"Naked shorting is illegal because it allows manipulators a chance to force stock prices down without regard for normal stock supply/demand patterns.
In 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) amended Regulation SHO to further limit possibilities for naked shorting by removing loopholes that existed for some broker/dealers. Regulation SHO requires lists to be published that track stocks with unusually high trends in "fail to deliver" shares."
NAKED SHORTING IS BOTH PROHIBITED AND ILLEGAL. PROHIBITION IS WORTHLESS UNLESS SOMEONE IS POLICING THE ACTIVITY. IN TODAY'S AMERICA, THE MATTER OF ILLEGALITIES SERVE AS GUIDELINES TO CONDUCT BUSINESS BY THIS GOVERNMENT; NOT AS IT SHOULD BE......THE OTHER WAY 'ROUND.
It's cut and dried. She was instructed on how to handle her correspondence securely on more than one occasion and, essentially, ignored the directives. That borders on treason considering the sensitivity of the content of her messages. To the USA, sort of #$%$, I'll do as I please.
I agree that the legal system is a broken down piece of #$%$ that takes forever to make a decision. It is NOT necessary to open all 12,000 documents to form an opinion, for goodness sake!
Thank you for trying to be smart but you have the wrong John Carney. The worm at the WSJ is a lawyer who graduated from law school in 2000, as I recall.
Did the Clinton camp also hired the illegal protesters? And if they are illegal, where's the INS? That would be like shooting ducks in a barrel!
Sweeney APPEARS to be moving in the right direction but I would advise all of you to learn to sleep with one eye open. That way, stuff won't slip up on you in the night.
Screw Corker. Why aren't they interested in the whale story......the F&F conspiracy? We all know laws were broken. Isn't it their job to police those actions and notify DOJ?
He won't support Trump but fails to peek over the fence to see what's on the other side? Go figure!
That's why the country is imploding.
It's nothing more than nosiness and curiosity, plain and simple. As someone said, the most vocal about the subject probably can't even fill out their own simple 1040s!
95 cases of irresponsible parenting. When this happens you hold the parents responsible in court. It won't take long for the message to be sent on safety.
My guess would be that the gun was just lying on a shelf or in a drawer, minding its own business, and did not jump up or out to shoot a kid. What's your take?
Shouldn't have ever been in the running. He one of 535 that need to be run out of Washington on a rail!
That Corker......he sure is market savvy to get all those big gains so quickly. I'd say he was an investing genius! LOL!
You would have thought the World was coming to an end with Watergate; criminal, of course, but primarily because it was of a political nature. When compared to Fanniegate and Freddiegate, Watergate was a couple of kids tussling in a sandbox over a toy. Fanniegate and Freddiegate involve tremendous amounts of money and the activities by the banks, the lenders, members of Congress, and members of the administration seem to be fully criminal in nature. At every turn, laws seemed to have been broken so the list is extensive.
People are playing games for financial gain and power while affecting the livelihoods of thousands of people! We should conduct a slime ball safari, hunt every one of the SOBs down, and kill every damn one of them.
It's like our society is in the swirl portion of a toilet flush and some of us only hope there's something to grab hold of and survive the flush. Things are looking grim!