cuz if this gains 20 its gone and a double from there will just smoke the shorts. the article the shorts are now saying an attempt to pump is exactly what many thought about the questions how they were slanted for a no vote. its up to Big Janet now one way or the other and those going short here could be wiped out as the risk is to the upside imo.
due to the close vote on Q 2 regarding AA and Woodcock's leaning favorably toward SRPT. Dont count it out yet, FDA passed that womens viagra with questionable efficacy and safety concerns and there are no safety concerns with ETEP.
LOL...here we go Article was Excellent Janet knows the game and knows the questions were skewed to NO and tons of pressure for AA let the shorts fry
I agree, if you look how news has been handled over the past several months in every instance its been in favor or the shorts. Early release of BDs crushed pps, the snow delay, then release BDs without questions only to release the questions the next day after the pps is crushed again and then to have the questions asked in a manner that would leave almost no other way to answer but NO...now right before PDUFA again a delay with NO time given, 1 month, 2 months 6 months or more...killed the options holders, stock up just a bit could easily fade with NO time given..how Convenient of the FDA. something is going on and it stinks...big time manipulation of the pps.
I have NEVER read BD's that are positive so thats not happening. However, should they be less harsh than previous and address the new data and we see voting questions the pps is going UP!!!!!!!!
the way the pps is moving today. This could really put the squeeze on and panic some weak hand shorts...next week different story but this week its all about the GREEN Squeeze
its exactly what many of us are thinking and even those at Adcom that had to vote were thinking...they had their hands tied....excellent article...
is it possible that instead of AA it could lead to full approval or is that only wishful thinking since no Ph3
nice but it was $40 in January before the PPS got torpedoed by the early release on a Friday of the highly suspect BDs......I for one think that the BD's will be the same with an amendment added. Sure hope this is wrong after so many holes have been shot thru the last ones...but again maybe its not a bad thing for the old BDs to stand as I would be sure SRPT management is ready for any argument brought up in those BD...time will tell......
dont be surprised if your sources are wrong. I would luv to see the BDs readdressed and rewritten but suspect it may be just an addenda to the original. This could be good tho as so many holes were blown thru the original.
my gut feeling is right there with you due to every thing that has happened in the past several months has favored the shorts and crushed investors. now why would the briefing docs been released early on a friday into opex....then after snow delay and pps recovered somewhat but only 50% of what it lost would briefing docs be released with No questions and have the pps crushed again only to have the questions released the next day and phrased in a way that would most likely lead to a No answer....hmmmm multiple holes shot thru fda analysis major pressure by many parties and now a delay with no time frame given...now why not say we should know within the next 60 days and set a firm date...again sticks it to the longs imo....i have never seen another co get so manipulated by the fda as soon as they stand up get punched in the face come to their knees and get kicked in the chin then lying on the floor beaten with a stick...die already they say die...then farkas finds out woodcock will approve and he has a fit or so it seems, seems more personal than science imo.
I have dealt with people similar to Farkas, their minds are made up no matter what is said or presented. No matter if overwhelming data is given their mind is made up. Hopefully the board can speak out put him in his place...
arent you the same guy that had the bottle of wine contest a few years ago on a bio it failed and you mocked folks cuz you got out and made bank...seems i remember the name and what a jerk you were to people....now you come here trying to spread your words of wisdom...get lost drink your wine...cya
at least they are asking for data, if not for the political pressure id bet they just say no get lost try again in a few years....
Amazing the FDA news again plays to the shorts crushing pps. Just like Briefing docs killing pps early release, then after snow delay released again with NO questions killing pps then the next day put out questions that were written for a NO. The the AA use vote was so close must have sent the Farkas crowd into a panic and the pps way up...so what do they do, release new regs and crush the pps AGAIN...just another instance of the FDA stickin it to SRPT and Longs.
WHo knows...I didnt think it would come back when it broke 21 a few weeks ago...anything is possible...but the buying pressure is rising and squeezing the shorts forcing them to reshort higher...
Seriously, ICPT ran 40+ points into the event, the Adcom vote was expected based on BD's and the drug voted on is great but nothing stellar.