Hensleys will do with Emesyl will be on the heels of the main efforts with Migranade, the Migranade stuff is just awesome, check out their website
Hensley obviously not trying to share too much with Cheung
well we saw what happened with the so-called "letters of intent"...a total bust
"deals" do not matter, actual sales DO
ITNS will continue to hide what is happening with Emesyl under the Hensley cloak which may be boisterous but nonetheless non-transparent
eventually the stock price will depend less on the prevailing practice of the hype doctors and more about revs and earnings
but I see that most holding shares are dependent on the hype doctors to get them some little flipping fodder for p&d
The PR was issued by the Hensleys which have no stock symbol. They are the agent for ITNS but that will slice up the revenue pretty drastically I would think.
I think the product has to be represented, correct? What good are retailers without a product to see? Didn't the PR imply they were there, or were they just praising the Expo's existence??
no evidence in the list of Expo presenters that anyone relevant was there...I tried "Itonis", "Emesyl", "Hensley"
you have something? perhaps they went as "Migranade", I did not try that