Dear Jimmy Olsen (Cub Reporter), I noticed neither you nor any of your aliases have mentioned a SIGA(Q) reverse split possibility. Wouldn't that help your sponsor prolong the "screwing" that you so often bemoan? Consider this, a reverse split would even give you, and yours, a longer reason to exist. Go SIGA(Q)/PIP!
No matter when I peek in it is the same scenario: when the stock goes down "the narrarator" comments about it and Rose. Wouldn't it be something if "the narrarator" was Rose or his agent? Why, you ask. You tell me!