Mon, Jul 28, 2014, 9:23 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 7 mins.

Recent

% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

FAB Universal Corp. Common Stoc Message Board

lbcb321 599 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 25, 2014 11:31 PM Member since: Jun 4, 2010
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Where was that big blowout quarter you promised, ditzy? I never got the pop, so I didn't get to short them. See what GS had to say about institutions holding AAPL?

    "Apple's not so hot with some fund managers. A report from Goldman Sachs says Apple is one of the most underweighted stock among large cap fund managers."

    The retail fools can be led by the nose to follow the bandwagon too long, but the big fund managers can't get out all at once and are a precursor to upcoming movement. The fact they are underweight at these over-bought prices should tell you something.

    AAPL misses the revenue number they had already guided much lower and continue to guide future estimates lower. TOO funny.

    Google: apple guides lower

    EVERY quarter you see the same headline of Apple guiding lower. What a crock! If you take 6 month out numbers estimates, Apple hasn't beat guidance for years. They are constantly guiding lower for the upcoming quarter so they can beat sometimes and miss sometimes. Can't believe they missed the revenue number after guiding it so much lower.

    Put your rose-colored glasses back on and tell us how great they are. They will have trouble hitting their 2012 highs again now. Guiding for $37B to $40B now for next quarter revenue when consensus is over $40B now. They will talk guidance down to $37.5B and post $37.8B to "beat". And ditzy will fall for it and say what a growth company they are.

  • Reply to

    Check out ivc short CBAK

    by ditzil Jul 22, 2014 9:18 AM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 22, 2014 11:14 AM Flag

    Just got my confirmation. I took my quick 10%. At 11:08 I covered at $3.965 in two fills of 1400 and 1100 shares. Look it up. Yet another successful trade in real-time while you suckers sit on your dead money.

  • Reply to

    This stock is ready to explode?

    by barneyspeedway Jul 14, 2014 6:19 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 22, 2014 11:00 AM Flag

    =Gotta wonder what kind of an idiot would bid up the price of this stock.

    You are subject to the whims of a master now. Fife received 5M more shares as settlement of the lawsuit and to solidify his vested interest, he had to purchase 2M more at .15. This gave them $300K. It isn't enough to implement any business plan and begin manufacturing anything, but Fife wants them to stay alive long enough for more pump & dump campaigns so he can cash out his millions of shares.

    How come there hasn't been an amended 13G from St. George Investments (Fife) showing the additional 5M + 2M shares he picked up?

    The lies continued in the last 10-Q. Some good trades out there today... I'll revisit the 10-Q when I have a chance. Let's just say this is a pure sucker's play as it has been for years.

  • Reply to

    Terrible First QTR

    by misterjer2000 Jul 21, 2014 1:35 AM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 22, 2014 10:48 AM Flag

    = Most of the people who buy the kiosk license's have no interest in deploying a kiosk. Once they have the license the products can be purchased and then pirated for a nice profit.

    I didn't want to bring that up as I would be attacked as biased, but that is an interesting proposition. Perhaps they really did sell the licenses, but that is why they were never deployed and they can't provide the locations. To expand upon your premise... perhaps they are forbidden from selling more licenses and lost the right to the content after being caught pirating content. That would be an interesting development.

    Yes, folks... that one is in the pure conjecture category and clearly an opinion. I demarcate fact from opinion yet the delusional always claim I am "lying" by giving an opinion.

    Perhaps that explains how they could sell zero licenses on what was such a lucrative part of their business and shown it generated $29M of the $54M in cash from operations raised in 2013. You don't just walk away from that business completely even if you are "transitioning" to a different model. How come no conference call so they can be asked if the zero license sales were there choice or if they lost the right to sell licenses and the accompanying content?

  • Reply to

    Timelines for Fab meeting with NYSE MLQP

    by vvrm Jul 16, 2014 12:12 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 22, 2014 10:39 AM Flag

    =The central thesis for Ibcb for the first 4-5 months of 2014 is that FAB would go dark.

    That lie again? I already showed you many of the posts refuting that and there are many more:

    Reply to
    10K Audit......
    by joebigbuck •Mar 4, 2014 3:57 PM
    lbcb321 • Mar 5, 2014 5:40 PM Remove

    =With today's news I think it's a given FAB will file their 10K in a timely manner.

    Dream on. We will know soon enough. If they are stupid enough to put out a 10-K where all the language is watered-down and wishy-washy, it will do more harm than waiting for the investigation to be completed.

    Want another one?

    Reply to
    march 31st
    by leron14277 •Mar 20, 2014 5:46 PM
    lbcb321 • Mar 20, 2014 8:46 PM Remove

    If you think FAB is filing, you just haven't been paying attention. IF they do, it is going to be such watered down language that it will mean nothing and probably do more harm than going dark. We will know soon enough.

    And yet another:

    Reply to
    FAB Redemption Coming Soon
    by stockbraveheart •Mar 24, 2014 10:36 PM
    lbcb321 • Mar 27, 2014 9:02 AM Remove

    4 days to 10-K due and 5 days for NT 10-K. I'll be home by then. Can hardly wait to see what happens. A watered-down 10-K or going dark... which will it be and which will hurt them the most?

    And there are many more. An option was always to put out a 10-K with all of the supporting information proving the allegations removed. That is the route they chose.

    Once more I provide the documented proof exposing yet another of your lies.

  • lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 22, 2014 10:33 AM Flag

    "I give the truth and a consistent message whether I am long, short or no current position. I don't pump when I'm long and bash when I'm short."

    Yes, Ben... (or do you prefer Benjamin?) I give a consistent message unlike fools like qdog that go back and forth pumping and bashing depending on their position. You gave part of the message as you continued stalking me on other boards, but as usual... twisted my message.

    =Since when is he long

    I answered that in the post you twisted as I answered that question on the ABAT board:

    "December 8, 2011
    Let me make one thing perfectly clear... I am not pumping ABAT by any means. I think there are some serious unresolved issues. I am a student of human nature and I believe there will be a pop for the factory grand opening. I will be selling Monday or Tuesday, but think anything under .30 is a buy through the close tomorrow."

    Some one was giving me a hard time about shorting ABAT and I pointed out I made more money on long trades than short trades there. Even when I was long, I did not pump them and still gave my honest assessment of them.

    I have a long, long track record of successful trading and consistent, honest messages while you are caught in lies over and over. Pssst... you used your benjaminterrywilliams alias again right after claiming you only used ONE ID. Too danged funny what a complete buffoon you are.

  • Reply to

    Check out ivc short CBAK

    by ditzil Jul 22, 2014 9:18 AM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 22, 2014 10:17 AM Flag

    =ABAT is running above as well.

    Above what? There was a large sale followed by a smaller buy at 30% above the sale price. Why don't you actually see what the trades are before you post such nonsense. Still trying to con the ignorant.

  • Reply to

    Check out ivc short CBAK

    by ditzil Jul 22, 2014 9:18 AM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 22, 2014 10:00 AM Flag

    You bet... what a great trade. I have been shorting this about every other day. Goes up early and drops throughout the day. I will give you today's trade straight from the confirmation:

    Short 2500 CBAK @ $4.40 filled at 09:37. It was all one fill so I'll bet you can find it on a Time and Sales Report.

    Looking to make 10% to 15% again today. Still can't get anything to fill for an acceptable price on the Puts. Just wait until their next financials when all the BAK International assets are backed-out! More nonsense, ditzy... how come you never include the time frame for a trade instead of coming back later and saying I was "wrong" when the profit has already been booked? So many great trades these past couple years and you are STILL down on your AAPL as it has never touched its 2012 high.

    Hoping to short AAPL after hours. Watch them pop from the delusional and then the institutions will begin selling again. Mark this one, ditzy... AAPL will drop at least 5% from their aftermarket high to the low.

  • Reply to

    Joel messed it up....

    by altaga47 Jul 21, 2014 12:34 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 11:34 PM Flag

    =you made money on dishonesty

    I made more money long than short on ABAT. What was dishonest about it? Unlike 99% of the people on these boards, I give the truth and a consistent message whether I am long, short or no current position. I don't pump when I'm long and bash when I'm short.

    Here is what I had to say about ABAT while I was long:

    December 8, 2011
    Let me make one thing perfectly clear... I am not pumping ABAT by any means. I think there are some serious unresolved issues.

    I am a student of human nature and I believe there will be a pop for the factory grand opening. I will be selling Monday or Tuesday, but think anything under .30 is a buy through the close tomorrow.

    So tell me how I was dishonest? You don't think all the delusional pumpers making up lies and spewing misinformation was dishonest? You don't think making up a spoof ID of mine is dishonest?

    You have some serious mental issues. Seek help.

  • Reply to

    Timelines for Fab meeting with NYSE MLQP

    by vvrm Jul 16, 2014 12:12 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 4:22 PM Flag

    =It's specifically addressed in the 10K

    No it isn't. Show me.

  • Reply to

    Timelines for Fab meeting with NYSE MLQP

    by vvrm Jul 16, 2014 12:12 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 4:21 PM Flag

    =Clearly Zhang applied for the bond BEFORE the acquisition

    Bull. Even IF true, he knew at the time it was disbursed he could not pledge his shares as collateral and he knew it would be required to be carried on the books and properly reported.

    You are full of it, Joe.

  • Reply to

    Timelines for Fab meeting with NYSE MLQP

    by vvrm Jul 16, 2014 12:12 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 4:19 PM Flag

    =We've already seen youre price predictions about NQ with the auditor change.

    Really? More made up nonsense from you. Show me my "price prediction" on NQ after the auditor change. I didn't make any price predictions and you can't show one.

    =(FAB will go dark)

    Yet another lie. The prediction was FAB will go dark OR file a watered-down 10-K. They chose the latter as they removed all language proving transgressions and their 10-Q not only continued to walk-back all these previous false statements... it stated they abandoned the business model that supposedly made them all that cash.

    Your lies continue.

  • Reply to

    Timelines for Fab meeting with NYSE MLQP

    by vvrm Jul 16, 2014 12:12 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 2:48 PM Flag

    = It's up 25% in 2 days based soley on this new development.

    LOL! It couldn't be that now there is a very real threat of them being halted/suspended that the shorts want out? Your black and white world continues to be flawed. Let's look at the new short interest reports when this period is done and we will see if it is new buying interest or short-covering.

    "SOLELY on this new development." Pretty amazing you think that all trading is done based on ONE piece of information.

    "the market is more than open to a company changing auditors."

    Any other delusional fool want to claim this is a neutral point and people are open to it?

    Unbelievable the amount of nonsense you spew. I can hardly wait for trading to begin. I have two predictions:

    1) You will claim to be buying more as the price tanks.

    2) qdog will claim to buy at 3 pennies above the low of the day when we all know he never got out before it was halted.

    I know, I know... I make these "predictions" at the risk of being called Captain Obvious.

  • Reply to

    Timelines for Fab meeting with NYSE MLQP

    by vvrm Jul 16, 2014 12:12 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 2:39 PM Flag

    =If I could get 16M at 11% and knew I could use that money to invest in a business with 80% margins and growing rapidly you're darn straight I'd take the money.

    More nonsense for the poster child of the delusional. Show us, Joe. Where was that money "invested"? If they are sitting on 7X more cash than that, then the FACT is the money has not been used at all. They aren't JUST paying 11% interest. They paid $500K upfront. They received $15.8M proceeds from a $16.3M offering. They are paying 11% interest on the entire 16.3M.

    If they have so much cash, why didn't the BOD just say the bond issue was void since it did not have proper approval and return $15.8M and call it even? Why are they going to pay back $16.3M PLUS INTEREST in installments when they are sitting on $100M in cash?

    You go on believing all these ridiculous premises from Chinese frauds while anybody with a lick of common sense knows it just doesn't make any sense logically.

    You don't hand over $13M to somebody because you want an option to buy a building. If anything... you put it in escrow. Most people here have bought a house, land or commercial building. I'll bet you not many people have given earnest money directly to the seller. It has gone into an escrow account or trust account and is bound by contract law in how it gets disbursed in case the transaction does not go through. FAB didn't even have a sales contract... it was just an option in case they wanted the building and they handed over $13M to somebody and now can't get it back? If that isn't blatant violation of fiduciary duty... I don't know what is.

    Phantom cash here and there for deposits and a bond when they haven't used the cash. Something is very wrong here and you are delusional if you can't see it.

  • Reply to

    Timelines for Fab meeting with NYSE MLQP

    by vvrm Jul 16, 2014 12:12 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 2:24 PM Flag

    =Ah, the 17.8M was returned and verified by a third party in their "unqualified" recently filed 10K

    How do you know? They auditor-shopped and found someone who would look the other way and take their word for everything. We saw the proof they failed to cooperate with verification of bank accounts. Let's see your proof that the new auditor verified accounts along with the aging and trail of the funds so they couldn't be shuffled from account to account.

    =It bought them time, and it was a firm contract/option to buy at a fixed price.

    If it was a "firm contract/option" as you state then how come the money wasn't placed in escrow? Who did the $13M go to? How come it wasn't returned when they changed their mind on January 7, 2014?

    =Just because you fell for it don't expect others to be so stupid.

    Ditto, Joe. I can back up what I say while you keep repeating the details of The Zhang/Spencer/Busshaus Scam. They completely changed their previous filings. They don't believe it anymore and are walking back what they originally claimed yet YOU still believe it. TOO funny.

  • Reply to

    Joel messed it up....

    by altaga47 Jul 21, 2014 12:34 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 2:16 PM Flag

    =1/3 of all cars built in China will have to be plugins

    What does that have to do with the common shares of an abandoned US holding company whose Chinese subsidiaries made small batteries for consumer goods and low-quality e-bikes?

    Is your premise really... "1/3 of all cars built in China will have to be plugins; therefore, the common shares of Advanced Battery Technologies Inc. will go up in value even though the company has been dark for years and an SEC revocation is imminent".

    Is that REALLY your premise?

    Wow.

  • Reply to

    ABAT: The Alibaba IPO ...

    by twist.nrev Jul 14, 2014 8:36 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 2:07 PM Flag

    =Then why the Court Cases........ABAT has to be a worthy Entity

    Show us anything from the court cases declaring... "ABAT has been proven to be a worthy entity".

    It is just the opposite. The judge used extremely harsh language describing them and said she had half a mind to call the SEC herself on them. They are a fraud and have abandoned their US holding company which is not only perfectly legal in China... it is REQUIRED. The CEO of a Chinese company has a fiduciary responsibility to the Chinese company and NOT to the foreign holding company.

    =Pure Fraud is being committed.

    It sure is. Hopefully the SEC will act soon and put us all out of your misery.

  • SEC Charges Penny Stock Company CEO and Purported Business Partner for Defrauding Investors With False Press Releases

    I read that and thought sure I would be reading about Sauer and his cronies. Not this time. Did you see that one, Dieter and Ana? You had better be careful with all your false press releases about beginning production you have released for YEARS. You don't have enough cash to implement any business plan and manufacture anything.

    They are up a penny again... must have sent another email full of lies to their mailing list. Can anybody confirm this? I don't get the emails any more since I replied to one of them challenging what was stated and said I believed it to be false information.

    Somebody should share the emails with the board. It is illegal to provide material information to a few (mailing list) and not release it to the public as a whole through a Reg FD compliant method. I'm sure the SEC would like to see what he is telling the delusional while hiding it from the general public.

  • Reply to

    ABAT: The Alibaba IPO ...

    by twist.nrev Jul 14, 2014 8:36 PM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 10:03 AM Flag

    Another 3:00 A.M. post by twisty. Do they know you are conning people on fraud stocks while at work?

    He says he is a security guard at a hospital, but I'll bet he really cleans bedpans.

  • Reply to

    Terrible First QTR

    by misterjer2000 Jul 21, 2014 1:35 AM
    lbcb321 lbcb321 Jul 21, 2014 9:56 AM Flag

    =sitting on a $100 million in cash

    Sure they are... how come they refused to verify it so their previous auditor walked away? Oh, that's right... it was FAB's choice to FIRE their auditor. That's it... that's the ticket. And, of course, there were NO DISAGREEMENTS. Just amazing what these frauds get away with. When the rats abandon the sinking ship, it is always for "personal reasons" and no auditors ever have disagreements with their clients when they are let go. TOO danged funny!

FU
3.07

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.