How do longs feel about current state of MNTA?
Market is seeing highs not seen since 2007 and here MNTA is under 13? In retrospect was hype realistic(Dew's RMF pumps suggesting 40, 60, best case 80)?
Pretty horrible long and short term investment. Dew Dilligence claims he protects investors from scams. What a joke. Who needs protection from scams when he can con people into buying good old fashioned dogs with fleas?
Scammer guys beware of him. He is out to take the money of newbie biotech investors. He has a ton of duplicate ID's(which are all really him or his associates) which appear to confirm his views
He sounds credible but isn't. His pumps have done horribly(by design). Heed my warning or get burned.
It is a very ominous sign for longs that Dew Dilligence is covering this issue. His stock picking record is horrendous(MNTA & GTCB were last 2 major pump jobs). Beware this poster. It would be impossible to be this bad at picking stocks. He is a no doubt a scammer
Anyone care to initiate a poll to get to the bottom of this thing?
P.S. - my vote is scammer. Just not possible to be this wrong, this consistently, and keep sticking to it, even when it becomes obvious how horrendous the investments are in the past/most likely will be in the future
He's either the smartest guy with the worst luck picking stocks in history or a short masquerading as a long(my guess). Why do people follow him religiously? His track record is abysmal. How many times has he pumped MNTA and been dead wrong? Just a few months ago, he said he was "comfortable adding at these prices", and the pps was ~ 14.50!!!
Those boards should be shut down for the good of the public
still pumping MNTA after all these years. of horrible performance. Sad, What a loser.
Not all of these ID's are scammers - some are just plain stupid. They follow Dew like mindless drones. OldBerkley probably falls into this category. OB, so what price do you expect to get on the "impending MNTA buyout" ?????????
Let me guess 40, 60, 80. perhaps more??
What a joke. Once again guys, beware of his predictions. He is either a fool or a scammer. You choose.
Either way, you lose.
Obvious answer is Madofff but closer than most people imagine. Beware of his pumping. His RMF has cost newbie biotech investors MILLIONS. He is now pumping MNTA based on 105-b activity. Really? For sake of comparison, when mEnox got approval, he predicted the stock price would go to 80. What's she at now, Dew, 15???? His last pump, GTCB, was a total bust. He and his "followers" lost 97% of their original investment, yet many are back. Or are they? His multiple ID's make it seem like he has a solid following, but I would contend floblu14, oldberkeley, and pollyvonwog, are all extensions of this scam.
Innocent biotech investors beware, these scammers are out to take your money, and they have no conscience about doing so.
Now he is pumping MNTA based on 105-b activity?? Sounds like his 80 PPS prediction post mEnox approval. Someone should break his fingers so he can't type anymore. Hasn't he hurt enough good people already?
It would be in the best interest of the public to shut down the IHub boards. They have been used for years now by scammers such as Dew. Case in point is his "projection" of MNTA's valuation post mEnox approval in the sole generic scenario (which MNTA enjoyed for well over a year), which he put at $98/share.
He claims to save people from biotech scams and then makes outrageous and knowingly false statements like these. There are many examples on IHub of people who bought into his bull and have been burned badly. So what is it he is saving people from, exactly? Who will save them from him?
The guy who predicted that MNTA's stock price would go to 80 on mEnox approval says there is a > 60% chance approval will happen this year. Does that make you feel better?
<<BTW have you figured what could be the motive of this consortium>>
No. Maybe the world will catch a break and DD will get hit by a bus one of these days. One can only hope.......one thing is for sure, it's insidious, this consortium
<<If he went away the best board in biotech would disappear fairly quickly.>>
Actually this would be a GOOD thing. I would contend Dew has done much more harm than good to the small investor, many of whom are not savvy enough to recognize that on many occasions what he presents as factual statements are in fact complete WAG's - and DEAD wrong. Which would be fine, except that many follow his advice blindly and get hurt badly because of it. Now, you could say, "that is their fault", and of course that is true, but if you witnessed people getting burned by him time and time again, wouldn't you feel obligated to expose him for what he is, and is not? That is what I think IG is trying to do, but at times his message gets lost because he is a bit extreme. Still, IMO his message is 100% correct and accurate.
The thing is - as a small and relatively uninformed biotech investor - he is not your friend. The problem with this is, many more readers of that board fall into that camp than the reverse.