According to the Associated Press, the Lois Lerner emails have proved that the Institute For Right Wing Victims is nothing less than an extremist left wing sham of an organization that was granted 501 (c) (3) status, that was directly approved by Tovarisch Ms. Lerner. It was fast-tracked through the IRS with no investigation whatsoever. Referring to the "Institute", comrade Lerner claimed in one email: "The best thing you can do is just let them finish, sort of like when my dog humps my leg."
According to these emails, right wing victims were given a shovel ready job in the potato fields of Utah.They were forced to dig taters inside a 12 foot high fenced in, and adorned with barbed and razor wire, potato field with speakers blaring re-education dogma such as: "You didn't build that!", or "Don't let anyone tell you that it's corporations and businesses that create jobs!." "Cold hearted free market capitalist types" that have "more than they will ever need" were also repeatedly vilified. It seems that the Institute For Right Wing Victims was funded opaquely through ACORN and The Clinton Slush Fund, and thus ultimately, Al Sharpton, Barry Oblowme and the Federal Government. As right wingers, the Institute's victims were non-compliant with liberal ideology, and thus looked down upon and tortured, as domestic trouble-makers. Said the dejected head of the Institute, Mr. Mike Talovoy after the revelation, "We tortured some folks."
It is doubtful that there will be any repercussions for Mr. Talovoy as U.S. District Attorney Loretta, "I'm gonna Lynch me some white folks, claimed": "I don't see where any laws have been broken. Mr. Talovoy is an exemplary example of what is needed, and best, for Amerika." As long as no African-Americans were forced to dig potatoes, then I can't see where a crime has been committed. Actually, we need more Institutes like Mr. Talovoy's."..... More as the story develops.
Napolitano has also made the euphemism "America is a melting pot" taboo. By uttering this microagression, one is implying that minorities should "assimilate to the dominant culture" according to the Alethia of political correctness.
Nietzsche spoke of ressentiment (resentment in today's English) as the psychology of blame. It basically blames the failures and hardships of the have nots on the successes of the haves. "It is a theory of morality that says the success of the successful is proof of their wickedness." It is the allure of ressentiment that that makes it possible for a blond-haired, blue-eyed, freckle-faced, white girl to re-invent herself and become an oppressed black woman, such as Navin (I was born a poor black child), er, Rachel Dolezal.
pardon the common sense, but..."“I am for doing good to the poor, but…I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. I observed…that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.”
It's tough getting around the old one drop rule,huh? :~o
"anti-racist" is code for anti-white.....
Janet Napolitano, the paranoid and ever-obsessed with right-wing extremism, erstwhile Secretary of Homeland Security is doing her best to raise the bar on political correctness to a new level of insanity. Yes, the lady who led DHS and was sued by one of her employees in a Federal Court for discrimination against males under her charge, and settled out of court for $175,000 is now the President of the University of California system.
Napolitano has instituted "speech codes" throughout the university system.Her codes are aimed at eliminating "microagressions" against minorities. Under her speech codes, educators will not be allowed to use phrases such as: "America is the land of opportunity" because it victimizes students with the "myth of meritocracy". No, we can't have our little snowflakes being victimized by the dreaded myth of meritocracy. Other sayings that have been deemed unacceptable include: "Everyone can succeed in this society, if they work hard enough", or "Where are you from,or where were you born?", and that disgustingly repugnant lie, "Affirmative action is racist". All of these statements are considered microaggressions, and as such, simply cannot be tolerated in the university system. Apparently, Janet the discriminator, believes that free speech can be trumped by political correctness when it comes to education, or better yet, the re-education of the minds of young people, who right-wingers are hell bent on victimizing. Those evil right-wingers must be stopped at every turn from trying to tell our little babies, that took a village to raise, about the myth of meritocracy.
First off, we're not talking about the homicide rate. We're talking about mass murders by gun. Don't change the subject, Nancy. I stand by my statistics, and until you can disprove them, then you are engaging in the typical liberal act of "gaslighting". In fact, I accuse you of a microagression against me with your post, by even mentioning man made climate change. That's the way you leftists are, always microagressing and accusing your enemies of the same.
Once again, Obozo uses a tragedy to push for gun control.
"Now is the time for mourning and for healing, but let’s be clear,” he declared “At some point, we, as a country, will have to reckon with the fact that this type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries. It doesn’t happen in other places with this kind of frequency. And it is in our power to do something about it.”
Perhaps he has forgotten the recent attack in Paris on Charlie Hebdo where 16 people were gunned down, or the shooting of 77 people in Norway by Anders Behring Breivik in 2011. Obviously, he is unaware that statistics show that in the U.S., people killed in mass murders by gun averages 10.6 per year. In Europe the figure is12.5 per year.
He also has his race pimp, I mean czar, on his way to Charleston to stir things up and complain about white violence against African Americans. The liberal rag Salon has already stated that: " White right-wing domestic terrorism is one of the greatest threats to public safety and security in post 9/11 United States of America.”
"We're going to have to change how our body politic thinks, which means we're going to have to change how the media reports on these issues." Barry Soetoro speaking at Georgetown University on poverty....Lenin and Adolph would certainly approve...
"There’s a different leader in Syria now. Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe he’s a reformer." -- Hillary Clinton on tyrannical maniac Bashar Assad
“With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?” ~Hillary Clinton
"No. We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices ... Government has to make those choices for people." – Hillary Clinton speaking on healthcare
“Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs.” -- Hillary Clinton
"If you have guns in your home, tell your parents to keep them away from you and your friends and your little brothers and sisters." -- Hillary Clinton to middle school students
Here's a couple more from your hero: “Many of you are well enough off that the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” – Hillary Clinton speaking of the Bush tax cuts.
You know, we can’t keep talking about our dependence on foreign oil and the need to deal with global warming and the challenge that it poses to our climate and to God’s creation and just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.” – Hillary Clinton
"We are at a stage in history in which remolding society is one of the great challenges facing all of us in the West." -- Hillary Clinton per Barbara Olson's Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton
It seems pretty obvious that you will be voting for H-- illary in 2016. Admit it, you get a stiffy just reading her Marxist quotes......
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.” — Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002
You think Hillary should get one of those "property of Bush Dynasty" tattoos?
Ok, Tal. Once again you come rushing to battle with the unfurled banner of partisanship and your always-assuming attitude. My post has nothing to do with partisanship. It has to do with the ethics of she who would be President. Apparently, ethics don't matter to you, or her lack thereof can be justified by going back years to point out a lack of ethics by a "right winger". In your world apparently, Cheney's lack of ethics gives Hillary a pass to be just as unethical. Mind you, this is just e pluribus unum of Hillary's ethical and moral failures. You seemingly believe that we can put a dollar amount on ethics. Cheney's transgressions were of a higher dollar value so Hillary's selling of favors is just "nickel ante" stuff.
Yes, you are ever assuming. You constantly assume that if someone says anything negative about Obama or Hillary, then that makes them a hard core, right wing, Tea Party, George Bush lover. You seem to be living in a black and white world, a juvenile world where gray does not exist. What makes you assume that I was good with Cheney or Bush, for that matter? Sorry Tal, but I have never voted for George W. Bush. My opposition to Hillary and Obama does not convict me of being a right winger. They are simply the criminals de jour. I notice you had nothing to say when I took the Republicans to task for "going all Pelosi" on the TPP last week. I have told you numerous times over the last few years of my Libertarian beliefs, but you apparently believe that everyone is either a Democrat or a Republican, there is no middle ground. If one is a Republican then he HAS to be anti-abortion, right? If one is a Republican then he MUST be a God-fearing Christian, right? Personally, I think both parties suck, but the current Fool On The Hill, and she who would be, are what Miltz said below: "two of the dirtiest political hacks this country has every had." The key words being "two of."
For those that are unaware, he is the largest individual contributor to the Clinton Foundation. He is the fourth wealthiest man in Ukraine. He owns Interpipe Group. North American Interpipe Inc. is his North American subsidary. Under Hillary's watch as SOS, she allowed him to contravene U.S. sanctions against Iran by shipping 1.8 M dollars in 2012 worth of gas and oil piping, as well as railroad parts to Iran , and roughly the same amount in 2011. Funny, the sanctions say that an invoice (under the sanctions) can not exceed one million dollars in product. What kind of "sanction" is that?. Yet he nearly doubled that, twice, and he got a pretty Christmas card from the Clinton Foundation. Sorry, but that smells like treason in the garbage can...
Why did the Clintons create a "pass-through" company, WJC, LLC? I know, rhetorical question.
Why did Hillary Clinton violate the memorandum of understanding she signed with the Obama administration promising to disclose all donors, including the foreign head of the Russian government’s Uranium One, Ian Telfer, who funneled four donations totaling $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation that were never revealed?
Why did Hillary Clinton allow top investors in the Keystone XL pipeline to pay her husband $1.8 million to deliver 10 speeches, even as she quietly shepherded an environmental impact study through her State Department that (surprise!) proved largely supportive of the pipeline?
Why did Hillary Clinton deliver eight speeches totaling $1.6 million in speaking fees paid for by two of the largest banks tied to the Keystone XL pipeline (in addition to the $1.8 million Bill bagged for the 10 Keystone investor-funded speeches he delivered during Hillary’s tenure as Secretary of State)?
It's comedic, and yet sad at the same time how people will support this Canklesaurus based upon partisanship and/or gender. Despite her outright dishonesty, arrogance, and despicable chameleon nature people will still vote for this elitist, power-hungry wench. She is the gold standard of flawed candidates, and has more baggage than Hartsfield Airport. Go figure.
Sorry Dilbert, but you're off base. I live in one of Florida's most sparsely populated counties. The closest town is 15 miles away. The closest city is about 50 miles away. Nope, no city boy here. Born on a farm- still live on one. Also not anywhere close to broke. I live rather comfortably. I just don't go around bragging about how much money I have on message boards. People that do, generally seem to be the biggest liars. Speaking of cities, Orange, Brevard, and Osceola counties are pretty heavily populated, extremely populated to where I live, and they have some good sized cities.
But, but Barry said this was a "job creation bill," yet the house voted down a measure that would have provided financial assistance to those who lost their job because of this "free trade" bill. I guess all those jobs to be created were in Asia. At any rate, despite the Republicans going all Pelosi, passing it without knowing what is in it, better sense seems to have prevailed. It's hard to know though as the most transparent administration ever kept the whole thing under lock and key in a government basement building. Only a handful of Congress were allowed to read it, one part at a time after surrendering their cellphone and signing an agreement to speak to no one about what they had read. They're all criminals.