Is this Little z's environmentalist ID? Nestofweasels? I can't keep track of all of them to avoid answering.
Some states have tested your point about welfare and drug addiction only to learn the correlation is very low. You can get off of the idea that people on welfare are crack addicts breeding grounds for illegitimate children who have no idea who their fathers are. A woman only needs one baby to have and anchor baby, not a bunch of babies. Of course you don't like the constitution or is it you just think we should keep the babies and send the parents away and raise their American children in state run institutions?
The recover is faster than after the depression, the Reagan recover or the Bush recovery. It also exceeds every parameter that Mitt Romney said he would accomplish if he had been elected.
Has anyone pointed out to you that a price that is the average is not the cheapest? Have you compared the cost of one of these plans to what it would have been without Obamacare? Have you even thought about the cost in lives and quality of life for those who were before unable to get coverage at all? Your header does not match what your post says and the whole thing is meaningless without any comparison information.
Don't call little z an idiot. That is redundant.
Read the article. All Duke is saying is we are not getting the worst case scenario and that the increase is not a straight line. It agrees that global warming is occurring due to green house gases.
No one is squirming little z. There is just no reason to respond to such stupidity.
Those are republican shows along with WWF and Fox news. All the same.
Once again you thought wrong. Your notion of what liberals want or don't want is skewed by your lack of comprehension. .
States that ALEC ranked higher, based on a set of 15 “fiscal and regulatory policy variables,” actually did worse over the period of years studied, while those that ranked lower on ALEC’s scale did better. “Selling Snakeoil” looked at all 50 states, so there could be no concerns about “cherry picking.”
First they examined change in state GDP, over five years, and found almost no correlation: 0.02, which was not statistically significant. Next, they examined growth in non-farm employment, and found a somewhat stronger correlation—but in the “wrong” direction: -0.09, meaning that “the higher a state was ranked on the A-L Index in 2007 the worse its job creation record over the next five years.” Things were similar, but even worse when measuring state per capita income: The negative correlation of -.27 was statistically significant. Finally, ALEC/Laffer claimed that states following their policy prescriptions would experience more growth and higher incomes, translating into greater government revenue. But again, the correlation was negative, the opposite of what was promised: -.16.
There was actually one measure which turned out as ALEC/Laffer predicted: population growth. But that’s not a measure of economic performance!
The study then went on to test the ALEC/Laffer ranking scale against two other obvious measures of state economic well-being: the median family income and the poverty rate. They examined the results on a year-by-year basis, median income first. “The relationship is not only negative each year, it also became worse over time: the better a state did on the ALEC Outlook Ranking, the more family income declined from 2007 to 2011. The correlation, -.30, is statistically significant.” The same pattern held, but the correlation was weaker (.21), though still “marginally statistically significant.”
None needed. "
Volcanic gases undergo a tremendous increase in volume when magma rises to the Earth's surface and erupts. For example, consider what happens if one cubic meter of 900°C rhyolite magma containing five percent by weight of dissolved water were suddenly brought from depth to the surface. The one cubic meter of magma now would occupy a volume of 670 m3 as a mixture of water vapor and magma at atmospheric pressure (Sparks et. al., 1997)! The one meter cube at depth would increase to 8.75 m on each side at the surface. Such enormous expansion of volcanic gases, primarily water, is the main driving force of explosive eruptions.
The most abundant gas typically released into the atmosphere from volcanic systems is water vapor (H2O), followed by carbon dioxide (CO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2). Volcanoes also release smaller amounts of others gases, including hydrogen sulfide (H2S), hydrogen (H2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen chloride (HCL), hydrogen fluoride (HF), and helium (He).
No, little z is the expert on that issue. He has publically stated he has so many IDs yahoo can never censor him.
He's done a damn good job of cutting the nuts off of the republican congress and he has done a much better job in the middle east than Bush did at eliminating threats. What better than let them take care of each other.
Of course you do. Since the whole purpose of your post is to bash the democrat candidate why would you opine otherwise. No objective analysis is expected from you.
Do you have any idea what a drought is? Have you even looked at what has happened to the weather patterns? Do you understand how this national denial of climate change has affected the ability to deal with it? Funds are not available for proactive programs instead policies have to be symptomatic reactions to the consequences of the general affliction. You solution is to curtail agriculture? California's problem is not where the water is going but that none is coming. Global warming has so altered the jet stream pattern that it no longer flows over northern California bringing snow pack to the Sierras but goes north over the Arctic and dumps snow on the northeastern US.
Did he ever have a job? What did his education prepare him to be other than a speaker and a debater? What is a constitutional purist? Religious freedom under the constitution is no regard for any set religion in government. How does he propose to fund government? How can you be for gay rights and not allow them the same right to marry as straights have? Did he win 9 cases at the supreme court? If government hinders prosperity is he for the corporate welfare we have now? Who is paying for his campaign? Is he prepared to raise taxes to balance the budget? On who?