Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Oclaro, Inc. Message Board

karnut2000 43 posts  |  Last Activity: Aug 30, 2015 1:13 PM Member since: Sep 6, 1999
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Educated Chartists...please read

    by karnut2000 Aug 26, 2015 3:53 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 30, 2015 1:13 PM Flag

    You were schooled...you learned how to spell correctly. One word is a start anyway. Uneducated? Not I. Trained by one of the world's top technical analysis individuals, I am confident of my skills. As you have already shown to be little more than an impudent snot, surely you won't believe the truth. It's fitting that insulting people disregard the truth, then fail to benefit from it. I rather like that.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Educated Chartists...please read

    by karnut2000 Aug 26, 2015 3:53 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 28, 2015 10:25 PM Flag

    You calling me a spear-headed moron is a total laff riot !!!! Your advice that I should "move on and get something that resembles a life" is not quite as funny. It's more lame than funny. You, whoppernopickle, an illiterate chartist and someone who in the last half hour called me an "embicile". I'd say you should reserve your opinions until you can pass a sixth grade spelling test. I'll help...that word begins with an i.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Time for Another Reverse Split!!!

    by ibmwatcher Jun 11, 2015 10:45 AM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 28, 2015 9:19 PM Flag

    On this very thread Aug 25, 2015 2:05 PM my reply was "You're clueless." I've also said Aug 24, 2015 11:53 PM."an outright lie by cloudy_day_jane that I use the ibmwatcher alias" And yesterday I posted Aug 27, 2015 2:35 PM, "Shorty this merely the beginning of your pain Congrats!" Which also included a Strong Buy sentiment. What I'm dealing with today is some bone brain using the alias cloudy_day_jane that I use your alias, ibmwatcher. There is absolutely no logic, no common sense to that cloudy_day_jane accusation. One last thing ibmwatcher, you are a lying slimeball, probably short QTWW and it would be no surprise that goes for cloudy_day_jane as well.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Shorty this merely the beginning of your pain

    by karnut2000 Aug 27, 2015 2:35 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 28, 2015 7:57 PM Flag

    No doubt in my mind

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 28, 2015 7:57 PM Flag

    Liars and cowards aren't all that dissimilar. Your lies are catching up with you, coward.

  • Congrats!

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Ripe For Reverse Split!!!

    by ibmwatcher Jun 25, 2015 12:33 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 27, 2015 2:34 PM Flag

    A perfectly illogical thing to honestly believe that I use the ibmwatcher handle. At the same time, your perspective is perfectly logical for that of an idiot.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Educated Chartists...please read

    by karnut2000 Aug 26, 2015 3:53 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 27, 2015 1:51 PM Flag

    An analyst that appeared on CNBC once said use fundamental analysis to decide what to buy and use technical analysis for when to buy. The news shows the fundamental aspect, the adoption of product is gaining new users and the chart indicates we move toward past support. I expect the next 6 months to be outstanding for new shareholders.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Ripe For Reverse Split!!!

    by ibmwatcher Jun 25, 2015 12:33 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 26, 2015 3:56 PM Flag

    Anyone believing that is dumber than cloudy_day_jane. And I would not rule out that you use that alias.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Surely some jerkwad is considering to give some tea leaves bash. With that out of the way, the Bollinger Band spread here is extreme. Indicative to my specific point, one mush view a six month chart w/BBands, SMA 50 ($2.03 at present) with stochastics on the rise. At the $2.30 area of Mid-March, the bloat of the bands precedes the rise in share price to the $2.70/$3.05 area, the second week of April. That range became support going into the second week of June. Since that support has failed IMMENSELY, IMHO, near-term pricing will remain quite a value proposition. And the current BBand bloat (the divergence of the upper and lower bands) is in excess compared to the Mid-March period. The mistake many will make, again IMHO, is profits will be taken too early. Here's something educated chartists know explicitly...past support becomes resistance. Therefore, expect resistance to be tested. Should the PPS break through that 60+ day resistance, and I expect it will, very enviable gains will be realized by early 2016, perhaps sooner.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 25, 2015 2:10 PM Flag

    I may have said that at the end of June. Not going back, wasting my time. What I have said many times when I say a stock is cheap. I've said use a tight stop loss. QTWW is an investment at these levels and not a trade. A dip is a buying opportunity. If you want to play the name game, indicate which alias posts next. Keep your self occupied with that name-game thing.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Time for Another Reverse Split!!!

    by ibmwatcher Jun 11, 2015 10:45 AM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 25, 2015 2:05 PM Flag

    You're clueless.

  • Reply to

    bataction_II

    by ibmwatcher Aug 4, 2015 1:08 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 25, 2015 2:04 PM Flag

    Did that troll put you on ignore? Not a bad idea...

  • karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 25, 2015 12:06 AM Flag

    I need to do a better job proof-reading my messages before hitting Post. I made an error in the above message, stating in error... Truth is a lie can not be passed off as a lie. I meant to type... Under the guise of truth, a lie can not be passed off as the truth. Both ibmwatcher and cloudy_day_jane lie often...THAT is the absolute truth.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Making the lie bolder cloudy_day_jane states that I myself had proven that in August of 2014. Bring on that so-called proof, cloudy...bring it, you disgusting liar...BRING IT! Truth is a lie can not be passed off as a lie, you disgusting liar. And the same challenge goes out to you cloudy_day_jane that I put to ibmwatcher. You and I meet at Yahoo HQ. I offer you the same proposition as I had done with ibmwatcher...another disgusting liar. Yahoo is to be compensated for their services by the loser. I put up $100,000.00 you only need to put up $10,000.00...but loser pays Yahoo as well. Yahoo determines if it is at all possible for my IP addy to be the same as ibmwatcher...and it won't be and I take your 10 grand. Are you up for the challenge...(of course the repugnant liar is not). Neither ibmwatcher nor cloudy_day_jane cares to lose 10 grand over what they know to be their respective lie.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Ripe For Reverse Split!!!

    by ibmwatcher Jun 25, 2015 12:33 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 24, 2015 4:42 PM Flag

    You are true to the slimewad, ibmwatcher.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • ibmwatcher followed me around something like a dozen boards...maybe more, I lose count. Always with the same BS...a list of screen names with the assertion that they all belong to me. That is a lie. Challenging ibmwatcher several times over to meet at Yahoo HQ for them to confirm or deny the ibmwatcher accusations, providing ibmwatcher would accept me giving ibmwatcher odds, favoring ibmwatcher 10 to 1. I'd put up $100 grand and ibmwatcher 10G. If Yahoo confirms his list of aliases that all SUPPOSEDLY belong to me, he gets $100,000.00 plus any expense Yahoo chooses for their input in this dispute. If ibmwatcher's list of aliases proves to be unsupported by Yahoo, ibmwatcher gives me10G plus paying Yahoo for their services.
    This stand but the liar will squirm with either no reply or one slimy squirm rejection of my proposal. Which aliasclown replies first? cloudy_day_jane or ibmwatcher?

  • Reply to

    cloudy_day_jane is CLUELESS!!!

    by ibmwatcher Aug 24, 2015 1:55 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 24, 2015 3:42 PM Flag

    Much more true to the big picture, cloudy_day_jane is the resident irritant...much like you over the many, many years. You, much like the irritant, focus on comingling screen names as belonging to one individual. You have made such unprovable accusations for years and cloudy_day_jane does the same. What follows is reposting of dialogue from cloudy_day_jane • Oct 9, 2014 1:12 PM...
    cloudy_day_jane - once again ibmwatcher shows up with karnut
    He doesn't even try to hide the fact anymore that he is both.
    karnut2000 (me, with the start date of 09/06/99, not some similar looking later produced imposter) • Oct 9, 2014 1:25 PM I replied...I'm not hiding anything, you idiot. ibmwatcher began the lies years before you created your screen name, jerknugget. That poster and I are not the same individual and you can believe otherwise until the end of time for all I care and further prove your abject stupidity. AND then, less than a week later I also replied to the same thread...You (cloudy_day_jane ) are one simplistically foolish individual. Your lack of confidence is obvious. I am not ibmwatcher. It would be next to impossible that there's anyone stupid enough to believe you. Here's another proposition to counter or accept that I can't raise $100,000.00. Pick a number you can afford to lose....over $2,000.00. I'll open an account at a major bank that we can agree upon. When you find that new account with $100 grand verified, your number becomes my cash that you provide, loser. Be the liar and coward that ibmwatcher has trained you to be and refuse. To the present and for clarity sake...I offered a wager to both cloudy and ibm, that if their multiple screen name usage had any validity, we meet at Yahoo HQ, whereby Yahoo will for a fee confirm or deny accusations. You, ibmwatcher and cloudy_day_jane know you are liars and neither of you accepted the challenge. As far as I'm concerned, ibmwatcher, you and cloudy_day_jane are sinlar enough to be considered the same person

  • Reply to

    Time for Another Reverse Split!!!

    by ibmwatcher Jun 11, 2015 10:45 AM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Aug 14, 2015 2:06 PM Flag

    Your pathetically disgusting existence revolves around being a message board annoyance to people with decent character traits. I doubt you will ever rise above your current and past deeds.

OCLR
2.66-0.06(-2.21%)Sep 1 4:00 PMEDT