It appears that you feel all that math was necessary. I'm sure it was for all of those that fail to practice using a stop loss. Should I pity them? Take the message board poster birdcatty. When that poster was spamming at a stock board to buy gold repeatedly...gold continued it's decline. More gold spam pumps came with the indignant affirmation that stop losses were not going to be followed. Hardly see birdcatty around that board anymore. Probably got tired of all the warning reminders. Anyway...I've been posting for 15 years. That far back, there really wasn't the type of vile hatred expressed as I see today. So much is wasted in not engaging in intelligent debate. I highly doubt things will improve noticeably.
After the close today, aud1ophul made multiple offensive comments about someone's mother. It's understandable that some low-class people post on message boards. Their attacks reveal who they are!
I have 15 years of surfing message boards. ibmwatcher without any doubt and only with a distant second far behind, ibmwatcher is guilty of lying more than any other from what I've seen in 15 years. ibmwatcher is the #1 liar.
cloudy_day_jane, you are the biggest idiot I have encountered. Countless times you are handed truth, only to rant about alias usage; much in the pattern of ibmwatcher lies. I find it quietly amusing as the odds increase that you may also be ibmwatcher. This is not meant to irritate you. Your modus operandi, as fervent as it is, really does amuse me. QTWW going over $5 this year. If you'd get your head out of your _ _ _ you would have posted as much already. Deny being short QTWW...I won't believe that. GL bashing!
Sentiment: Strong Buy
For you, cloudy, everyone is ibmwatcher. Deceive your own self and continue thinking I am ibmwatcher. Your self-deception remains my levity.
ibmwatcher you are cloudy_day_jane and another 200+ basher aliases. You have lied about my identity more than 1,000 times over the past several years. You are disgusting.
Light volume boosts days to cover for shorts. Still short then see if you can wrap your scrambled brain around what I'm about to tell you. First off just like 2 + 2 = 4...it is of zero importance which person states mathematical truth. Why did I tell you that? I have to over-explain things to you since you've exhibited some irrational stupidity. Now to my point and the point being no matter which alias posts the forthcoming mathematical truth, it's not something you can scoff at by telling me I use any other alias. I fear I've already lost you. Anyway, as of March 31st there were 2,004,673 shares shorted. Today, well under 80,000 shares were traded and less than that to lower the short position. Shorts are at risk as QTWW moves higher and cheap shares become more scarce. Five weeks to cover the short position. Longs are enjoying your predicament unfold. Maybe if you pray to God, you'll get some relief. Oh sorry, that won't work. You're an atheist, so wait for the next deal announcement.
I had replied to cloudy_day_jane with the purpose of explaining the days to cover relationship wherein the Nasdaq reported short position of more than 2 million and light volume presents a problem for anyone remaining short. Included in that message was math. Also included is the basic construct wherein math is objective and number centric. Days to cover is mathematical. Math needn't be more valid or less valid by a different screen name pointing to mathematical correctness. Math's validity remains no matter whom references it. In other words to cloudy_day_jane, omit the alias-swapping BS that both ibmwatcher and you, cloudy_day_jane are so quick to rely on; such nonsense is evidence that they are incapable of reasoned discussion. How did cloudy_day_jane reply? Well, here it is, "Hey ibmwatcher, only idiots correct a typo 4 days later after making themselves look like the amateur you are. Stick to name inventing, picking stocks isn't your cup of tea." I reject that...being called ibmwatcher has nothing to do with math...because cloudy_day_jane has no educated way to respond, it's unfortunate. She can't argue the math...no one can. IMO, someone leaning more to the idiot side of thinking would never correct their typo. Do you understand, cloudy_day_jane? a) if she doesn't, she's dumber than I thought. b) she understands but enjoys being belligerent. And my message had nothing to do with PICKING stock. It was about daily volume, the short position and reminding shorts that QTWW will be over $3 soon.
correcting my typo...light volume boosts days to cover for shorts. See if you can have your scrambled brain grasp all of what I'm about to tell you. First off just like 2 + 2 = 4...it is of zero importance which person states mathematical truth. Why did I tell you that? I have to over-explain things to you since you've exhibited some real stupidity. Now to my point and the point being no matter which alias posts the forthcoming mathematical truth, it's not something you can scoff at by telling me I use any other alias. I fear I've already lost you. Anyway...as of 3/31/2015 there were 2,004,673 shares shorted. Today, well under 80,000 shares were traded and less than that to lower the short position. Shorts are at risk as QTWW moves higher and low-priced shares are scarce. 25 sessions to cover the short position. Longs are enjoying your predicament unfold. Maybe if you pray to God, you'll get some relief. OH...sorry that won't work. You're an atheist.
Looking at today's 1 day chart, strong volume for the day kicked in right at the low of the day, $2.90 to $2.93 a bit after NOON EST.
You are terrible at math. Earlier you demonstrated that. I pushed aside your earlier lame-brained thinking thusly...your contention that I "own 98% of the aliases" and done in the frame of a far bigger liar, ibmwatcher. So this to you cloudy_day_jane I am going to work the math. To arrive at 98% are mine, there needs to be at the minimum 50 aliases posting. So you are the only alias being the other person...leaving 49 mine or 98% mine for the 98 percentage you claim as accurate. To summate, list my 49 aliases, or how you see my 49 aliases. • • • And what did you do...you failed! You wimped out. And with your simple-mindedness, you persist telling me again I am " a loser with no life " which also has been rejected... I replied to you 03 -25 at
6:16PM, a typical fact-free reply comes from cloudy_day_jane " you really don't have a life" and yet the obvious truth is the alias cloudy_day_jane absolutely is included (to a degree) in my life. And cloudy_day_jane knows it! I detest liars...and do not give them the floor without being rejected. On to another subject you bring up karnut2000 has 9400 posts. My alias began September of 1999. Well over 5,000 days ago...I'm averaging fewer than 2 messages a day. Your singular alias and presuming you only have one began October 6, 2012 and your next message will be your 4,500th!!!!!! You are averaging nearly 5 a day...more than double my average. As for you tallying 70,000 messages to me with the assumption I have so many other aliases...to be fair I can say all your aliases tally over 140,000. You so suck at lying if you think you have a scintilla of credibility. Watch QTWW move over three dollars.