Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Cinemark Holdings Inc. Message Board

karnut2000 9373 posts  |  Last Activity: Apr 16, 2015 7:58 PM Member since: Sep 6, 1999
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Looking at today's 1 day chart, strong volume for the day kicked in right at the low of the day, $2.90 to $2.93 a bit after NOON EST.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    WOW Karnut2000 has 9400 posts

    by cloudy_day_jane Apr 16, 2015 4:47 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 16, 2015 7:55 PM Flag

    You are terrible at math. Earlier you demonstrated that. I pushed aside your earlier lame-brained thinking thusly...your contention that I "own 98% of the aliases" and done in the frame of a far bigger liar, ibmwatcher. So this to you cloudy_day_jane I am going to work the math. To arrive at 98% are mine, there needs to be at the minimum 50 aliases posting. So you are the only alias being the other person...leaving 49 mine or 98% mine for the 98 percentage you claim as accurate. To summate, list my 49 aliases, or how you see my 49 aliases. • • • And what did you do...you failed! You wimped out. And with your simple-mindedness, you persist telling me again I am " a loser with no life " which also has been rejected... I replied to you 03 -25 at
    6:16PM, a typical fact-free reply comes from cloudy_day_jane " you really don't have a life" and yet the obvious truth is the alias cloudy_day_jane absolutely is included (to a degree) in my life. And cloudy_day_jane knows it! I detest liars...and do not give them the floor without being rejected. On to another subject you bring up karnut2000 has 9400 posts. My alias began September of 1999. Well over 5,000 days ago...I'm averaging fewer than 2 messages a day. Your singular alias and presuming you only have one began October 6, 2012 and your next message will be your 4,500th!!!!!! You are averaging nearly 5 a day...more than double my average. As for you tallying 70,000 messages to me with the assumption I have so many other aliases...to be fair I can say all your aliases tally over 140,000. You so suck at lying if you think you have a scintilla of credibility. Watch QTWW move over three dollars.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 16, 2015 4:17 PM Flag

    itsrussiavisreeeeel the earned board idiot title belongs to cloudy_day_jane. Tell how you'd dispute that...give it your best shot.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    A blatant and ridiculous lie by cloudy_day_jane

    by karnut2000 Apr 16, 2015 4:07 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 16, 2015 4:15 PM Flag

    I've assailed ibmweatcher years before you created your cloudy_day_jane alias...so you've lied again. Another lie with the stupid belief on your part that you have adequately brushed aside your earlier lie, as I've illustrated in the very message you replied to, you fool. You chose an idiot's diversionary tactic, which was your only option, you lying idiot.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • that I "own 98% of the aliases" and done in the frame of a far bigger liar, ibmwatcher. So this to you cloudy_day_jane I am going to work the math. To arrive at 98% are mine, there needs to be at the minimum 50 aliases posting. So you are the only alias being the other person...leaving 49 mine or 98% mine for the 98 percentage you claim as accurate. To summate, list my 49 aliases, or how you see my 49 aliases. You are such an idiot...your lies have the weakest legitimacy attached to them; you are and will continue to be the most pathetic joke of a poster, just behind ibmwatcher and dumpster900. Lastly other aliases, other than karnut2000, have shown you to be quite the haples rube, while they also prove their messages offer good advice. I urge you to continue making a fool of your self. I rather enjoy seeing you wallow in your abject stupidity.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • bad idea to sell

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    As the volume decreases The days to cover swells

    by karnut2000 Apr 16, 2015 3:37 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 16, 2015 3:50 PM Flag

    Any dumbo that finds you've offered any proof whatsoever to your claim, is dumber than you. I doubt there is anyone that stupid reading this board.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • However, cyclopsfighter member since Sep 14, 1999...so as not to be confused with imposters, did warn North American Palladium board readers with a sell rating, yesterday prior to the market open. Checking that today, last trade down 47.63% and shares are halted. cloudy_day_jane, often referred to as the board idiot here, has nothing to validate the opinion of cyclopsfighter being stupid. Now if I get 1 or 10,000 thumbs down on this, or any thumbs or no thumbs...I will not change what you've read and the accuracy of the meaning in this message.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    im back in @ 1.4

    by blooooooodsucker Mar 2, 2015 10:18 AM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 16, 2015 3:41 PM Flag

    I was out over $2 having initially bought around $1.80...then averaging down prior to my exit. $1.18 now. I think I'll wait. Some other deep dives are adding to my indecision.

  • Shorts have a problem...follow-up after the close tomorrow.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    newbies will fail to see the humor...

    by karnut2000 Mar 25, 2015 5:14 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 16, 2015 3:33 PM Flag

    cloudy_day_jane • Mar 25, 2015 5:18 PM replies "lmao you really don't have a life. roflmao"
    Feeble minds amuse both easily and without a sing of intelligence. Truth is my buy rating after the close march 25, it was valid. Anyway, I'll repeat to you how I replied to you 03 -25 6: 16PM, a typical fact-free reply comes from cloudy_day_jane " you really don't have a life" and yet the obvious truth is the alais cloudy_day_jane absolutely included (to a degree) in my life. And cloudy_day_jane knows it! How will that poster spin truths into lies...just stay tuned. Sentiment: Buy

    Sentiment: Buy

  • karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 15, 2015 1:09 PM Flag

    You are facing an insurmountable task currently. Truth (me) by karnut2000 • Mar 25, 2015 5:14 PM...that message had a buy sentiment. That buy sentiment was news related and included in the message I posted, Now for news of March 24, 2015 9:01 AM QTWW announced it has received another follow-on order for its fully-integrated Q-CabLITE CNG storage system from Dillon Transport, an industry leader in adopting CNG transportation solutions.
    From the Dillon website...announced it has received another follow-on order for its fully-integrated Q-CabLITE CNG storage system from Dillon Transport, an industry leader in adopting CNG transportation solutions.:::::::::::::: Now for your message of Mar 17, 2015 12:02 PM by ibmwatcher
    "Attach Parachute!!! Time to bail!!!" • People had a choice relative to the two message and those choices were ignore, accept or reject. Anyone accepting my message would have benefitted. Conversely and another situation were you should have been rejected, those that did, benefitted. There is no reasonable debate that you can produce. Will you do me the favor and be pathetic and try?

    Sentiment: Buy

  • karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 15, 2015 12:31 PM Flag

    Feelings? Certain facts do evoke feeling...I suppose. Regardless...truth over the long term, always prevails.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • therein...a meaningful and significant difference

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    karnut twenty thousand...K2K (karnut2000) here

    by karnut2000 Apr 1, 2015 8:38 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 15, 2015 12:13 PM Flag

    You thought of it, in_spite_of_it_all (3Ls) and you initiated that May 8, 2012. The original initiated Dec 15, 2007. Run along, little girl...run along.

  • Jul 17, 2010 1:10 pm when knowin2holdem posted that he was going all in, taking out a second mortgage.
    Posted on a Saturday, Friday July 16, 2010 close $44.00 or as it would appear on a long term chart. And I am not fond of you deciding to use a handle as similar to mine. Looking to confuse? I would suppose you're here to fill in for birdcatty. Excuse me for being trivial...however, my handle, since 1999. I don't post info that gets my moniker denied by Yahoo. I read one of your earlier messages about knowin2holdem's wildly reckless message and/or QTWW buy-in and you significantly underestimated that message's cost basis. I'm thorough, you not so much. Don't let the truth upset you. Be more certain and researched as to what you post is all. Just in case another cloner (karnut2ooo...with the lower case letter O) shows up...doing so isn't terribly bright and same goes for other imposters that I'm not mentioning.

  • Reply to

    message for shorts

    by karnut20000 Apr 1, 2015 8:20 PM
    karnut2000 karnut2000 Apr 1, 2015 8:22 PM Flag

    mimicking me...but I must admit you are correct about shorts are on the wrong side of this.

  • karnut2000 karnut2000 Mar 26, 2015 7:46 PM Flag

    Your reply gives me the impression you aren't comprehending what I said in a reply to archarch_60477. Which is to say, that is perfectly ok since it doesn't concern you nor does it have anything to do with AMSC. How I got to be "Shecky" from your point of view is mildly amusing.

  • karnut2000 karnut2000 Mar 26, 2015 6:31 PM Flag

    You are much like what gets flushed down peoples' toilets. What I'm talking about nothing to do with AMSC.

CNK
42.77-0.50(-1.16%)Apr 17 4:01 PMEDT