A few valid points, but it is not a corporations duty or responsibility to fund governments. Efficient markets dictate they do all they can to escape draconian taxes. When govt's over tax or over regulate money will always flow to where it can be used more effectively. That's why companies like Amazon have flourished. That's why so many internet companies have generated billions in wealth, by flying under the regulators heavy hand. You can't have it both ways. Wealth is not created by govt. With one of the highest corp tax rates in the world, American corporations are being responsible to their shareholders by fleeing to more efficient markets. The US could create huge revenues and generate many jobs if they reduced corp rates and allowed companies to reinvest money in America, money made and already taxed in foreign lands. And talk about thieves, Al Gore has made many millions from govt handouts for his "sky is falling" refrain about global warming while his carbon footprint is orders of magnitude larger than any of ours.
Which asylum did you get let out of? The UN alters scientific reports, which is the epitome of dishonest research, but that's okay because it serves your agenda. i suppose there is no point in telling you the earth was warmer when Julius Caesar ruled the known world. You have to understand where rights come from and how they are given to men before you could possible have any understanding of what a women's right is. And you support a man that "handpicked" Joe Biden to be the vice president of the US. You are so dumb you can't even spell your name correctly. DumbInsane79 would work much better for you.
We could always take all the welfare queens and put them to work as replacements for the illegals. Of course it won't happen because personal responsibility died off several decades ago.
You sound like a frustrated choir boy that wasn't fondled and feels left out. A priest isn't doing damage to this company, the head of a hedge fund is. Father O'Malley can stand at his pulpit and rail against LGND all he wants and he isn't going to impact this stock one iota. When the head of one of the most successful hedge funds in the world rails against you, that's another story. Get your head on straight, boy, and prepare for the day Lemelson has to buy all that stock back.
Maybe if you spent less time on your knees in front of Chris Mathewson, you might learn something. Anyone with a brain knows that the real unemployment number, the one that counts is U6. That number remains at 14%, barely moving across all 6 years of the Obama dictatorship. Labor force participation is stalled at 63% , the highest in 35 years. 200k jobs were created in July ...but it was actually 700k, mostly part time, as 500k full time jobs were also lost.
Instead of getting a tingle between your thighs when Obama speaks, maybe if you actually did a little research, you might not come across as such as idiot.
So ... a half dozen Yahooers form a trend? ??? I never realized all I had to do was look at what message boards say and then do the opposite. I'll be rich in no time.
I'm long LGND and don't like to see negative articles either, but Lemelson Capital is very highly respected and preists typically are much better educated than anyone that ever tried to teach you the difference between lose/ loose, loser/looser. Just what the heck does "loosing the short side" mean anyway? Then again if you meant "losing the short side", that doesn't make any sense either.
Now I understand why you don't known what day it is. You are a liberal baboon that hates first and then ... well ...there is no second, that would require intelligence.
Actually, it's pretty much doing what it always does, that is, drop a bit for a couple weeks after div. If things go as they normally do, it should stabilize here and then drift up a bit. Seeing you at 10 sounds good, that way I'll never have to see you.
Even if book value is up .50 this thing is so far over book that they'd be insane not to do an SPO.
And the scourge of well diversified funds is that while some stocks go up, others go down. For widows and orphans that may work out well.
You must be one of those insane people that the institutions were forced to put back out on the streets years ago, right?
Those poor red states would love for the blue state union of socialist buffoons to splinter off into their own country. Of course the reds states would have to put up fences to keep you out when there weren't any jobs or tax money to pay for your welfare society in your communist nirvana.
If you had enough sense to research before you opened your mouth, you'd realize Reagan had Dem majorities in the House and Senate. If you were capable of reading old newspapers or you were old to enough to remember, you'd recall that every Reagan budget was thrown back by the Dems until many billions were added on. Unlike Genghis Obama, former presidents lived by the Constitution whereby Congress controls the budgets. Of course your socialist teachers in your public school probably never taught you that, you poor excuse for human flesh.
I guess Bush was to blame when the Iranian embassy was stormed, right? I suppose Bush was to blame when Libya blew up that plane over Lockerbie, right? If you weren't on your knees under Obama's desk all he time you might learn a little about history, you poor excuse for human protoplasm.
As long as they fight among themselves, I agree. But that's not the case. More importantly, if we do anything it should be to eradicate them all and be done with this nonsense.
Actually he doesn't looses anything, except maybe his pants when he unbuckles his belt. Now, he may actually lose a lot but "looses a lot" makes you look stupid.
You are about as stupid as stupid can be and don't have much compassion, (you voted for Obama twice, didn't you?) . Add up the under employed and those that have quit looking and you have 25% of the economy gone.