NEWT just lowered the dividend forecast to 1.50 a share. And in typical fashion that tried to hide the fact by expressing it in total dollars. But bottom line is what used to be about 1.83 per share is now 1.50
Today's dividend announcement is more of the same. We're giving you a dividend next month, but we don't know how much it will be. We can tell you next week. So why not announce the dividend next week?
The whole way this transaction and the previous secondary have been handled have left me with a bad feeling in my gut. They've essentially made the $2.69 worthless. The next inkling of something that doesn't feel right I'm selling and walking away from NEWT.
I'm not quite as optimistic. I'm hoping that after the dust settles I'll be 'whole" from where I was prior to the split, and that from there NEWTEK takes off. I don't expect the dividend/split to b a windfall.
They are doing this secondary in a manner that does not inspire confidence. Why not do the special dividend first and get it out of the way, and then do the secondary. Doing it this way, leaves an impression that they are doing the secondary in order to fund the special.
Actually NEWT did specifically say the 1.82 dividend would be maintained after the special dividend. In his 2Q Results briefing they said
"We have formally announced in the release last night that our annual cash dividend of $1.82, which is being paid quarterly, will be maintained. I want to repeat this particular point because I get asked this quite a bit. The special dividend that we’re about to talk about will not affect the quarterly cash dividend. The special dividend is a one-time dividend that will be paid to shareholders of record date when it is formally declared and announced by the Board, and that is to distribute retained earnings that the Company achieved as a C Corp."
The $3.29 will have a positive impact on dividends received however. I guess no one knows the percentage of stocks vs cash but NEWT is NOT reducing their dividend rate on all the extra stock you are going to get. So you will have more income after the dividend than before.
That's what I wondering. If they want to buy back 50,000 shares do they have to buy back a share of LNCO and LINE?
So if management wanted to do a buyback, what would the logistics be? I thought that every share of LNCO was backed by a share of LINE. So could they buyback a share of (cheaper) LNCO and retire the share of LINE? Anyone know how it would work?
Very interesting concept mardermj.... in the annuity you have a guaranteed 100% loss of prinicple, but a guaranteed lower income stream. You could take the extra $25K ARR throws off every year and buy something more conservative like O at 5% and pick up a more stable $1,250 a year in dividends. So after 2 years you would have another $50,000 paying out $2,500 a year. Helps take the risk off the proposition. Every year ARR survives, you stand a greater chance of succeeding.
I used to own some Cole Real Estate. I get notice of a settlement in Polage vs Cole. It reads to me that they agreed there was no way to benefit the class holders........ But let's go ahead and pay the lawyers that sued....