I know, the truth hurts..... nice shot with the "hateful vitriol".... Melisa Harris-Perry would approve...Just follow the Judas goat and shut your bleating mouth...
is run by a wannabe dictator that wishes America to experience pain, preferably and especially, demographically...living out the dreams of Frank Marshall Davis.. How many Sundays would you attend a church where the preacher constantly said GD America? How many? You think he's prescient? Speaking in liberalese, he's a hater....
Maybe Fox News should moderate the next Democrat "debate" er, Hillary national butt licking festival....Yeah, that should work... IGM6624 is a total blithering idiot.....and a fool that lets Melissa Harris-Perry tell him ( or it, just trying to be PC) what to say and think....
Further, if you believe that conservative groups were not targeted by the IRS, and that everything was handled on the up and up, then why would Lerner destroy all of her e-mails and plead the Fifth. If you've done nothing wrong then you can not incriminate yourself. Why not take the opportunity to prove your innocence when it was afforded to you? You know it smells, I know it smells, everyone knows it smells, but it's kind of like a fart. You can stand your own, but not anyone else's.
Sorry, but the number of conservative leaning groups forced to jump through hoops for exempt status far out-weighed the number of liberal groups made to do so. That is a fact. It is you my friend that has the confirmation bias and that is well recorded on this site. As for the love of your life, Hillary Clinton, it seems that as much as Jarrett and Obama would love to torpedo her campaign, they simply cannot. One, they would come tumbling down with her too, and Two, who would run for the democratic party in 2016? Bernie? Obama needs a democrat like Hillary that will keep intact all the #$%$ that he has initiated. Bottom line though, if you don't think these people are criminals than you live in your own little fairy tale.
Surprise, surprise. The DOJ today closed the Lois Lerner investigation and there will be no charges.
The probe found "substantial evidence of mismanagement, poor judgment and institutional inertia leading to the belief by many tax-exempt applicants that the IRS targeted them based on their political viewpoints. But poor management is not a crime."
"Institutional inertia", what a crock. Poor management, bull feathers. Those are some serious allegations. So serious that you might want to plead the Fifth Amendment if accused of such, and you might want to delete all of your e-mails that prove your institutional inertia. This banana republic has gotten so corrupt under the current administration that it seems as if all government employees are 100% above the law. The law is for the "little people", it seems. Obama, Lerner, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Jon Corzine and John Koskinen, just to name a few, are all criminals, and due to their wealth and power positions all have immunity from U.S. law it appears.
Using the IRS to destroy your enemies was one of the main charges against Nixon. The Obama administration has taken it to a new level by not only selecting enemy individuals such as Wayne Alan Root for audit, but also groups of people eligible for tax exempt status. Is it any wonder that Obama has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all previous presidents combined? Is it a surprise that he has used his power to harass journalists and entire news organizations? That he covered up his scat-covered trails of walking guns into Mexico by claiming executive privilege? Yeah, transparency my butt. Criminals. They all deserve their own private lamp post to swing on.
you are, perhaps, the most ignorant moron to adorn this board, ever. Take your straw man arguments and leave...How many died under LBJ's undeclared war in Vietnam, which we still pay 22 million a year for? All because of falling dominoes? Your government doesn't care who died, and how they died as long as it doesn't disrupt their power-hungry gutless lives.. You obviously are as gutless as they are.Punk..
Check your facts (I know facts don't matter to you libbies). There were 13 attacks but only 3 of the 60 dead were Americans. This is per your liberal Poltifact organization. Christopher Stevens was the first ambassador killed since the 1970's. And in none of those cases did the government come out and lie to the U.S. public and claim that the attacks were due to some phony video. That is why the investigation. If Hillary and Obama had told the truth and promised to hunt down those who perpetrated those acts, we would not be having this discussion. But they had to cover their incompetence with ridiculous lies. But then, that's all we get from this administration...lies...
This past Wednesday, Trey Gowdy responded to a letter from Elijah Cummings with his own letter that totally destroyed Cummings and his repeated efforts to deny the families of the dead at Benghazi from knowing the truth of the circumstances.
Now, due to confirmation bias, I hardly expect many left wingers to actually read the letter. That and the fact that it is 13 pages long will scare most lefties away. However, the letter is extremely well composed and written, and offers much new insight into the sordid story of Hillary, S. Blumenthal, et al and their verified actions in Libya that led to the destruction of the Benghazi consulate and the death of four Americans therein.
A simple google search "Trey Gowdy calls out ranking Dem on Benghazi" will lead to numerous articles which include a link to the PDF file. It is, for sure, excellent reading and very informational. The stench is becoming unbearably disgusting, and Cummings can't stand to see truth uncovered by the committee.
you are a gutless wimp...like most liberal LGBT idiots...Go crawl back under your rock you moronic salamander...
Have you got goose-stepping down yet, you punk fascist? And while you're at it, what about LBJ's fake Gulf of Tonkin incident to deeply involve us in Vietnam so he and his cronies could make millions? We still pay over 22 billion a year in compensation for Vietnam (more than the FBI budget)..an undeclared, unfunded war. And yet YOU want to cry about Medicare Part D by Bush? Are we not still paying for LBJ'S original Medicare and Medicaid?. Yeah, I know, that doesn't count..Everything that you believe in is garbage, but you can not learn to think for yourself. Go stump for Hillary, you freaking buffoon.
No, that's not what I am saying at all. I'm saying that you, with your stated purpose in life to hate people that don't believe in your horse excrement, must be having a a freakin hissy fit over some liberal college survey that says more people trust Fox News, (that would be Goebbels News to you) than the Rachel Maddow garbage that take your shoes off for, bend over in the street when the bell chimes, and pray to, Yeah, I know, her voicing of the news is the prettiest sound on Earth to you.Personally, I don't watch any of the stupid channels. I don't need to. My TV is for sports. I don't care what any TV talking head has to say. Funny, but if you check out the survey, Northeastern liberals trust Fox more than your Allah Rachel.
"According to the poll by Suffolk University, Fox was the most trusted news source by 23% of respondents. The second most trusted was CNN at 15%, while NBC placed a distant third at 10%. Only 5% of viewers found MSNBC to be the most trustworthy. The only sources to perform worse were Comedy Central and C-SPAN. Yes, even Jon Stewart’s final hit pieces were more virtuous than whatever tirade Rachel Maddow is on right now. Looks like MSNBC’s reliability has caught up with its ratings in the race to the bottom."
Suffolk University, that bastion of liberalism with its motto "Honestas et Diligentia" obviously did their due diligence and is being honest. They have to be fair with that motto. The poor owner of the Institutefor rightwingvictims. This should kill him. It will start with a wild, object-throwing, uncontrollable rage, and will progress to a mouth-foaming, teeth-gnashing, palpitating, clonic seizure that will probably result in the poor boy's entry into the nearest psychiatric ward where he will spend the remainder of his days heavily sedated in a padded cell, with or without the straight jacketdepending upon his mood, drooling and screaming :Rachel! Rachel Rachel!
On another note, Russia has already begun airstrikes, and immediately the U.S. is claiming that the strikes were directed at U.S.-backed rebels attempting to overthrow Assad, as opposed to ISIS. The Wall Street Journal is claiming that the rebels attacked were in areas that ” are largely dominated by relatively moderate rebel factions and Islamist groups like Ahrar al-Sham and the al Qaeda affiliate the Nusra Front.”
So now our administration wants us to believe that al Qaeda is “relatively moderate”? Really? And just who in the name of Sam Shitsky did the administration think they were going to strike? Putin already made it abundantly clear that they were involved to help Assad maintain power first and foremost. That means ISIS and the Obama-armed Syrian rebels. What’s the moron going to do now? Draw another line in the sandbox? Maybe he should just pick up his toys and go home. Leave it to those that really have a plan.
Putin stands for Russia’s interests globally as opposed to being a global social justice warrior like Obama attempts to be. Obama’s feckless foreign policy, especially in the Middle East, is little more than reckless global community organizing. He despises wealth and power, especially in the hands of pro-Western countries in the region.
From his misguided efforts in Libya and Egypt to his mistakes in Iraq and Syria, he appears to have little foresight into the future beyond his efforts to organize against and alienate pro-Western countries in the Middle East. His attempts to redistribute power in the region have led to numerous power vacuums that have been filled by Islamic jihadists and warlords, resulting in increased chaos, destruction of the human rights he claims to embrace, an abominable refugee problem, greater poverty and social destruction. Amid the chaos, Obama slinks away smugly claiming no responsibility for his fairy tale land foreign policy where our worst enemies are going to one day become our best friends once we drop sanctions against them and help blaze a trail for their nuclear arms equality.
At least Putin has a long range idea for the balance of power in the region that isn’t based upon a world where everything must be borne of parity, equality, and fairness. While Putin is not to be trusted, at least his policies are grounded in reality and what is best for Russia. What is ultimately best for the United States falls far down the list of Obama’s priorities when it comes to foreign policy.
You still can't answer my offense with your pathetic defense, so you change the subject. You try to deflate my question, TB. You really are a intellectual limp noodle.
No, you said: " You can already see these effects with the right-wingers on this board ("on this board" being the operative words) At first, they were Trump fanatics, but slowly, inevitably, they are beginning to question his candidacy". Prove to me that that has happened on this board. The truth is that you can't, because it's all a part of your false, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, left wing-driven, liberal narrative. And I implore you, I beseech you, to find where I have ever said anything that would even suggest that I might have backed Trump at any time. Don't waste your stupid time, because you won't find a thing. Why don't you do the board a favor and you just hang yourself, you pathetic fool?