Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

BB Liquidating Inc. Message Board

jeff4iam4 26 posts  |  Last Activity: Jun 24, 2016 1:21 PM Member since: Jun 29, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 24, 2016 1:21 PM Flag

    "And then,...and then,...along came Jones, slow walking Jones, slow talking Jones, tall, thin, lanky, low talking Jones"
    For any Ray Stevens fans out there....we could sure use a hero about now to pull us from this quicksand. BP, my hero!....a guy can hope....a guy can hope.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 24, 2016 11:48 AM Flag

    As for the science and manufacturing, I am still confident they will eventually bring this drug to market and it will become a cornerstone in fighting many diseases in humans. I also believe despite managements self-serving ways, they are also trying to bring this drug forward. They become hell of a lot richer getting this drug approved than they ever could by milking the company dry slowly over many years as many here believe is their purpose. That just is not true in my opinion.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 24, 2016 11:48 AM Flag

    As for the science and manufacturing, I am still confident they will eventually bring this drug to market and it will become a cornerstone in fighting many diseases in humans. I also believe despite managements self-serving ways, they are also trying to bring this drug forward. They become hell of a lot richer getting this drug approved than they ever could by milking the company dry slowly over many years as many here believe is their purpose. That just is not true in my opinion.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 24, 2016 11:45 AM Flag

    Dr.V,

    Read CP's latest response to you on IHub this morning. He makes interesting points (regarding the Bavi molecule being very large and thus creating a mushroom effect that would prevent all PS sites on a cell to be accessible. To be honest, as smart as I think I am, this one escaped me a bit as I was contemplating your point that there were just too many PS sites to attach on each cell. I still have a glimmer of respect for your knowledge of science, but it seems clear that this shows that even the smartest of people can miss a few things when reviewing other's work. The point is to find out as much information as possible....find the true facts and then determine what is really going on. of course, you still need to prove it works and admittedly, the trials have not been good to us...at least the chemo combos with the exception of the Phase 1 breast. Not that I am admitting that the NSCLC trials did not show Bavi works....they did...but the trial itself was not successful enough due to several circumstances to get FDA approval on their own. I am still on the side of the fence that Bavi works and will likely work well in I/O and the collaborations going on tell me a lot of other smart people see a lot of promise with Bavi as well. I suggest that you re-evaluate your position and quit telling other people that their research and opinions are hogwash compared to yours because you (and most everyone else) are not perfect and do not have all the information required to make a definitive statement as to whether Bavi works well or not. It could be they just need a little more work on figuring out the specifics on how to optimize it in use against human disease. I am giving them time. My only beef with PPHM is management and BOD related and their inability to communicate with shareholders and overcompensating themselves with salaries and bonuses even when things have not gone well.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 21, 2016 10:50 AM Flag

    And Vinman, to answer your question on the BLA, I agree with CP that they probably could submit it after they collect all data....but not sure that they will as the company stated that they have suspended all chemo/Bavi and will focus on Avid and the I/O combo collaborations. If they were to file a BLA, it would likely only happen if further data is gathered and if they felt there was enough there to possibly give them an advantage either in getting Bavi approved for Chemo combos or setting the stage for I/O combos in some way (safety for one). As I said before, I am on the wait and see side of the fence....well, I guess that means I am sitting on the fence trying to see where this is going. I will agree with some bashers here and say that IMO there may be a significant wauit before Bavi receives any kind of approval and thus Avid's success is key along with finding a partner for the I/O combos in order to keep the company going long term. I think they will be able to do it, but until they do, the stock price is going to remain dismal. I can wait...I invested long term in PPHM so there really isn't any change for me as I had not planned to sell any shares for several more years anyway. I have given up the dream of becoming filthy rich off of my 115,000 shares....but believe in the long run I can still do quite well. And again, I do not completely disagree with everything you said because my ego doesn't rule my thoughts as easily as some...I suggest you take a bite of humble pie once in awhile and open your mind to other possibilities rather than think you have all the answers when you really don't have much at all. There is no way with the information we have been given that you can systematically shoot down every single possible outcome other than what you have presented...you just don't know the full story....I doubt anyone does yet.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 21, 2016 10:40 AM Flag

    Thanks Wook, pretty much summed up what I was about to write "Vinman". He did twist CPs words a bit. Of course, his agenda almost requires him to because he needs to discredit people to push his real agenda, whatever that may be. And as far as his recent attack on MassH, totally off base and yeah, I don't think he has his eyes fully open to what MassH is trying to convey. I believe (in other words my opinion) that Vin is so caught up in trying to prove himself right and discrediting anybody who challenges his position about PPHM and Bavi that he automatically slants what is being said in the most negative light....to the point that yeah, he reads but refuses to understand there is a different point of view and it isn't necessarily wrong. My position that I have tried to get across to him is that he (and we) do not have all the data from the Sunrise trial and that we really have little to go on except filling in the pieces that fit what we think happed. He filled in the missing pieces by eliminating any possible outcome other than Bavi failed in the Sunrise and that is that. Others (myself included) believe that regardless of the trial not having the outcome we desired, it still worked as expected...and I do not think the company expected it not to work. However, we did not meet the standards for getting approval and likely were not going to meet them as the trial continued. And like MassH mentioned, why continue going down a path that wasn't going to really do much for your company when you can change course and continue down the new path being built by the industry. PPHM is not as dead as these guys would have us believe...and I for one am not happy with the BOD and management, but I also do not believe they are just scamming everyone with the goal of milking shareholders dry to line their own pockets.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Cloaks little brother, MassH, speaks!

    by learningcurve2020 Jun 20, 2016 12:42 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 20, 2016 1:12 PM Flag

    Not sure why you trash MassH, he is in the industry and avoids making predictions of the future. His info is clearly about processes that go on in getting a drug through trials,, marketing and manufacturing. But I suppose you bashers must leave no stone unturned to make sure everybody who does not follow your agenda is properly discredited, even if a person has actual great value like MassH. After all, there is money to be made in keeping the masses misinformed.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    1.00

    by jay_scott27 Jun 17, 2016 9:18 AM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 20, 2016 1:08 PM Flag

    Seriously? Considering this board is over run by bashers and about the only consistent long who posts anymore is the one you are bashing. There are only a few of us longs left who post occasionally...and I very rarely even rate posts....so what is your point? I can tell you that yes, almost every time a long posts, that post will receive almost all, if not all, negative ratings....because about the only ones who rate longs are the bashers. You really are a silly turd.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    1.00

    by jay_scott27 Jun 17, 2016 9:18 AM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 17, 2016 2:36 PM Flag

    Dr. V,

    Sorry, but although I am not at this point writing off your claims, I also do not agree with them either. There isn't enough information available to say whether you or CP are wrong. To make a statement that CP is a nut and doesn't know Jack is in my opinion so far off that it is laughable. I respect CP and he earned his reputation for respect better than you have in my eyes. He was the first to come out that the Phase 2 trial had been sabotaged by an employee and that has since pretty much been proven. Do I take everything CP writes as gospel?....no I gather all sources the use my own mind to decide what I believe is the truth. CP is a great source for information, so is Mass Hysteria, so was Freethemice....and even Goodjobhunting....among many others. I don't always agree with all of them, but I listen to them and constantly evaluate what they say and what I know and decide how to go forth. Hell, I even listen to your posts, negative as they are because you make challenging points that seem they could have some validity. The only trouble with your posts is that it does appear you have a deeper hidden agenda because you really ignore more than you present...but the part you always ignore are the possible points that indicate Bavi does work. It appears you have set your mind it doesn't and your agenda is to prove yourself right rather than finding the real truth. The proof of whether Bavi will work or not has not been proven by you or anyone else....we need more information....you do not have enough to make it a fact that it doesn't.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    1.00

    by jay_scott27 Jun 17, 2016 9:18 AM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 17, 2016 2:25 PM Flag

    LC,

    You miss my point. He clearly wrote "The AVID Production never produced anything then, and won't today.
    Or any time in the near future...". I don't know, but I thought I had a better than 1st grade education in reading English....because I interpret those letters he put in the form of a post to form sentences that basically state that Avid is not producing anything....that they are not creating biologic drugs in their facility. A huge number of sources (including pictures firsthand) that pretty much proves that is incorrect. If I made a error in a statement such as that, every single one of you bashers would be all over me talking about how big a #$%$ and a complete moron I am. How come he gets a free pass without a single word from you guys? A bit more interested in promoting your agenda than the truth? Yeah, that's the ticket!

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Vinny boy

    by coolhandlucy007_007 Jun 15, 2016 6:46 AM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 15, 2016 1:24 PM Flag

    Come on Bradley, get with the times! CA was dismissed....last week...or didn't you get the memo? Appellate Court confirmed original ruling. CA is over, only chance is taking this to the Supreme Court and they would not even consider looking at this bogus case...not even a 0.000000000000000000000001% chance.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    R2_D2 has Dickey Boy as his new hero!

    by jeff4iam4 May 31, 2016 3:59 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 May 31, 2016 5:43 PM Flag

    "amazingly though, boringjeffy, dickie was closer to the truth with his BK call than any of you pumpers were with your drug-induced moonshot predictions." How so Bradly? I haven't seen any evidence of PPHM going BK, have you? As a matter of contention, I could easily say that PPHM could (not that they would) become a mere manufacturing company usig Avid alone and stave off BK indefinitely more than say they will be going BK anytime soon. Just because you want something to happen badly doesn't mean it will. Dickey Boy has proven himself to be a complete idiot when predicting BK for PPHM all along, and he is still making the same idiotic predictions and you bashers continue to praise him. The facts are that PPHM has no debt, has a wholly owned manufacturing facility that appears to be profitable at best and at least pays for its operations at the least, has $50+ million in cash, has plenty of ways to raise more cash if needed (granted maybe not without a reverse split first) and has a fully owned pipeline drug that still by most people's accounts could actually be beneficial if the right people get involved through a deal or two with a BP. To me, I don't see how PPHM is that close to a BK as to say Dickey Boy is more correct. But, you go ahead and defend the classless dunce...throw him the bone he longs for but doesn't deserve because you pity the fool.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • That's right R2_D2, keep praising Dickey Boy....the guy who has been claiming PPHM would be declaring BK by end of the year for at least 4 years straight. And he was serious, no doubt in his mind. The guy is a freak of nature....a mega genius!....Not!...well other than the freak of nature...just not a good freak, more of the scary kind...more like mega moron....but you go ahead and praise his name all you want, just proves what an idiot follower you are.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 May 11, 2016 12:28 PM Flag

    DrV,

    I am going to be brief here as I have little time to post right now. First, I have a BS in Civil Engineering, but also have the equivalent of two degrees in class units as I also enjoyed studying other sciences while in school. An engineer is a scientist in the sense that we study and utilize scientific principles in our work and even do scientific research. What I mean by nature is that science is my life, I love the field and I absolutely love medicine. I wanted to be a medical doctor, but my first wife shot that down as she was selfish and thought it was more important to house and feed her and our two kids than spend 11 years through school and residency...so I was forced to choose a different field with 5 years as the time frame to complete my degree. I still enjoy medicine though and I read a lot to stay updated. I do not claim to be extremely versed in medicine and realize there are many who are far superior to me in knowledge on at least the iHub board....here not so much.

    As for your statement "What are you talking about? Did Bavi + chemo fail in mice like it failed in humans?", Bavi did not fail in humans. In every trial conducted it showed an improvement over the historical placebo arm...even the pancreatic trial showed some improvement, although it was not by a large factor. The trials may have not met their endpoints or show statistical significance, but they all showed some improvement...so to flat out say Bavi failed is a bit misleading.

    It is obvious we will not be agreeing on anything here and your pot shots at me are just a waste of yours and my time. As I said before, in time you will be proven wrong. You claim you are not wrong, but I believe you will be proven wrong in time. The scientific process doesn't always end after the first test...sometimes you need to run numerous tests and then it proves or disproves your hypothesis. I will wait.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 May 10, 2016 6:48 PM Flag

    Well DrV, everybody has their opinion. Although some of what you write may have merit, I do believe you are wrong with most and will eventually be proven to have been wrong. Not immediately, but in the coming months and years. And I am banking on it that you are wrong. Blind faith and all as you would likely believe I am basing my opinions on. I really do hope I am correct and you are wrong, not just because I make a few extra bucks, but because maybe there will be a lot of cancer patients that can get a little extra time, maybe for some a lot more time. I am a scientist by training and by my nature....so I am not flying completely blind here. I see a lot of promise...and yes I understand that it needs to be proven...why we do trials. I am in the camp that believes Bavi trials to date showed improvement and that all three major trials were not all flukes...or that shananagins were going on with the data. And maybe the I/O combos are still to be proven, but Bavi in mouse chemo combo studies so far have correlated well in human clinical studies....I have belief that they will do so with I/O as well. We will see. Hope they will partner soon to prove this....but it will not be overnight.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 May 10, 2016 4:00 PM Flag

    So glad you find me funny....i do enjoy good humor. One person's truth is another person's lie....and vice-versa. As i stated before, i do not believe PPHM is done and just waiting for the hammer to fall as many here would have everyone believe. Am i wrong?....maybe, maybe not....only in time will we know. I 100% believe Bavi will work well in I/O....but i also know they will need to partner to find out. I originally wanted PPHM to partner with the Sunrise trial, but like many thought it was worth a shot to go it alone until they got past FDA approval. I know they will have to partner now....i think they know it as well. I am hopeful a partnership deal does happen this year....maybe it won't...but it is still way too early to throw in the towel. And yes, with Avid, over $50 million in cash, and the Bavi and BB patents....yeah at 33 cents this is a buy. It is ludicrous that our share price fell this low. Yes it will likely drop more with Russle rebalance and maybe even RS if that happens, but seriously those have already been baked in....any further SP decrease will be short lived. Eventually PPHM will rise again and with a partnership deal people will still have a great chance at a great return of investment...even those that have been in for a few years. Now the people before the last RS, not so much...some will only break even at best. So, i stay invested with my 115k shares...not selling no matter what.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 May 10, 2016 12:19 PM Flag

    Not that I am admitting that I am a loser (especially as defined by the ultimate pervert moron Dickey Boy), but no...I am not gone. I am around. Don't post much as there really isn't much to say right now as we longs are in wait mode. I am looking to see what PPHM's plans are going forward. Have not sold a single share....but have not added any lately either. This board is really just a bash fest, so I don't bother reading it as much...it has gotten stale and boring with just a bunch of bashers having a jerk fest orgy. Since I am not into that nor agree with most of the #$%$ being spewed, I have lost a lot of my interest in this board. Sometime you just have to abandon the idiots and let them tend to themselves. But, I do read every iHub board post though, at least there is balance there and thoughtful discussion....and a hell of a lot less personal attacks by lowbrow idiots. By the way, this is a great price to get back in...things can turn on a dime in this industry....and when it does, there usually is little warning.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Today's Courtroom arguments

    by fiduciarydoozy May 4, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 May 5, 2016 1:28 PM Flag

    LC, please just stop. Fido said "No mention of Sunrise failure by council." Do you notice the word "failure" in what he wrote? I did. My point is that in an appeal, you cannot bring new evidence. Sunrise was not deemed a "failure" until way after the original judge ruled. And I was talking about at the time of the alleged action that the plaintiff's are suing for, not the time this was being reviewed by the first judge. You are twisting my words to make some idiot attempt to discredit me.Go ahead and twist what I wrote to make me seem like an imbecile, but I am not and your attempts will do very little to prove you are not.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Today's Courtroom arguments

    by fiduciarydoozy May 4, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 May 5, 2016 10:35 AM Flag

    Fido, you wrote "No mention of Sunrise failure by council." You are aware this is an appeal, right? They cannot bring in new evidence, certainly not evidence of a trial that wasn't even planned yet, let along started at the time of the alleged action. After reading your rants on this hearing, it is quite clear you are a bit unwilling to face that things don't look good for the plaintiff. Sorry, but this case will get thrown out...again....why? Because it was a weak case...it never should have been appealed. The original judge saw that there was nothing there because there isn't....he practically begged the plaintiff to give him something more substantial....anything...three times. Just because you want to believe testimony from former disgruntled employees who were likely getting paid for their deposition doesn't necessarily mean their version of what they think they saw and heard was gospel. People's opinions and eyewitness accounts can vary greatly due to the variability of how each person's mind works and based on that person's past experiences. People tend to think things different from what actually happened as maybe they did not see the whole picture so they rely on other stimuli to fill in the blanks from the pieces they missed. Sometimes when we do that, we end up with the wrong picture. Sorry dude, but this CA is about over....time to move on.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Trial Data

    by rabies_00 Apr 20, 2016 3:35 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 22, 2016 11:03 AM Flag

    Dr. Vodoo,

    In the paragraph prior of the same post, you wrote "What IS unethical is longs fawning over the PR then claiming it that they have no doubts or worries because it proves Bavi works, and that the Sunrise data will be the basis for FDA approval when the FDA throws out the control arm." The wording of this makes it unclear whether you are impugning the Sunrise trial or Bavi with your response towards what others believe. This is why I asked whether you believe Bavi works or not....it was unclear and I wanted to know what you thought....which is why I asked instead of directly calling you out. Had you answered yes, that Bavi does not work, then I might have dismissed you for a complete moron. Bavi does work IMO, but likely its best commercial use has still to be evaluated and approved. Most likely that will come from the I/O types of treatment.

    So, to be clear, you believe the Sunrise trial was a complete failure with no chance to further Bavi approval, but there is still a chance Bavi may be useful in I/O treatments using combo drugs?

    My take is that I don't have a clue about whether they somehow can salvage Sunrise in combo with previous trial stage data. We do not have enough information to determine what they can do. Part of me says no way, but the argument that they can is compelling if they were to discover something in the data that may sway the FDA. I am not banking on this. What I am banking on is that PPHM eventually makes a partnering deal to push forward with I/O combo trials that I believe will be successful. I am hopeful that a partnership deal will be finalized prior to the ASM or soon thereafter. Without that, it would appear that we current shareholders will likely have to suffer through another R/S and thus be further diluted to the point that the most we can hope for will be a meager profit and that will not be seen for at least several more years. And yes, I will likely wait for it and not sell any of my shares.

    Sentiment: Buy

BLIAQ
0.0119+0.0030(+33.71%)Jun 27 12:30 PMEDT