Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Вашингтон Мучел Message Board

jumpytrader 157 posts  |  Last Activity: 14 hours ago Member since: Jul 26, 2007
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • playing in this shell game.

  • Reply to

    No trades so far 11:39 am so

    by jumpytrader May 26, 2016 11:41 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 26, 2016 11:56 AM Flag

    1,250,000 shares yesterday totaling $1500. at 12:20 pm. So maybe we will see yet another lunch time trade today.

  • jumpytrader by jumpytrader May 26, 2016 11:41 AM Flag

    What`s up? Have all the sheep left the pen?

  • Reply to

    Answer to - -Any One read the 10Q

    by jumpytrader May 25, 2016 11:48 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 25, 2016 7:11 PM Flag

    That's why it is called The Corporate Shell Game!

  • Reply to

    Answer to - -Any One read the 10Q

    by jumpytrader May 25, 2016 11:48 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 25, 2016 6:00 PM Flag

    Especially if you have some influence in who get paid first from revenue!

  • Reply to

    Answer to - -Any One read the 10Q

    by jumpytrader May 25, 2016 11:48 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 25, 2016 5:41 PM Flag

    Oops,
    I forgot to subtract the interest from the total repayment to get the principle of $88,543. So that would make the interest / return on investment to the Note holders/ licensor a whopping 55%.Not 35%. Nice Shell game!

  • Fact 1: "During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company fully repaid the note-holders a total of $137,399 including principal and accrued interest of $48,856." In English that means convertible debt is repay and no more toxic debt.

    ******** Opinion
    Obviously the confirmed income from fact 2 below was used to repay the Note holders/ inside shareholders with over a 35% return on investment at the expense of the common share holders instead of being used to further the Company Sales Goals or survival.

    Fact 2: HCTI confirmed revenues in 1Q16 generated from the $3MM deal signed with Industry Finishes and Systems in January 2016.

    AS for your subjective statement about increased sales and travel costs---?
    It remains to be seen and is highly doubtful that the common share holders will ever benefit, But it is likely that the Licensor will reap the benefit, as will the Debt holders and pumper dumpers.
    Well that is Just my opinion based on reading back the last 7 years of corporate filings and reverse mergers. Rinse repeat, rinse repeat.

    Buyer Beware!!!

  • Reply to

    Option to give NTI controlling interest by 2020

    by starf_da_barf May 23, 2016 11:37 PM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 25, 2016 11:19 AM Flag

    Correction ***
    I miss typed above,
    I meant to say who actually owns or is Nanotech Industries INC. The licensor. (not NTI).
    That is who benefits Not HCTI share holders.

    But I think you got the message.

  • Reply to

    Option to give NTI controlling interest by 2020

    by starf_da_barf May 23, 2016 11:37 PM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 24, 2016 6:09 PM Flag

    ****On February 12, 2016, Hybrid Coating Technologies Inc. (the "Company"), through its wholly owned subsidiary Nanotech Industries International Inc. ("NTI"), and Nanotech Industries Inc. (the "Licensor") entered into a Eleventh Amendment ("Eleventh Amendment....*****
    According to this --
    Nanotech Industries International or(" NTI") is the subsidiary of HCTI and Nanotech Industries Inc. is a separate company. ( the "Licensor").

    The question is who is the owner of or who is Nanotech International Inc. ?

    But check these web sites. If these addresses don't work just do a search for Nanotech Industries International and then for Nanotech industries Inc. and due your DD.

    https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2010/08/30/428597/200405/en/Nanotech-Industries-International-Inc-Completes-Reverse-Merger-With-EPOD-solar

    http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=49213734

    .htmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=49213734

    http://www.nanotechindustriesinc.com/contac

    http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=8535392.

  • Reply to

    Anyone Read the 10Q

    by cnl.group May 24, 2016 10:03 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 24, 2016 12:37 PM Flag

    I see the 2 messages here from You, are the only posts showing for cnl.group.
    So are you part of
    ( CNL Financial Group (CNL), formerly Commercial Net Lease, a Orlando, Florida based private investment management and commercial real estate ...) and what is your position there?

    Is CNL one of the holders of the 7 million dollars of debt HCTI has?

  • Reply to

    Anyone Read the 10Q

    by cnl.group May 24, 2016 10:03 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 24, 2016 12:13 PM Flag

    Part 3 0f 3.

    c. Issue purchase warrants to purchase 126,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock ("12- Month Warrants"), to be issued 12 months following the execution of this Agreement ("12-Month Deadline"). The 12-Month Warrants shall be exercisable at any time from the date of issuance at a price per share equal to the par value of the Series B Preferred Stock and shall expire ten years from the date of issuance.

    (The "90-Day Warrants" and the 12-Month Warrants" collectively referred to as the "Warrants").


    d. Pay the Licensor an amount equal to US $1,500,000 (one million five hundred thousand USD) ("One Time Fee"), to be paid within 12 (twelve) months of the execution of this Eleventh Amendment Agreement ("Fee Deadline").

    3. Should NTI not meet any of: (i) the Share Issuance Deadline; or (ii) the 90-Day Deadline; or (iii) the 12- Month Deadline; or (iv) the Fee Deadline (individually referred to as "Unmet Deadline") and should such Unmet Deadline not be extended by the Parties, Section 3 (ii) of the Licensing Agreement shall take immediate effect at the time of such Unmet Deadline, upon a written notice by the Licensor to NTI.

  • Reply to

    Anyone Read the 10Q

    by cnl.group May 24, 2016 10:03 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 24, 2016 12:10 PM Flag

    Part- 2 of 3.
    Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2014, the Ninth Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2014 and the Tenth Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 14, 2015. The Eleventh Amendment to the Licensing Agreement is intended to modify the Licensing Agreement as follows and no other changes are being made by means of this filing:

    1. Pursuant to the terms of the Eleventh Amendment Agreement, NTI granted the Company an extension on the Extended Exclusivity Period (as defined in the Licensing Agreement), which has been extended to December 31, 2020 ("2020 Extended Exclusivity Period").

    2. In consideration for the 2020 Extended Exclusivity Period, NTI shall pay the following consideration to the Licensor ("Consideration"):

    a. Issue 2,240,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred Shares"), to be issued at the time of execution of this Eleventh Amendment Agreement ("Share Issuance Deadline").

    b. Issue purchase warrants to purchase 31,300,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock ("90- Day Warrants"), to be issued 90 days following the execution of this Agreement ("90- Day Deadline"). The 90-Day Warrants shall be exercisable at any time from the date of issuance at a price per share equal to the par value of the Series B Preferred Stock and shall expire ten years from the date of issuance.

    c. Issue purchase warrants to purchase 126,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock ("12- Month Warrants"), to be issued 12 months following the execution of this Agreement ("12-Month Deadline"). The 12-Month Warrants shall be exercisable at any time from the date of issuance at a price per share equal to the par value of the Series B Preferred Stock and shall expire ten years from the date

  • Reply to

    Anyone Read the 10Q

    by cnl.group May 24, 2016 10:03 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 24, 2016 11:59 AM Flag

    Have you read this before? part 1

    Form 8-K for HYBRID COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

    19-Feb-2016
    Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Financial Statements
    ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
    On February 12, 2016, Hybrid Coating Technologies Inc. (the "Company"), through its wholly owned subsidiary Nanotech Industries International Inc. ("NTI"), and Nanotech Industries Inc. (the "Licensor") entered into a Eleventh Amendment ("Eleventh Amendment Agreement") to the Licensing Agreement previously entered into by and between the Parties on July 12, 2010, amended on March 17, 2011, on July 7, 2011, on June 28, 2013, on December 13, 2013, on March 31, 2014, on April 9, 2014, on May 6, 2014 , on August 19, 2014, on September 10, 2014 and on August 15, 2015. The Licensing Agreement was previously filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2011, the Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K on March 21, 2011, the Second Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K on July 8, 2011, the Third Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 28, 2013, the Fourth Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2013, the Fifth Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2014, the Sixth Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 10, 2014, the Seventh Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2014, the Eighth Amendment to the Licensing Agreement was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Cu

  • Reply to

    This message board is a Total Sham

    by compressa69 May 23, 2016 5:32 AM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 23, 2016 3:05 PM Flag

    I think he missed the bed side and got the bed post up his exhaust port! So now he just keeps burping!

  • Reply to

    This stock is going to fly!

    by pittyfuk May 20, 2016 4:26 PM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 22, 2016 6:47 PM Flag

    A Goat is the answer, She will provide fertilizer, keep the grass trimmed and even provide kids if you want some.

  • Reply to

    This stock is going to fly!

    by pittyfuk May 20, 2016 4:26 PM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 21, 2016 11:21 AM Flag

    I just heard that he has decided to sod his deck, that way it will be green in the summer and white in the winter.
    That is truly a * TRUE GREEN* solution.
    Hey I could sell that as a commercial.
    Copy right reserved. :-))

  • jumpytrader by jumpytrader May 20, 2016 5:21 PM Flag

    Check the press releases on the HVCW page. HVCW is a franchise holder. LOL

  • Reply to

    POT is a BUY

    by n1nja_trader May 16, 2016 4:53 PM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 18, 2016 2:16 PM Flag

    You are probably correct,
    I was originally thinking all futures in general and then did not think about that when I was responding should have said Corn.
    The point is still the same.
    Good catch Stain

  • Reply to

    POT is a BUY

    by n1nja_trader May 16, 2016 4:53 PM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 18, 2016 1:55 PM Flag

    Good way to look at it !

  • Reply to

    POT is a BUY

    by n1nja_trader May 16, 2016 4:53 PM
    jumpytrader jumpytrader May 18, 2016 12:45 PM Flag

    Sorry I should have been a little more clear. When I said speculation I meant the hedge funds had driven the commodities futures pricing including Potash (per ton) out of sight as well as the POT share price.
    Then as the banking crisis hit they could no longer speculate, so crashing down came pot ash per ton and POT the company as not only the hedge funds got out but your other non float share holders did as well.
    A lot of long time board members here thought and posted how pot ash and POT would go back to those high prices in a year or two shouting everyone has to eat, but it never happened. Those prices from back then drove the investment that has created all the expansion and over capacity that did not exist back then. Pot ash per ton at those high prices with all the current over capacity just wont` happen.
    I wish it would I would trade it both ways. Can`t trade it at all now.
    Abba has a more realistic view.
    It is all History now.
    Good luck to you.