Liberals care about the environment and equality of rights between men and women. Teabaggers care only about protecting the rights of rapists. If you don't want a women to have abortions, start jailing the men who make these women pregnant, abortions will no doubt plummet to zero in no time.
Teabaggers want to shut down the government because they don't have enough votes in Congress to pass their proposed protection of rapists law.
Planned Parenthood provides valuable services for women, abortion being a very small part of the overall picture. That is why the misogynist GOP hates PP.
There will be no American jobs gained from forcing companies to stay in the US through non-economic means. Companies will site their factories or headquarters in places where they feel they can make the biggest profits. Sometimes this will be in Cuba and sometimes this will be in the US. It is the free market mechanism of allowing private businesses to make their own economic decisions to the fullest extent that creates more jobs. Being protectionist lowers the number of jobs for all.
It would be great if GM or Ford opens a manufacturing facility in Cuba. This would mean Cuba is ready for investment. GM and Ford already have plenty of manufacturing facilities everywhere else in the world, no reason not to have one also in Cuba. A Cuba facility would more likely have effect on GM and Ford operations in South American over operations in US.
Latest garbage from Teabaggers who want another fake issue to whine about, now that the fake issues of Benghazi and Obama's birth certificate did not pan out.
Hitler, Stalin, Ted Cruz, most Teabaggers. They all should have been aborted but unfortunately they were not.
The important point is that a woman has the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. It is not the concern of anyone else whether she regrets it or not afterwards. It is like saying an investor who missed a great investment opportunity should be consoled about missing out on the investment.
Lions in certain numbers are important to maintaining an ecosystem in which all all species can survive. Abortion rights is important for women to maintain their independence in society. Restrictions on abortion rights mostly end up being rules and laws to protect rapists and serially abusive male szcum bags.
Life does not begin at conception. It is extremely difficult even for a fertilized egg become an embryo. The vast majority of abortions happen naturally after the fertilized egg is rejected by the woman's body within less than a week after conception. The woman is not even aware her fertilized egg is rejected and disposed from her body. There are also plenty of cases where a fertilized egg becomes an embryo and is later rejected by the woman's body, these are call miscarriages.
Linda Tripp seems to be referring to Teabaggers, all of them power hungry monsters who would do anything to get elected. Not that there is anything wrong with that, Teabaggers will be morons.
GOP wants mass deportation without paying the cost. 11 million illegal in the US will literally take an army to round up, civil liberties will need to be curtailed to prevent people from helping illegals, businesses will need to be closely monitored to ensure they don't hire illegals, the budget for immigration control will need to skyrocket, etc. Obviously, all these GOP morons will whine about the cost every step of the way.
Yep, Israel wants a bailout and then whine about getting a bailout, just like in general all the US red states.
Your argument is rather hollow. The coal sector is part of the energy industry and an energy company needs to innovate just like every other industry or it will died. Granted energy technology and innovation is not as quick as high technology such as PCs and cellphones, it is still a relatively quickly evolving area. The world has many new energy sources available just in the last few decades. This include nuclear energy, oil and natural gas from fracking, solar and wind energy, geothermal energy, co-generation, etc. With each energy innovation, coal become a less important energy source for the US and the world.
A coal company being in the energy industry needs to transform itself into a different type of energy company or die, It is the same if a PC company continues to make PCs when sales are plummeting. The PC company will soon be out of business.
No need for Obama to support or not support any technology whether it be iPhones, Android, PCs or even coal. The market place determines which technology to support. Right now the marketplace says PCs are bad while iPhones and Android tablets are good. The marketplace also say coal is going bankrupt.
Let see, the PC industry is imploding with sales declining even faster than coal. The PC industry supports many more high paying jobs than coal. Is Obama also destroying the PC industry? Is any of the heavily PC dependent companies such as Intel, Microsoft, Adobe, Dell, Seagate, Micron, HP, etc. etc. whining like coal miners? No, they are either reinventing themselves for the next big idea or just die trying. This is call capitalism.
Advancing scientific knowledge is not going to help all the Teabag morons who adhere to the ideology of literal interpretation of the Bible. These idiots still think the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
Iran does not get $100 billion or any money just because sanctions are lifted. Iran will need to earn this money. The things that Iran needs most is technology transfers and foreign investments to develop its natural resources. Iran also needs to develop a free market so it can trade its goods and services with other countries with free markets. This means Iran will need to spend years to develop economic relationships with Western nations before it sees any sustain economic benefits. It is doubtful Iran would just suddenly in a few years abandon all hope of getting economic benefits of sanction lifting just to get nuclear weapons.
No deal with Iran would definitely not prevent Iran from getting nukes, just look as North Korea. Do idiot Teabaggers understand that? The deal with Iran could be a step toward a less dangerous Middle East. In any case, nuclear weapons are already introduced into the Middle East by Israel. There is no reason why US should risk American lives and treasure just to ensure Israel has sole monopoly to nuclear weapons in the region.