After the "JAC Capital's proposed acquisition of its RF Power business" deal clears, then: "NXP Semiconductor's proposed merger with Freescale Semiconductor (FSL) is contingent upon the sale of its RF Power business." That's what the news says anyway. Never heard of FSL but it's a huge co and looks based in the USA (not sure)...
actually Chartmill has a '0' rating on a lot of stocks you and I both wouldn't figure on. I'm new to the sw and won't spend the time studying the parameters because it's based on TA and I don't do TA... Suppose it's useful for a short term perspective but I'm not short term on MU...
Like your American spirit iskie! Too bad the rest of the country's asleep at the wheel. Hopefully the conservatives will show themselves at election time. This country can't take another Demo in office, especially Hillary or Bernie Sanders.
And MU and the industry overall "has stated" over n over that 3D Nand and X-point to put it conservatively will not be "slowing down" MU!
There you go again! This is not the SWKS msg bd and this is not the Four Horsemen msg bd! This is the MU msg bd. Regarding your question on losers, just look at SWKS 6 month chart - steadily dropping!
Nice try cheetah, LOL! Look at SWKS 6 month chart! Need I say anything more, ha!
You now own (ZERO) MU shrs of stock, have no Options and not even Short on MU. And this hasn't changed during the past year that you've been molesting this msg bd. So, why are you STILL HERE here bashing the MU stock and it's investors on this msg bd?
Your above reply ( Nov 21, 2015 1:46 PM) is in fact the first time in over a year I've ever seen you elaborate let alone substartiate your reasoning on MU! So, kudos for having finally done something right on this msg bd! If you have to continue posting on a stock you don't own and don't plan to, then the above format would be a welcome change. (as for "facts", not all of your points are facts)
OK cheetah boy, and SWKS is a 1 - 10!
Here's Chartmill's rating on SWKS:
We assign a technical rating of 1 out of 10 to SWKS. SWKS has been an average performer in the overall market. Also recent evolutions are not that positive: both the medium and short term time frames give negative signs."
Nobody has doubted SWKS has been a better stock to ride than MU during the past year. My point to you has and is always the same. Quit your chronic daily, weekly, yearly bashing of MU, leave the MU msg bd and stay on the SWKS msg bd. You haven't been fooling anyone here that knows anything about MU or actually invested in it. You have a very tired weak agenda here that no one wants!
Harvard lawyer educated social community service Obama fantasizes over being a World leader, not leader of the USA. That's been apparent since he sweet talked us into office seven years ago... He wants to be every bodies friend, except apple pie conservative Americans.
Interesting observation. Could just be it's tracking the overall market. I'd suggest tracking/stacking a number of stocks along with MU on a comparable chart. My guess you will see the same similarity.
It might be a short term "positive development" for the MU stock but long term a very bad move!
Your original point was MU's earnings have been down/aren't going anywhere while SWKS is up/better. My point: the overwhelming majority of semi stocks performance HAS BEEN DOWN THIS YEAR. Wall Street Journal just put out an article on it today. "The PHLX Semiconductor Index is still down about 4% for the year...."
SWKS and a few semis are an exception but semis as a whole have gone down this year. OK, let's just revise thist from what semis have done for the year to - what they've been doing in the past couple months (down to sideways). As far as SWKS goes as a supplier for AAPL, in case you haven't noticed AAPL's slowed down, the stock's down and no sure bet going forward. And if you don't think expanding earnings is a #$%$ shoot for all semis going forward then be my guest blow your whole retirement next egg right now on SWKS! AA
Cheetah, you addressed nothing of substance from what I just posted. You slam MU's X-Point prospects but ignore what's right around the corner - earnings starting from 3D Nand. You do nothing but dodge substantive questions/issues on this bd while chronically cheerleading an old worn out short/bear story on MU. Oh, and you say you stay on this bd to protect people from the Bull side, ha! That'd be fine if you provided any substance!
You can still do your MU bear Options and/or Short strategies without posting on this bd bashing the stock. And don't waste time telling us you don't short MU - only Options - your a Bear just the same. Stay on your beloved 4 horseman msg bds and leave MU alone. You serve no purpose here other than your own selfish agenda. kg
"earnings are on the decline "
All semi earnings have been on a decline! Supply/Pricing problems don't last forever. Cyclical business and/or oligopoly of the 'Big Three' (whichever you believe). AAPL's still selling phones & gizmos just fine and will continue. China wants our products bad! MU's in the thick of this and has disruptive technology/products getting big attention. What's not to like Mid to Long term! MU earnings will pick up by NLT mid-2016, so, rather than spread fear about what's already happened, let's hear what you have to say about going forward 2Q 2016 to mid-2016.
So far I have confronted jekdc once. If he keeps doing the annoying #$%$ and filthy mouth thing, I'll do it again. I pretty much ignore this #$%$. jekdc's too new here to get my feathers up really.
Oh, I see, so you've been molesting wisecracks on this MU bd everyday, every week, every month, for the past year, waiting for it to crash to "$13.50"! I see. That's your strategy. And this is because X-Point is "unproven". X-Point's way off in the future. You've been here every frigin day forever trashing MU short term, mid term, no time frame ever mentioned, etc. This is the first time I've even heard you give your thinking reasoning!
You fail to mention 3D Nand is on deck now for revenues showing NLT mid-2016. The 3D Nand story is joint INTC/MU. That's what Longs are waiting for. What's your paranoia all about on 3D Nand, huh? Tell us that...
I don't think MU should do this (China State owned minority stake in MU) because once China's in the door, they'll steal MU blind. This is how it starts. Never mind INTC's doing it. INTC has more leverage. USA will sell stuff to China, not give it away...
Another very informative post from you cheetah, ha! Tell us WHY and with some substance you think MU goes lower MID to LONG TERM... kg
thx for your take tommy. Helps to know how old timers see TSRA. How long have you been holding TSRA? This started out a hopeful day trade for me. Now turned captive Long. I'll be in research mode on this going forward until I get a solid feel for how long this will take to play out for me.
Kg2931 (TSRA Long 1500 Shrs @ $36.80 CB $55,200 held since 11/04/2015)