Mon, Jan 26, 2015, 4:09 AM EST - U.S. Markets open in 5 hrs 21 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Lpath Inc. Message Board

john_j_315 98 posts  |  Last Activity: Jan 21, 2015 1:10 PM Member since: Apr 5, 2010
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Scott gone

    by nyr1647 Nov 4, 2014 4:35 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 6:16 PM Flag

    Thanks for the props but I think it was pure coincidence this time. This was a good curve whereas Left_e's appearances usually come with bad news. For me this is a good thing and I will pick up some shares if we actually take a hit. That being said, I would not be surprised one bit if nothing happened at all or if the stock actually went up on the news. He is the reason we are where we are. I can't imagine how his leaving could be viewed as anything but positive. Guess we'll see tomorrow.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Scott gone

    by nyr1647 Nov 4, 2014 4:35 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 5:02 PM Flag

    While a true "resignation" is always possible, it is usually just a face saving catchall. My guess would be he was asked to leave by someone(s). Pfizer is a good as candidate as any but it's anyone's guess. Maybe some of our occasional posters have some info.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Scott gone

    by nyr1647 Nov 4, 2014 4:35 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 4:38 PM Flag

    My respect for the board just moved up one notch.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Lacy 2003 vs the board bully

    by left_e_investing Nov 3, 2014 4:47 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 3:35 PM Flag

    Maybe his alter ego comes out under his alias because he has been combative and condescending with just about everyone here under both - Well except Lacy_2003 for whatever reason.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Lacy 2003 vs the board bully

    by left_e_investing Nov 3, 2014 4:47 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 3:07 PM Flag

    By the way, not that it really matters but how in the world would you know that? If true I am betting he just puckered an orifice.

    I still have not deciphered the CRMP/RCMP reference by the way other than the references are not exactly correct.. Any more hints?

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Lacy 2003 vs the board bully

    by left_e_investing Nov 3, 2014 4:47 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 3:02 PM Flag

    It's the same guy. Trader ended and Investor commenced immediately after a heated exchange with me and a poor choice of words by the antecedent including "for the record". He's been accusing me of liable and referencing his misunderstanding of the options here identically under both aliases.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Lacy 2003 vs the board bully

    by left_e_investing Nov 3, 2014 4:47 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 12:54 PM Flag

    Then you are just not paying attention Lacy. I have said numerous times there is absolutely nothing new to talk about with respect to the science four years running now. I have also said numerous times that the ONLY reason I am still here is because of the science. Read like your buddy Left_e keeps telling you to do.

    Our stock is not less than half of where it was because of the efficacy or lack-there-of of the science. Nor my posts to a dozen or so people on this board for that matter. That weight lies solely on the shoulders of the decision makers here and absent new news on the SCIENCE, that is my current area of interest/concern. Get it? I doubt it.

    Give me something new to talk about (with respect to iSONEP) and I'm in. Leave the ad nauseam regurgitation of what we already know for the conferences.

    And saying I am short just solidifies my view of you - You just don't get it.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Lacy 2003 vs the board bully

    by left_e_investing Nov 3, 2014 4:47 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 10:16 AM Flag

    Opto, I wouldn't spend too much of your time trying to reason with Left_e (for one reason) and Charles (for another). Neither are looking for constructive dialogue here.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Lacy 2003 vs the board bully

    by left_e_investing Nov 3, 2014 4:47 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 4, 2014 9:25 AM Flag

    You're like an ingrown hair.

    For the record I have never attempted to manipulate a stock price of any company in any aspect or form. I will also state for the record that I have never nor will I ever attempt to manipulate the opinion of this board via deception or misdirection. I state my opinions and identify them as such.

    I will also repeat that this is my regular Yahoo ID that I have used for many years and the one I used to contact the company to include identifying myself. I don't hide behind multiple IDs like others.

    How about you? Play any soccer lately?

    Last post.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Seems like every time he shows up we get a new curve thrown at us. Coincidence? Probably not.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Lacy 2003 vs the board bully

    by left_e_investing Nov 3, 2014 4:47 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 3, 2014 6:39 PM Flag

    At least I now know (suspected) who my other thumb monkey is. Thanks for revealing yourself.

    I don't sell in 100 share increments there Left trading/investing. I was simply making an observation. Now go back to your basement with Atthund (and possibly Charles) and plot your next inane scathe. See you in a month.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • john_j_315 john_j_315 Nov 1, 2014 10:55 AM Flag

    Charles, you're an idiot plain and simple and the worst part is you actually think you know what you are talking about and no one is going to convince you otherwise; no matter how many times they are right and you are wrong. You have no clue what your are talking about or doing and calling yourself and investor is absurd. But hey, you keep right on talking to Scott for us. Sure has netted you a lot over the years hasn't it?

    For the record, I have contacted the company on multiple occasions with questions that I knew they would actually answer. I assure you my pair is a lot bigger than yours. Your time would be better served listening and learning.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • john_j_315 john_j_315 Oct 31, 2014 7:57 PM Flag

    Please don't defend me against Charles. If anything just feel sorry for him. My guess is that he is one of those people who has been taken advantage of his whole life. The system eats guys like him for lunch every day.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Another Patent!!!

    by uncle_donnie Oct 20, 2014 12:26 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Oct 31, 2014 1:14 PM Flag

    No one to answer questions? The only reason I could imagine that scenario is if everyone with answers was answering questions for someone(s) else. Location is probably not relevant but Atlanta (if that is the case) is an expensive long haul for an entire management team.

    Maybe they are all down there "team building" on our dime.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Another Patent!!!

    by uncle_donnie Oct 20, 2014 12:26 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Oct 31, 2014 7:06 AM Flag

    Not to detract from my dislike for the guy but you have to ponder a situation where someone can have this track record, continue to have no tangible portion of his income tied to the success of the stock, to have no history of any serious stock purchases and to be not only gainfully employed but highly compensated for it. Is he truly driving the ship or doing what he is told? That's my million dollar question.

    I don't think this is by any means something unique to Lpath but it doesn't make it any more palatable.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • john_j_315 john_j_315 Oct 30, 2014 12:58 PM Flag

    The PPS is 100% reflective of a self-serving management team with a history of perpetual delays, a distinct bias against its shareholders and a tenacity to dilution us into oblivion.

    The (sad) fact is that it has absolutely nothing to do with the prospects for the indications since we really have no new information to make that assessment on.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Tax Loss Selling

    by john_j_315 Oct 29, 2014 3:49 PM
    john_j_315 john_j_315 Oct 30, 2014 9:15 AM Flag

    No. I think he has himself, the management team and the board pretty well protected now and the kitty is full yet again with nothing to show for it. My guess is he will do what he does best - absolutely nothing. Maybe a company paid vacation or two to regurgitate the same dribble we have been getting for three or four years now. but other than that I would expect silence for the rest of the year. Oh yeah, just my hypothesis of course...:)

    Sentiment: Hold

  • john_j_315 by john_j_315 Oct 29, 2014 3:49 PM Flag

    Wonder if we are going to see any of that here in the coming weeks...

    Sentiment: Hold

LPTN
2.96-0.01(-0.34%)Jan 23 3:55 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.