ok you said guaranteed, so that usually means you do something if you're wrong. How about posting tomorrow, I anhtexas don't know squat about stock if your wrong. Is that open red or close red?
1) I love this new yahoo format where you can't tell who is replying to what 2) Jack, like i said this has nothing to do with the stock price, CLEARLY they will get participants - it was just a thought I had 3)bfs - there are no tigers in africa
brilliant reply Jack, quite original, I've never seen that mom stuff before, did it take you 11 hrs to come up with that? marginally better, primarily better because you are more likely to take all the required shots right jack?
1) there is a very effective alternative, it just takes one more shot (I had them before my last trip to africa)
2) the safety has been questioned by the EU and the FDA - conspiracy theory this all you want, the FDA has determined there is not enough evidence to prove the stuff is safe yet
I really thought this was a fairly innocuous comment. basically I think only a moron would let someone inject an unproven, non-essential substance into your arm. But apparently, there are plenty of morons in this world (thanks for the affirmation)
I kind of doubt the FDA can explain to me why someone would subject themselves to an unproven vax test. this is not a bearish post, I'm not trying to say they won't find participants, I'm saying who is it that puts themselves on the line for an unproven vax, when a reasonable alternative exists - again these folks aren't trying to be cured. would any of you stick your arm out to be a test subject? I wouldn't
go look at the financials yourself, the payout ratio has dropped to 65% for 2013, they have pleny of coverage for the divy this year and it would appear for 2014 as well
when you sprout a 3rd eye I'm thinking all that seems pretty trivial. Again there is a vaccine that works pretty good - this is not a bash, clearly new vax are tested all the time but I would need a pretty decent check to do this kind of test
so we are hoping for a takeover bid? What will happen that could change this stock before the end of 2014 to mid 2015 (I assume that the results will come out around that time)
I understand taking a experimental drug if I'm dying of cancer or have chronic pain but who volunteers to be a test subject for a vaccine (especially when a vaccine already exists)
they also stated that the EU is questioning why they would allow this vax, if the safety isn't clear, when there is another vax that works fairly well on the market - I think the eu will wait for the us data to be final.
seemed to deliver. payout ratio was 65%, 2014 should be something similar as increased taxes and the continual grind down of revenues will be offset by lower capex and interest reductions. They don't owe any debt until 2015, 700M and they should generate 500M from operations before that is due. Divy seems safe unless they get tired of not getting any credit for it like centurylink - I did note only 2 mentions of divvy on call and not about its absolute plan to retain it Don't see the stock going anywhere but enjoy the 11%
I'm way behind so just had the opportunity to catch up and it seems European approval is unlikely, the US approval is at earliest 2016. What other catalysts could there be between now and then barring a acquisition to own this stock?
1st - I'm a fan of the show
2nd - he panicked and not only said to sell, he did sell part of the position for his trust very near the low
I listen to him, I hear what he's saying but some time you have to look at the reality and the chances of the SEC coming down on LINE were close to nil. Listen to anyone you want on CNBC, just don't be a sheep