It's called the 1st Amendment. The only suit that can prevail, IMO, is one directly against a public company that deliberately disseminates false information. Your telling me that someone is going to prevail in Court against a poster who says the BV is this or that or anything else that some gullible reader is going to buy or sell stock on the basis of?
I don't want to hear Holders posting that people need to buy because the price is lower. I don't think that goes over well with those whose average price is currently $6 or more.
I wish I had a dime for every bash posting on every stock board. I wouldn't need to invest in anything. I'd be rich. So tell us who got sued for bashing?
randymmd the Clown Impersonator. You just can't keep from posting your daily sewerage. So how many days now have you told folks on this board that you sold before the dividend cut?
Why would they wait until after the Close if it were positive news on the Dividend? Think about that. And if you think the BV is still $5.43 today than I have some property to sell you in the Everglades.
So a third consecutive quarter of BV deterioration from $5.43 to $5.00 is no big deal to you? I think you need to think again about how the overall Market is going to react.
nick, I am long ARR. Basically all the reits have rallied bigtime the past 2 days with the exception of CIM and ARR. You can look for yourself. NLY, AGNC, MTGE are all up significantly the past 2 days. Apparently CIM and ARR are in the doghouse. Unfortunately the Market is totally ignoring the .07 monthly dividend and concerned about the shrinking NAV. You asked for legit comments. I think I provided one.
Is it true that ARR will be very negatively affected if the Feds accelerate the reduction in MBS purchases?
Look, smart investors are asking themselves is it worth the downside risk for 7 cents. The current SP will go lower if the BV gets cut again. And we're be told here that the dividend won't go down to .06 or .05. You bet it can.