Wed, Jul 23, 2014, 4:58 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 4 hrs 32 mins

Recent

% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

US Airways Group, Inc. Message Board

joesolomon333 279 posts  |  Last Activity: 4 hours ago Member since: Oct 23, 2012
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 4 hours ago Flag

    Not saying SPI=1620 is superior to PBYI's drug which is for early detection patients. We don't know the SPI-1620 data and opportunitiy yet. Just referring to SPPI's superior pipeline. By Far.

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 4 hours ago Flag

    30 million shares outstanding. correction.

    No revenues at all. ZERO and had a 1.79 B market cap before now almost 6 B with zero revenues.

  • Fantastic! I hope PBYI is hugely successful for helping to find a cure for Breast Cancer!

    From a financial standpoint, look at the Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash on Hand, Market Cap (now what with 300 million shares outstanding)?

    SPPI's balance sheet, Revenues, Existing Drugs, Revenue Multiples, Pipeline etc. are ALL SUPERIOR BY FAR. SPI-2012, SP!-1620 (breast cancer), APAZ and the 14 other Pipeline Indications are superior. BY FAR. NOT CLOSE. Just a matter of time.

  • Reply to

    True or False

    by joesolomon333 7 hours ago
    joesolomon333 joesolomon333 6 hours ago Flag

    They both are "owned" and work for their "handlers". Nothing more, nothing less.

  • joesolomon333 by joesolomon333 7 hours ago Flag

    shortshet and dumbhawk are here SOLELY for "entertainment value"?

    They are FOS. They are in category 3 below. No one spends the time they do purely for entertainment. No one, unless they work in a morgue.

    1. If you are bullish on SPPI, then you are long and believe in the Company with or without Raj. You like the existing drugs, pipleline, revenue growth opportunity, undervaluation at 2 x existing revenues plus cash.
    2. If you own SPPI, and whine and are negative then you are an idiot because you are essentially saying that you are only holding your SPPI share because, even though you are unhappy, you do not have the intellectual capability to find a better investment opportunity. A whiner who blames others.
    3. If you do not own SPPI and are negative and bash, then you are a basher whose "handlers and owners" direct you and if you are selling shares short which you do not own in an attempt to negatively impact an oncology company in its battle against cancer, then you can go to Hell.

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 7 hours ago Flag

    You must work in a morgue if this is your entertainment.

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 7 hours ago Flag

    "I come in here solely for the entertainment value. There is a lot of self-medicating and several truly nut cases posting here almost hourly."

    You come here for "entertainment value" and don't even own or have a position on the stock. That makes you the most lonely, sickest person on the board if you come here for entertainment value with no dog in the hunt. LMAO, but as expected. This is your entertainment. LOL

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 12 hours ago Flag

    Of course not. It is a fact. Look it up.

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 12 hours ago Flag

    Actually, the PPS is UP from $6.65 PPS on May 8th only 2 1/2 months ago. "Collapsing" LOL

  • joesolomon333 by joesolomon333 13 hours ago Flag

    1. If you are bullish on SPPI, then you are long and believe in the Company with or without Raj. You like the existing drugs, pipleline, revenue growth opportunity, undervaluation at 2 x existing revenues plus cash.
    2. If you own SPPI, and whine and are negative then you are an idiot because you are essentially saying that you are only holding your SPPI share because, even though you are unhappy, you do not have the intellectual capability to find a better investment opportunity. A whiner who blames others.
    3. If you do not own SPPI and are negative and bash, then you are a basher whose "handlers and owners" direct you and if you are selling shares short which you do not own in an attempt to negatively impact an oncology company in its battle against cancer, then you can go to Hell. Less

    See each of the characters below are in Categories 2 and/or 3:

    Title Replies Latest Post
    Indian CEO Raj (Cha Ching) killed us! Give him another $900,000?
    9 minutes ago by newceocoo 0/0 0 9 minutes ago
    by newceocoo

    RAJ WORST CEO OF NASDAQ
    16 minutes ago by iome70 0/0 0 16 minutes ago
    by iome70

    SPPI has spent its goodwill, now required
    17 minutes ago by dbhawk1952 0/0 1 17 minutes ago
    by dbhawk1952

    MAGGET MAKERS ALREADY REFLECTED THE RESULTS INT HE CURRENT PRICE. STOCK IS A JOKE.
    38 minutes ago by jaasra33

  • Reply to

    MB

    by joesolomon333 Jul 22, 2014 12:11 AM
    joesolomon333 joesolomon333 13 hours ago Flag

    See these characters are in Category 2 and 3:

    Title Replies Latest Post
    Indian CEO Raj (Cha Ching) killed us! Give him another $900,000?
    9 minutes ago by newceocoo 0/0 0 9 minutes ago
    by newceocoo

    RAJ WORST CEO OF NASDAQ
    16 minutes ago by iome70 0/0 0 16 minutes ago
    by iome70

    SPPI has spent its goodwill, now required
    17 minutes ago by dbhawk1952 0/0 1 17 minutes ago
    by dbhawk1952

    MAGGET MAKERS ALREADY REFLECTED THE RESULTS INT HE CURRENT PRICE. STOCK IS A JOKE.
    38 minutes ago by jaasra33

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 14 hours ago Flag

    Root,
    Not sure I saw the Tidal Wave. More like a ripple effect, but appreciate your efforts. LOL

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 15 hours ago Flag

    I guess you did not get the message:

    1. The shareholders' REJECTED the proposed 2014 - 2015 compensation plan.
    2. The Board does not make squat other than some options.
    3. When SPPI is trading at $33 PPS in 3 years or so and a buyout offer is made at $50 to $60 PPS ($3 to $4 Billion), Raj will make $150 tp $180 MILLION at age 73 or 74 with his 2 to 3 million shares and options.

    That is why he and the BOD sell the Company. It all fits nicely. Raj lives happily ever after.

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 15 hours ago Flag

    "No wonder there are no buyout offers because I believe no one wants Rajesh Shrotriya. "

    You do understand that in any buyout Raj is gone. If SPPI is acquired, Raj will necessarily be required to resign as the acquiror will already have a CEO and Chairman of the Board. Thus, your statement makes no sense.

  • joesolomon333 joesolomon333 18 hours ago Flag

    I am confident they have likely received several buyout "solicitations of interest" in the past. Your concern is valid, but I the Board would not have to approve any buyout offers if under the business judgement rule the Board determines that is not in the best interest of the shareholders (i.e. SPI-2012 data, CE-Melphalan opportunity, Apaz filing upcoming, pipeline etc.) and that the buyout price is insufficient given the upcoming shots on goal.

    Then, the suitor would need to either (i) go away for today or (ii) make a "hostile buyout" bid in which case the PPS would immediately shoot up to $14 PPS or higher, shorts would be fried and the BOD would still reject the bid and we would all be happy to ride it to $40 and beyond over the next few years.

  • Reply to

    BlackRock

    by joesolomon333 Jul 21, 2014 11:34 PM
    joesolomon333 joesolomon333 18 hours ago Flag

    Yes, I agree. Just using them as an example. Perhaps, it should be Carl Icahn.

  • joesolomon333 by joesolomon333 Jul 22, 2014 12:11 AM Flag

    1. If you are bullish on SPPI, then you are long and believe in the Company with or without Raj. You like the existing drugs, pipleline, revenue growth opportunity, undervaluation at 2 x existing revenues plus cash.
    2. If you own SPPI, and whine and are negative then you are an idiot because you are essentially saying that you are only holding your SPPI share because, even though you are unhappy, you do not have the intellectual capability to find a better investment opportunity. A whiner who blames others.
    3. If you do not own SPPI and are negative and bash, then you are a basher whose "handlers and owners" direct you and if you are selling shares short which you do not own in an attempt to negatively impact an oncology company in its battle against cancer, then you can go to Hell.

  • joesolomon333 by joesolomon333 Jul 21, 2014 11:34 PM Flag

    Based on the current market cap and financial metrics, they should just spend $150MM and lockup 20 MILLION Shares and reduce the float by one-third and see what the Hedge Funds sht out then.

  • Reply to

    Beleodaq.

    by remd659 Jul 21, 2014 1:46 PM
    joesolomon333 joesolomon333 Jul 21, 2014 11:21 PM Flag

    Why is that. In Two days an New Cancer Drug on the Market to help patients. Where are your priorities? What is desperate is the battle against Cancer.

  • Reply to

    What is next?

    by joesolomon333 Jul 21, 2014 10:30 PM
    joesolomon333 joesolomon333 Jul 21, 2014 11:20 PM Flag

    Short shts don't like this option. LOL.

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.