Sun, Feb 1, 2015, 6:57 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Linn Co, LLC Message Board

lexpress56 1197 posts  |  Last Activity: Jan 29, 2015 1:46 PM Member since: May 9, 2007
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    I hope MHR doesnt need to do this

    by lexpress56 Jan 29, 2015 10:03 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Jan 29, 2015 1:46 PM Flag

    Lurking around and, unfortunately, averaging down a few times. Should be an interesting 12 months ahead of us as GE hunkers down and tries to ride out his debt and liquidity situation. I think he is wise to turn off the cash burn and focus on the Ohio joint venture. Interested to see how the pipeline situation plays out. GLTA

  • PDC announcement came out and PDC is taking an impairment charge on its acreage by Farley. I hope MHR does not have to do this also. It does not appear the write down is related to abandonment of development plans, just prices....

    Utica Non-Cash Impairment
    The Company expects in its fourth quarter 2014 financial reporting to incur a non-cash impairment of between $150 and $170 million related to its Utica shale assets in southeast Ohio. This impairment is due to low commodity prices and large natural gas differentials in Appalachian Basin and includes both PUD reclassifications to probable related to a change in the Utica development plan and a write down of a portion of its leasehold. The Company remains committed to its Utica Shale resource in the condensate and wet gas windows.

  • Reply to

    total value of assets

    by cannon32383 Jan 21, 2015 9:14 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Jan 21, 2015 11:22 AM Flag

    Good point about JV drilling -- they need it big time. Both because they have limited liquidity to drill and they have a LOT of undeveloped acreage that needs to be HBP in order to sell at a decent value.

  • Reply to

    total value of assets

    by cannon32383 Jan 21, 2015 9:14 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Jan 21, 2015 11:20 AM Flag

    I think the debt with preferred stock is a bit higher than $1b and they only have 200m shares right? I think the math probably works out around the same either way.

    At least the 8k filed yesterday indicated no changes in borrowing facilities. Much better than them being lowered at a bad time. But they really needed an increase and it does not appear they got. Will be interesting to see the PR when it comes out later today. Reserves way up but value of reserves about the same due to commodity price decreases?

  • Reply to

    Isn't the pipeline alone worth

    by henrynicholas63 Jan 13, 2015 3:41 PM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Jan 14, 2015 8:27 PM Flag

    it is the general partner of the master limited partnership and it is a MHR affiliate giving GE a miniscule (sp?) yet incredibly significant, ownership interest in the pipeline to control its development. He may have given up control over the prospective sale of the pipeline, but he has maintained the important development control. The problem is, in the big picture, GE has nothing left to leverage. He has cut his control interest to the nub.....

  • lexpress56 lexpress56 Dec 22, 2014 3:31 PM Flag

    Meant to say "need to hold acreage by production"....

  • lexpress56 lexpress56 Dec 22, 2014 3:29 PM Flag

    Ben: Don't mean to be overly critical, but your comment about hedged companies will pump as much as possible doesn't make sense if the inference is only hedged companies will do this. Hedged companies will certainly make sure they pump enough to satisfy their hedge volumes, but after that hedging is a non factor in the decision to produce so your comment seems out of place.

    That said, I agree that supply will drop after companies start pulling back capex, which will come as soon as wells already drilled or committed to are drilled. My guess is only those with bullet proof liquidity and/or a NEED to drill to hold production are the only ones that will be pumping as much as possible next year, period.

  • Reply to

    Eureka 8K

    by cuda68300 Dec 22, 2014 9:38 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Dec 22, 2014 2:45 PM Flag

    "over 50%" is what I meant to say: 48.6 + 1.56 = 50.16%

  • Reply to

    Eureka 8K

    by cuda68300 Dec 22, 2014 9:38 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Dec 22, 2014 2:44 PM Flag

    Cuda: Can you remind me what entity owns the rest of EH Holdings LLC? it appears that MS now owns slightly more of the pipeline than MHR, but there is 1.56% ownership not stated in this release, which I trust still gives GE and MHR 50% control of decision making. What MHR affiliate owns that interest, if any?
    TIA Lex

  • Reply to

    Jim Denny Spoke this morning

    by cuda68300 Dec 18, 2014 10:47 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Dec 19, 2014 3:54 PM Flag

    JMS: I hope you are right, but the Ohio regulatory rep has said there will be a "full investigation" and who knows how long that will take.

    That said, am I correct in thinking the reason they were bringing this well back on to production is they are done with the other three wells and all four will be brought on soon?

  • Reply to

    Free E & P Oil Company!

    by mikeinwestsac Nov 12, 2014 9:12 PM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Nov 13, 2014 3:04 PM Flag

    I would like to think you are right, but the estimates of Rockpile and Calber value were based on day rates and transportation charges folks were willing to pay with higher price oil. Now the demand for both service company offerings -- particularly the fourth and fifth Rockpile spreads -- has fallen and the former projected values will need to be adjusted downward (and I am afraid the adjustment might be significant). That said, TPLM has two big things going for it -- low debt and the ability to use nearly all of Rockpile and Caliber to reduce its own drilling costs. Lex

  • Reply to

    Watching MHR

    by lwbd2014 Oct 24, 2014 11:34 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Oct 26, 2014 3:19 PM Flag

    HT: what do you mean by your statement that GE just pledged 2 million of his own shares for that very purpose? What is the purpose an\d how did he pledge his shares? Thanks for explaining......

  • lexpress56 lexpress56 Oct 22, 2014 12:16 PM Flag

    Foolfinder: Is it really a stupid post when the $9 figure is thrown out there without referencing a time frame? IMO Mhr WILL be taken out for more than $9 -- and then some -- but it wont happen for another year or two because current deficit spending is too high and take outs typically don't happen for E&P companies until ebitdax nears capex. But MHRs assets are worth more than $9 and growing in value, so it will happen eventually making the prior post not so stupid as you suggest. Lex

  • Reply to

    How bout those wells?

    by gary_evans_is_here Oct 22, 2014 7:34 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Oct 22, 2014 9:04 AM Flag

    Awesome well results, particularly since all three of the Marcellus wells are 45%+ liquids, which greatly enhances associated sales revenues from the production! Plus, production on the pipeline goes up and, hopefully, EHP doesnt have issues moving the liquids because of the giant dry gas flow from the Utica well.

    Now, if we can just get some air permits and get all the high test rate wells into ongoing production mode. Very good news......

  • lexpress56 lexpress56 Oct 21, 2014 11:59 AM Flag

    I do not claim to be one who is "in the know;" however, to address your inquiry, GE's slide 56 in the October presentation puts the value between $3.195B and $3.874B. The average of those figures is just shy of $3.4B.

    On one hand, GE has historically failed to realize even his low side estimates on liquidations, so your $3b estimate may be spot on. On the other hand, the midpoint of GE's Utica acreage values is not far off from the CHK $13,000 an acre price, so maybe his low end value of about $3.2B is a fair number. Assuming the $3.2B figure to be correct, slide 56 puts the NAV per share net of debt at $9.38.

    Just a few observations based on the presentation, and here's hoping GE is right with his values and our share price gets back up above $9 in the coming year. Lex

  • Reply to

    CHK confirming value to low for MHR

    by jdberwanger Oct 16, 2014 7:20 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Oct 17, 2014 10:30 AM Flag

    JMS: Good point about adding the Bakken to my pipeline variance remark as it appears the metric comparison may well have been premised on Marcellus/Utica acreage alone. Thanks, Lex

  • Reply to

    CHK confirming value to low for MHR

    by jdberwanger Oct 16, 2014 7:20 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Oct 16, 2014 9:11 PM Flag

    How does the author of this note reconcile his numbers? If the shares have 40% upside from $4.70 at time of issue, that takes the share price to $6.40. Then in the next sentence he has a has a target price of $10. I like the $10 more, but taking his asset sale metrics at face value in light of the current PPS, the target appears 50% higher than his implied upside calculation. I trust the difference is explained by the pipeline since the implied upside is premised only on production and acreage.

  • Reply to

    Takeover talk in the oil patch is going to start

    by millstonec Oct 15, 2014 3:58 PM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Oct 16, 2014 8:58 PM Flag

    A takeover is more likely when Ebitdax gets close to equaling or exceeding capex. That is the litmus test because it is at that point that the acquirer doesnt have to issue a bunch of equity or take on debt to fund further expansion -- they just pay a fair price and take on the benefits of self-funded upside. See BEXP and KOG for examples.

  • Reply to

    IR is very excitied about the 3 S-W marcellus wells!

    by ht0629 Sep 26, 2014 10:16 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Sep 26, 2014 2:34 PM Flag

    HT: While I certainly agree with your overall sentiments, selling the Bakken is a mixed-bag from the perspective of cash flow, which MHR needs so desperately. Remember that our 5000 a day of Bakken generates a royalty-adjusted $400k or so a day in revenue, which is 100,000 mcf a day of dry Utica gas on a sustained basis, or around 60,000 mcf a day with MHRs level of liquids. Yes selling Bakken creates a large liquidity event and helps to focus the business, but revenues will fall dramatically once sold without a lot of new -- and sustained -- production. What MHR really needs is a slew of additional wells on the pipeline to jack up future EBITDA projections so they can monetize the pipeline at a high Ebitda multiple..... Now if THAT happens the shorts will really be scrambling. Just my two cents. Lex

  • Reply to

    Interesting calculations

    by redrocktom Sep 26, 2014 11:44 AM
    lexpress56 lexpress56 Sep 26, 2014 2:23 PM Flag

    times 365 ?????? Really ????

LNCO
10.33+0.23(+2.28%)Jan 30 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.