Who are you? Started on board against Cur then back and forth now you're and effing cheerleader saying completely idiotic and BASELESS comments. Before your next post which will be all too soon. Try doing at least some small amount of DD. If you can't or choose not to then spare us please. So are 60% of your holdings in CUR? If not why say you would?
Just read article - agree a nice view of the results to date and shows improvement to multiple cases not just Ted H
my $.02 - agreed the board should include views pro and against that are based in data and genuine opinions that are not meant to mislead. Playing both sides s/b prohibited unless there is a genuine change in heart. Ideally the cheer-leading s/b held in check. Excitement is one thing but wild ass prognostications only create hype that serves no real purpose. I guess the operative word for all posts is that they s/b "genuine"
I agree and made the same point last week and was accused of not being nice and was told I didn't need to be on it...talk about juvenile! This board is an embarrassment. But you are right the company is or may be on the edge of a something that if successful will give hope to many, be groundbreaking and will redefine medicine
I believe this was my message last week. This board is an embarrassment. Its not a matter of being critical of others but rather wanting to have intelligent and meaningful dialog whether pro or con Cur. The current dribble in this board renders it useless in that regard since you have to go through too much BS to get there.
Thanks for the support bnord. Good to see that some people don't view intelligent commentary as an attack. I hope that expecting meaningful comments either way is not asking too much.
This board is an embarrassment. Its a waste of time. Most of the comments are either baseless rah rah cheer leading or worse yet coming from someone or has multiple personalities and has comments both pro and against CUR. Then the juvenile comments come and the board value is totally lost. Tom Genna was a luxury but you don;t need someone of his caliber to have an intelligent dialog about the stock. Thoughtful comments about the science with interpretation of events/comments (Garr, et al...) that are informative and interesting whether or not ultimately correct is the goal. Even the shorts comments are acceptable they have an agenda but are at least consistent and you know where they stand. I would love to have a board of comments that are at least have the intention of value added regardless of where you stand on the prospects of CUR.