Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. Message Board

jeff4iam4 145 posts  |  Last Activity: May 2, 2015 1:13 PM Member since: Jun 29, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    PPHM YMB - What have I missed?

    by jeff4iam4 May 1, 2015 2:33 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 May 2, 2015 1:13 PM Flag

    Biodoggie, why would i blame Wook? He is one of the good guys....really good guys. Nothing to blame...he has been a straight shooter from day one.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Been away for awhile now....busy as a bee at work. What have I missed while I was gone? Haven't had time to go through post the last few days....but let me guess. Dickey is still spewing his insane rants about PPHM being delisted and going BK by end of the year, which he has been saying within months for over two years and none of his predictions have ever even come close to being true. Nitwit and LC are still ranting about inept corrupt management. A few pumpers and shorters throwning their two cents worth....although probably worth less than that. Wook is still being the Wookie he is, letting peple know the truth about PPHM and how they are progressing. A few good guys like myself in there, but not usually quite as colorful as some that stand out. And I see that CloakedProtector has graced us with his presence lately after a fairly long absence. Truly a wonderful thing for him to share his wisdom with the lower form of life that typically posts to this message board. People would do well to listen to CP, he is one of the smart ones, despite what some here would have you believe. Of course, I will make my appearence again as needed with more of my long drawn out posts defending this great and upcoming company because somebody needs to keep the newbies from being lied and manipulated into walking away from a great opportunity.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 27, 2015 10:33 AM Flag

    LC, I responded to your challenge. Not sure why my post was removed. But I did respond, so to sit here and act like I am running away scared from you is a false statement. Another one of your games?

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 27, 2015 10:27 AM Flag

    Hey Fido, so how exactly is MD's SA articles negative? Have you read them? Seems pretty positive to me and apparently thousands of others. And they are extremely well written. Methinks your bias is showing again....you might want to cover it up.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Switched Vials...An Attempt To Take PPHM Private?

    by biodoggie Apr 24, 2015 5:35 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 25, 2015 5:02 AM Flag

    Hey biodoggie, does your buddy also believe President Bush planted explosives in the twin towers and then had planes hijacked by suicidal CIA agents to fly them into the buildings....just so he could have an excuse to go to war against Saddam? This theory of your buddy is about as far fetched. See, where it really falls apart is that why would management salvage the trial and then get Phase 3 approved to start? Wouldn't it have been better to just do nothing....let the cash burn send you to BK? Doesn't matter now, PPHM is in good shape and everyone knows the drug works.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 24, 2015 5:30 PM Flag

    LC, may take me awhile, but I believe that work was done by Bungler (could have been someone else) over on IHub about a year and a half ago (around the time of the ASM when we were to vote for the BOD members)....he pulled it out of the bylaws and it pretty much said that they retain their seat with a single vote. It was not questioned by anybody but was in fact verified by several other posters. I am not a lawyer, but understand the basics....but that floored me because I had never heard of such a thing. Something to do with Delaware Corporate law. I will need to get back to you, but will not be until late next week at earliest as I have a very solid weekend planned with my grandson and my family.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 24, 2015 5:20 PM Flag

    See, now Vette poses a somewhat reasonable bash here. Why didn't management hire a 3rd party to analyze the vials. It could be they just didn't have faith that they would be able to salvage the trial enough to put the extra cost into it. It turns out that they did, but initially maybe they were not confident. Also, since PPHM had just been burned by a vendor, maybe their trust level wasn't that high to take it to another vendor. Still, not so sure the validity of the data PPHM did pull out is really what is holding the share price down. The FDA did approve it to go to Phase 3, so obviously the data was good enough and so why should the market second guess the FDA? I believe it is a combo that the company was financially unstable (they were already a going concern at that time) and acheive moderate stability by huge dilution of its shareholders....that doesn't sit well with the market. Also, I also believe there is significant manipulation by one or two large forces holding the share price down, daily messing with the share price and squashing any major run if it looks like it could run. Poor BOD reputation may play a small bit in the poor share price, but more incidental than having a major effect. The real truth is that there is no other biotech with a drug in Fast Track Phase 3 with the potential of Bavi, with a profitable manufacturing arm, that is below $500 million market cap. This stinks highly of manipulation. Unfortunately, not much we can do about it for now. On a personal note, I hope the price tanks and stays tanked for about another month....got some $40K coming to me by then and I have my eye on about 25K shares of PPHM to add to my 50K.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 24, 2015 4:08 PM Flag

    The problem is LC is that neither you, I, any one person, or all together can we change the BOD or management. They are too entrenched. I mean when you have established that a BOD member just needs one vote to retain his seat....we are stuck with what we have. So, what does that get you? It gets you that you either accept the cards dealt and hope they stay on track or you leave and go to some other investment. But to sit here day after day just bad mouthing your investment in the hopes that you can change that which cannot be changed....well, isn't that kind of another more detailed definition of insane? Like I said, I question some management decisions....some have been rather questionable and they are not that shareholder friendly...but they are on track to bringing Bavi to market. Yes, most of our hopes and dreams are in one basket at this point....a big Sunrise basket, but we are making progress and the trial for all we know appears to be doing well. Dr. Garnick set the bar with the FDA approval rather low, so it does look good that approval is coming. Risky....yeah...taking your next breath is risky....but at least it is a reasonable risky. You cannot change the BOD or management, so bad mouthing the company when they are at the cusp of actually making this company worth something is not productive. And that is why I challenge you and the other bashers. I am not even trying to shut you up per se, just trying to get you guys to show a little balance. And believe me, few of you have ever said one good thing about this company...and the few who did still tried to present it in light of skepticism....thus making the good out to be really bad....for example, saying they did acheive a goal but were late at completing the goal and barely made it to the goal and that the goal will still far short of winning the game. Well, I believe PPHM is going to win this game and I will be celebrating the victory in the locker room with champagne.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 24, 2015 2:31 PM Flag

    LC,

    That is your opinion...probably shared by numerous bashers here who fall for the same scam you MAY be using on them that you claim CP and Chris are using on the longs. It can go both ways you know. I am in the camp that I do not believe PPHM management is perpetrating a big scam here to enrich themselves. I do not believe Garnick and a host of other KOL's would be involved if there wasn't real science here, a drug that shows promise, and that management wasn't sincerely trying to get it through trials and to market. I may agree with some of you bashers that maybe they could have made better decisions to sell shares at higher prices and thereby not dilute us quite so much, but other than that....everything that PPHM is doing is within reason for this type of biotech. This type of investment is not for the impatient or weak of heart. But no, I am not naive nor am I an idiot folower. I am an extremely intelligent individual who has done his homework on this company. There are things I like and some I don't, but I LOVE the science and drug we have. If management gets this to market (and I think they will) I am going to be smart and wealthy....and because cancers are the leading cause of cancer in my family history, I just might be saved by it in combo with other drugs. I can be patient, but I don't have the patience to listen to you degrade some very nice and intelligent posters because you don't happen to believe in what they post. And yes, I will come down to your level because I believe you do a disservice to newbies who don't know any better. I have been burned by people like you. Rom and Hass deal with DOW comes to mind. Owned a lot of it and when DOW was having trouble figuring how to make good on the deal to buy R&H they agreed to, many bashers like yourself on poster boards wore me down....I sold for a small loss instead of a $90K payday....only 4 weeks later the deal went through and I sat on the sidelines. Because of listening to bashers.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 24, 2015 1:15 PM Flag

    LC, Wow, delusional. Most of what you claim of CP is not truth. I have read about every single CP post for over thwo and a half years. CP's post are based, as he says, on projected enrollment. He made no further claims than that from my memory. There are little pieces of evidence, mostly heresay, that backs up that enrollment is going according to plans. But I do not ever remember CP stating that enrollment is now a solid particular number, he in facts always states that they are projected. As for the sabotage, there are wide and varying positions on that. A lot of it lies within the individual definition of sabotage. By the dictionary definition, what JB did was in fact sabotage. However, motive and any bribe she may have received are not proven...and probably never will be as the people who likely paid her off (if there are any) are not going to leave any trails. CP has been spot on in his posts regarding that situation and just because you and your fellow bashers disagree doesn't exactly throw any red flags against CP as your trustworthyness is definately in question. besides, CP hasn't been the one touting the FBI are investigating the sabotage. He is saying that JB was responsible, that CSM likely tried covering up her error (or sabotage) and that there could very well be big money backing her. I don't see anything that would refute that scenerio, but I can see alternative theories being created. But then we all have our theories....CP has his, I have mine that isn't much different that CP's, and you and many others have yours. Who is correct? Nobody will probably ever really know. I am not even sure why we still talk about it much. If BP or a hedgefund was involved, we will never find out who it was. CSM is responsible for screwing up the trial and I wouldn't give much creedence to their lawyers as they are just doing their best to limit damages. PPHM will be compensated, but we won't know for how much until much later. CP is a good guy.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 24, 2015 11:33 AM Flag

    What is wrong with you guys?...seriously, is it an ego thing? Or is it just that you cannot stand competition and CP threatens your ability to disuade people from investing in PPHM? One thing about CP, when he is wrong (and he isn't wrong often) he comes out and admits it. I haven't seen a basher here yet who admits they were wrong. And before you guys throw in that your track record has been steller because the SP proves it...I do know some of you were calling Bavi a placebo, that it would never get to Phase 3 after the Phase 2 problems, that they would be bankrupt within the end of the years 2012, 2013, 2014,...etc. Yet few of you, if any, even talks about your mistakes and failed predictions. You bashers are pathetic. Anybody who listens to your drivel deserves not gaining extreme profits when that happens....and it will happen for those who stay long and strong and who ignore your rantings and false misleading statements.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 24, 2015 10:25 AM Flag

    Learnincurve,

    You are so full of BS!!!! You really want to sit there and pass judgement on what a person believes or not based on the length of their posts? By that reasoning, nobody here believes less than I do....and last time I checked with my brain, I pretty much believe in Bavi and PPHM 99.99987% (or thereabouts). So on a personal level, your statement is really just crap. I believe we post long posts because we have so much to say because we have to get the information through a bunch of dunderheads like yourself. On one hand you bashers ask for proof when we use short posts to make a statement, then when we post long you say we doubt our own posts. Wow!.....really? Lucky for those of us who enjoy writing, we don't have to give a crap of whether you care how long our posts are. You have all the right in the world to ignore or pass up reading them. Really, all I see when I read your post on CP and his lengthy posts is a hack job attempt to discredit a very bright man who really has provided a lot of information regarding this company and its drug platform. And one big thing stands out in my mind, you haven't provided Jack as far as any useful information. In comparison, you are a complete moron compared to CP. But rest easy, you are still far more intelectual that Dickey Boy.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Think A "Tender Offer" Could Happen?

    by biodoggie Apr 23, 2015 2:09 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 23, 2015 6:08 PM Flag

    First if all Ivstations, i am not in the camp that a tender offer will be made for PPHM anytime soon. Nobody would be able to justify the selling price PPHM would command to their shareholders while the sp is currently this low. Best a BP could do is a partnership with first rights to buy later. PPHM has a low share price now and as its drug is approved, partnerships and high share prices will follow....just like PCYC and many others. These people touting tender offers and buy out rumors are just hopeful but not very well informed traders. The Genetic deal is a good model we will likely follow in my opinion. You keep harping about the current share price like it is set in stone and will never change. Pretty short sighted of you in my opinion. Share prices for small biotech that get approval commonly go up in large multiples of where they were. It is not a static situation....but rather very dynamic. The problem is that the wait could be long....very long. However, in our case i believe we are not going to need wait too much longer.

    On a side note, i may be coming into some money in mid to late May....about $40k. I like the odds of putting it all in PPHM and then spinning that biotech wheel. Odds look very good to me.....astronomical !!!!

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    When did Wook takeover the IHub board?

    by immaterial10 Apr 22, 2015 12:46 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 22, 2015 5:00 PM Flag

    You missed my point regarding PCYC. Look at the price history. About three years ago they also were under $2 for years. They broke out and are now about $250 a share. They didn't suffer from sabotage of their trials. What my point is you can't sit there and say that because the market says you are worth under $2 a share you will not amount to much. PCYC sat under $2 for years and they moved up and as you said are worth almost $20 billion. PPHM has the same or better potential, but their time isn't quit here yet due to their setback

  • Reply to

    When did Wook takeover the IHub board?

    by immaterial10 Apr 22, 2015 12:46 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 22, 2015 1:27 PM Flag

    Yeah vette, Let's just ignore the science, the Phase 2 NSCLC move to the FDA fast track Phase 3 Sunrise trial. All that is just bull dung! The market is always correct....always....right? That is why PCYC and many other drug companies were always at $200+ a share, never sitting below $2 for years on end! Oh wait......

    People like you with your blinders on will never get it. Biotech stocks build on the science through the trials. Scientific evidence shows that Bavi works and works well in combo with other drugs. The only thing keeping PPHM down is that they have not yet recieved approval and that they have not solved their long term cash flow issues completely. However, that will be coming soon, very soon and then the market will correct. Trying to make the case that PPHM is never going to amount to anything because the market doesn't value them highly now is complete and utter nonsense. To believe that just shows you are ignorant of biotech stocks and how it works in relation to the market. Clueless....you are purely clueless....or at the least deceptive and manipulative.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 20, 2015 12:29 PM Flag

    Again IV, we do not know why management doesn't excercise their options. maybe they are waiting for the big rise and maybe there are tax implications for them to wait. Maybe they don't have the cash right now or would rather that cash work elsewhere for them until they are closer to the finish line. My position has been for awhile that the price will fluctuate for awhile and the market isn't going to help us much until major news comes along....partnership or approval. As I explain in many of my posts, the big money comes more like in two to three years....the astronomical money is about 7 years out. However, this under $5 sp may not last much longer....that could leave us relatively soon...maybe even by end of this year.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 20, 2015 12:25 PM Flag

    Not to worry IVstations, PPHM is not late to the party, it is doing just fine. This new competitor isn't going to cause us much of a problem as news is starting to come out about it. The more we hear, the less likely it will affect PPHM at all....except that maybe Bavi will help their drug work better....as all cancer therapys will eventually need Bavi to make them work better. Microsoft of biotech....has a good ring to it, doesn't it? Like MS, it was needed for the computer to make it work productively, was only a partial cost of the computer system, but was universal to all computers and included in all of them (excluding Apple which was a very small market) and MS became one of the largest companies in the history of the world. Yep, the Microsoft of biotech...sounds awesome...can hardly wait. And here I am with only 50K shares....I guess that will be enough.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 20, 2015 12:18 PM Flag

    I guess you would know hat makes a bad con artist, being as how you are a professional at it. No, neither naive or a con artist. Just a humble (although that may be questionable to some) guy who does his research. When I post, you would be wise to listen. However, if you have invested in hopes the PPS drops, I guess I can see why you would try to continue to persuade people not to invest in this company. Love you bashers, all negative and no positive....that shops severe bias and that makes you unreliable. People like me who will post both positive and negative and show where the balance lies, we are more trustworthy. At the least, everyone knows my financial position. Few bashers will announce theirs....deceptive for some reason.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 19, 2015 3:20 AM Flag

    That bomb shell may be a dud. We don't have enough info quiet yet to understand if we need to be concerned or not. Bungler over at iHub posted the safety profile....not good as it can cause the body's immune system to attack its own organs. We also don't know how much better they did....was it a little or a lot. Worse case is PPHM will have to do a new trial using this new drug in combo....and that would mean a heck of a lot of dilution or they just might have no choice but to take a partnership that gives up a good chunk of our company. We longs will still get rich, just not as astronomically rich and it may take longer. However if this other drug is just a little better and we even come close to numbers we saw in Phase 2, we will have nothing to worry about....especially with our great safety profile and that our drug actually lessens the bad side effects of the drug we combo with. Hopefully soon we can get more info before freaking out. So girls, stop getting your panties in a bunch and relax. The sky is not falling and we are still on solid ground.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Who Knows What Went into the Vials?

    by antwan_rockamoora Apr 15, 2015 2:04 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Apr 15, 2015 6:19 PM Flag

    Not sure what is inappropriate about manufacturing and supplying the drug. Of course, not many small biotechs have that manufacturing ability. But what is inappropriate about it? I maybe would agree that CSM would have been well served by testing the drug vials on a random basis to make sure that the correct amount of drug was delivered...but I am not sure that is their contractual duty...maybe it is the trial sites? Doesn't matter as that again isn't the issue here. Regardless, not really sure how PPHM would have an advantage by not supplying the drug at the correct doses. I don't see where that would help them gain approval....and that they would jepardize a trial that cost them multiple millions when they knew that it had a pretty solid shot at getting to Phase 3 on its own merits. Can't you bashers just accept that PPHM has a good drug and that they are trying to get it approved? I get it that you guys think management and the BOD sucks....but does that mean every aspect of PPHM sucks? Does Garnick suck? Did Dr. Thorpe suck? I mean come on, really??....there isn't a single positive about the company or the drug? Sheeze Luise.....I swear if I could, I would hit you all in the noggin with a rubber mallet and knock some sense into you.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

CLDX
25.16+0.420(+1.70%)May 4 4:00 PMEDT