the truth is that on 9/30/13 the book value of the company was greater than $10 per share., Can you deny this? If you can, let's hear it.
Now the company has gone dark, the devious depths of the SEC involvement with the scheister brand of slime, however there is information that the subsidiary companies remain as going concerns and are likely doing well. Do you have any proof of otherwise?
does this unique numerology have something to do with the spiritual and the
metaphysical? After observing that wassail rbt on the board, I am certain that there is more than something weird about this sequence of events we are observing.
indeed, the PD.TO listing for this stock is 5.53 (CAD). The CAD projected to require 1.32 to purchase the USD and the speculators are, of course, buzzards. The currency play on this stock is somewhat unique and worth a watch for those with an interest on the buzzardly creeps that are in the play. It's making money the old fashioned way.
and fyi, google statol dividend, to view this for yourself.
However it appears that the NOK 1.80 dividend for Q-1 will be paid in converted USD on Aug 27. Expect this to be $.22.
The CAD tremendously cheap at 1.30 per USD. The last time I recall seeing this exchange rate was 2008 after John Mcain, the Azbrain stated there was no recession and his economic buddy Phil Graham referred to Americans as "sissies." Funny how the more things change the more they remain the same. I bought PDS at $2 then and it has worked out nicely. The dividend then was at 10% rate.
I, rbt, never say "buy". I do not suggest romance or investment to anyone. I do point out that the most recent book value is greater than $10, and that each of the 10 subsidiary entities of the consolidated CHNG are "going concerns".
You, rbt, are a devious slime-bag as is plain for anyone to see.
book value is book value. If you recall, SGAS went at 70% of book value. Each of the entities is a going concern and if you pay attention, the subsidiary vie are actually expanding. Have you heard of the lng bunker station of the river Yangtze? $26 million cost construction accruing to our ownership interest. rbt you should read more. don't be so lazy. I mean you fail to give your pal, jjjclan the time of day. This is very disrespectful.
really now.... rbt seems to be having an affect on you. The $number you should envision, not with standing a CH 7, sits in the topper one-half of the book value amount. And.... that eventual number will be diminished by the army of attorneys, their assistants, their per diems, ad naseum. But consider yourself rear-ended by the slime likes of rbt if the eventual number is less than $5 per share.
Delaware Code § 220
Under § 220, “[a]ny stockholder, in person or by attorney or other agent, shall, upon written demand under oath stating the purpose thereof, have the right during the usual hours for business to inspect for any proper purpose, and to make copies and extracts from … [t]he corporation’s stock ledger, a list of its stockholders, and its other books and records.” The Delaware Court of Chancery has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes concerning stockholder inspection demands.
On 11/1/10 HRBN announces that the CEO Tianfu Yang is taking the company private at an announced share price of $24 per share.
The share price had tumbled in USA due to articles claiming “fraud” as was the case for most PRC reverse mergers.
On 11/30/10 HRBN reports on SEC 13-G that a group of ABAX affiliates have purchased 1,692,020 shares representing 5.4% of the outstanding shares of HRBN stock.
The Statement on Schedule 13G was filed by and on behalf of:
Abax Lotus Ltd. (Cayman Islands) Abax Jade Ltd. (Cayman Islands) Abax Global Opportunities Fund (Cayman Islands) Abax Upland Fund LLC (Delaware) Abax Arhat Fund (Cayman Islands) Abax Claremont Ltd (Cayman Islands) Abax Global Capital (Cayman Islands) AGC3 Ltd (Cayman Islands) Abax Global Capital (Hong Kong) Abax Nai Xin A Ltd (Cayman Islands) and Xiang Don (g) Yang.
as far as I can tell from edgar 13g reports the following are the biggest owners
Yong Hui Li owns 15%
Qinan Ji owns 15%
ABAX Lotus owns 6.2%
I say this because I believe when these major owners sell they are required to report. There appear to be no reports of their having sold. The simple point being: If their stock is worth zero as contended by rbtsherman, why oh why would they retain ownership?
that is a wonderful question, there, rbt. Your bad grammar fills the board with statements that contradict. For example, if I am only going to get $0.00 out of this planned scam, why on earth would you bother trying to save me from myself? Why is it that you fail to answer the question about be a Chinaman? You seem to pee on young hui li yet defend conflict of interest fast-times board member don yang, Can this make any sense to a sane person?
/ the shares of Q-Ji are now the shares of the plaintiffs and more profanely the attorneys of the plaintiffs. And so it goes in the big city.
By the way CHNG is piped, in case you forgot.
(is somebody paying you for these lame#$%$ worthless responses you are making?)
each of the lawsuits filed named Qinan Ji as defendant, so yes, any fraudulent conveyance by Q-Ji would be covered. rbt you are exposing your underwear again. What level of grammar school did you finish by the way?
and ABAX, it appears as though they have retained their shares. Or would you like to inform the public, are they (ABAX) known like you assert honest bahama best?