not sure what you meant, but while I do know that 1,000 were traded today and the stock was up 100%, I can't tell you anything about whether shares were bought or sold, or who bought or sold them, only that when a stock goes up 100% on a hundred dollars of trades, something is wacky, no?
it's right here in Yahoo finance.
The Guitammer Company (GTMM) -Other OTC
0.10 Up 0.05(100.00%) 1:23PM EDT
Prev Close: 0.05
1y Target Est: N/A
Next Earnings Date: N/A
Day's Range: 0.10 - 0.10
52wk Range: 0.05 - 0.16
Avg Vol (3m): 5,102
Market Cap: 8.31M
P/E (ttm): N/A
EPS (ttm): -0.02
Div & Yield: N/A (N/A
I have been wondering for over three years, although it did leave the station at 26 PPS, and needless to say, I did not get off that train...
ok, good to know I'm not the only shareholder...
I could swear I saw $2.00+ in the past few years, and hard to believe it, but here we go again...
Rosario, forgive me, but are you long or short INVN? Or bullish or...? I have held for over 3 years now and my average is $16 , and am perpetually grasping at straws or crumbs of daylight...
How or why is the chart "crying out for such?"
And...So it's the chart that is telling you it'll hit $8.50, or...?
After years of hearing you, this is the most pessimistic or skeptical I've heard you. Or at least it sounds that way, surely for the short term, so are you talking about $8.50 pre or post upcoming earnings?
And then once it hits $8.50 WHY should it ascend?
Not challenging your knowledge (as you have been one of the few worthy reads these past three years), just might want a little clarification from you here.
Are there more than two shareholders out there??
Someone say hello, anyone, it's lonely here, and maybe someone has to say something about the company and the technology, which is either of the future or the past...
hmmmmm, good point, but would i rather (or be better advised to) put my money now into Apple or ShakeShack or Google or ERBB?
Actually, I didn't like it at $0.02 but did a lot of averaging down to get to two cents, and in hindsight should not have.