how many shares? who do you think sells at $0.35 when $0.45 is on offer?
anxious to hear your response. It market place full of people who operate counter to their own interest?
and tens of thousands of shares trade at a lower price?
Why would anyone take 30% less on sale of their shares?
Could these people be related to rbt?
the real question is why someone would sell at 40 cents when they could as easily have attained 50 cents. That is a 25% difference. Are the mentally #$%$ operating in the marketplace?
well... doesn't that just tell it all. (in a bk, rbt, the management has nothing to say, the trustee owns the assets and liquidates them, eh?)
has the new yahk trustee in ch 7 liquidation departed to the Shaanxi Province to kick the tires? Is this what is taking so long? I have seen scores of "garage sales" in my neighborhood this summer. Do you think the trustee may be milking the corpus for fee income? I mean you know how these people are.
if it was "nothing" as you say, it would have been $0.00, eh? What would prompt a person motivated by self interest to take $0.29 instead of $0.49? It's not one of your cousins who is practicing this nonsense is it? Could you take a nother stab at trying to explain this rbt?
No. Can you find an instance? I speak in terms of book value which is a stated amount based cpa affirmed equity spread over the number of shares. Prior to going dark, the book value per share was greater than $10 per share. Do you disagree with that statement?
on four times average volume. Whats up? Any of you boys know what could be sparking interest of this nature? Should rbt hold, or should rbt sell? He is clueless about what is going to happen. He speaks in circles. He is as slippery as Bernie Madoff's accountant. And... his recollection is lacking. (You do not think that the $0.29 is in the nature of a devious feint, nah that is way too low class that sort of thing would just not happen amongst the boyscouts in the free market system practicing their daily market disciplines)
I have had an order in all morning to purchase 3000 shares at $0.36. Strange how this desparado would choose $0.29 instead of selling for a higher price! Could this irrational market behavior be explained by some person in forensic accounting? The staggering incompetance, corruption, and indifference to this skam are an embarrassment to the country.
"The warrants granted to the Investor on January 29, 2008 are considered derivative instruments that need to be bifurcated from the original security. If the Warrants have not been exercised within the seven year period, then the Investor can have the Company purchase the Warrants for $17,500,000. This amount is shown as a debt discount and is being amortized over the term of the Senior Notes. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company amortized $1,004,677 of the aforesaid discounts, net of capitalized of interest."
could you give me a link to some verification of this information, or are you back in the booshidder mode yet again?
CHNG Director Don(g) Yang as managing director of he Abax affiliation had every reason, in his own personal interest and that of Abax, to see CHNG default on the senior notes! A 20% annualized return on investment over a period of 6 years. A performance not even Bernie Madoff could match! And, along with the default and acceleration, he was able to accomplish a CH 7 Liquidation of the company subsidiary interests located PRC, at values approximating "salvage value" rather than going concern value. Indeed, the last we know, each of the subsidiaries is a going concern. I wonder if anyone in legal or SEC system gives an aerial copulation about the rights of the American investing public. To this point it seems sadly not, to me.