On this day two years ago this stock was $.26. Last year the stock was $1.73. This little dip is just a buying opportunity in the long run. I'm not pumping just pointing out facts. Go ahead bashers, bash away.
You need to go do your homework before you spew your nonsense and threaten people because you just showed everyone that you are the fool!
Nah. Just because he has been right about 10% of the time doesn't mean anyone owes him anything. Every day he posts his bashing nonsense, can't he just leave and take all the other bashers and pumpers with him?
That's just sound advice at any time for any stock. Cut the bs basher, do you have anything of value to post?
At this moment the theory would be correct, now if the government stopped their illegal sweep amendment then that's a different story. They conviently forget to mention facts like the government is taking all the profits so it can't recapitalize in the article.
Only by a few pennies but that level at which Icahn bought gives traders a floor, even if its only symbolic.
He shouldn't be misinformed, he is an Economics Professor! I'm just wondering if this is what he really thinks or just political rhetoric. I'm glad Cantor the amnesty lover was voted out but this is a big shake up in the majority leadership.
I thought Frank's Jewish rant entertaining but look at this...
In case you were not aware, the Sweep amendment happened under Obama's watch which was meant to kill FnF...
Oh right I still didn't answer your second question. Well I believed he deserted when he was a PFC (E3), so the first promotion to SPC (E4) is automatic, its based on time. The second promotion from SPC (E4) to SGT (E5) was a promotion in absentia, probably before the investigation concluded that he deserted. Most likely so it wouldn't seem like he was being punished for his "captivity".
Hahaha...you are so full of bs. I didn't know you were a SEAL, Green Beret, LRSD, RECON Ranger Internet Warrior hahaha. I do get it. Why would this administration break the law? No idea, maybe they think congress is only a suggestion. Answer me this: Why would he leave his weapon on post if he was a "captive"?
From the NY Times, a conservative newspaper (lol):
A Pentagon investigation in 2010 concluded that there was "incontrovertible" evidence that Bergdahl walked away from his unit. According to The New York Times, a military investigation showed that on the night he went missing, he left a note in his tent that said he was leaving to start a new life. The letter said that Bergdahl wanted to renounce his citizenship
I pretend to be a veteran? #$%$ off. InteI and procedures I'm sure was of value at the time of his desertion and I don't believe him to have been a captive. If he was really a POW then he would have ended up on Youtube showing his decapitation. Have a nice day you Demoncrat troll.
They went to look for him because thats what the Army does in case of a deserter or a POW,
He is still a US soldier after all. Your second question should be phrased differently. They also wanted this guy back because he had knowledge of Army procedures and intel in the area. I never said it was up to me, I said a court martial should decide.
Personally I don't believe either party has any interest in the average U.S. citizen so get off your high horse Demoncrat.