Why is that Apple has NEVER came up with a work around? Apple is scared of VHC patents that they keep infringing upon. Why is Apple trying to use other companies to pursue IPR's for them if they are so pure? APPLE is as crooked as any MAFIA. JUST SAYING!
Willie7 That was the most laughable deposition I have ever read. That stuff could not be made up. Apple has lost it.
Everyone and I mean everyone should read his deposition on IV. This the best Apple can come up with. They are wasting the courts time and money. This is almost the best comedy act I have seen and read. Apple should be embarrassed.
If Apple keeps hiring comics like Mike Fratto. I may have a job as an IT tech expert. Apple lawyers must dragging the dregs of the kegs of beer they are drinking.
Show everyone this list you are talking about. Is this just more trash talk with NO FACTS!
Are you sure they have decided? If you are trying to mislead anyone here you might want to delete your message.
osprey Just a couple of things from my side. Apple never denied they were not infringing (They said they would come up with a work around.) HJD is one of the few Judges that is skilled in computer science. The jury in Apple's case were able to see the source code at work as were able to decide that Apple was infringing. They (jury) could have awarded VHC more money.
Willie7 I try and write info for the new investor to see the truth. I am doing good. Glad to see you are still around. After all these years nobody has disproved the legitimacy of the patents. Now if the CAFC can see their own government are using those same patents.
Let us see here. MSFT gave up knowing what VHC patents had. Apple's jury saw the source code that Apple was using and awarded VHC. Weinstein reiterated the amount that should be paid to VHC. Did I miss something here. Oh! The USPTO has said the patents are good.
A couple of other things you might want to think about. 4G-LTE-A, Government contracts, Apple will have to change Face time among other things attached to Face time for their system to work the way the set it up. Data relay servers ARE NOT SECURE.
oaprey You want to ask yourself how come Apple has not came out with a work around as they told HJD that they could and would. Using relay systems are expensive,not secure and use MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF ELECTRICITY for their relay systems to work. Also how is that cost for using that relay system working out.
terp How is that work around going that Apple said to HJD that would take weeks to do?
terp Where are Apple products made? I will answer that for you NOT IN AMERICA. Apple has talked about bringing out ITV for at least 7 years, so don't even talk about Gabriel. Get off your podium and tell how Apple has stolen most of their products from someone else.
sunmark4221 Thank you for your statement. When the CAFC ruling comes out, then we will see things happen. In the mean time I am waiting for the paint to dry.
terp I have question on how you are going to cover your short shares after a CAFC ruling in favor of VHC. Share prices will move very rapidly towards 30-40 and beyond. En Banc is next impossible. Odds are becoming less in your favor every day. Apple has tried every trick and they have got caught at everyone of those. The judicial system have already figured out that Apple have exhausted their BS factor.
terp You know as well as everyone Apple is in BIG trouble. HJD told them they have nothing to fight with. After the CAFC ruling which no one knows how that will come out or when. If that ruling is in favor of VHC, Apple has NO CHANCE. They have a better chance of working a deal while the RR is at least affordable. Treble damage on the next trial. Oh and by the way all the patents are good to go.
Good luck with that thinking. Apple is in major trouble. HJD just gave them no chance with trial #2. All the patents have been approved even with Apple's underhanded manipulation.