Worshipers, this article is not about me. It's about the Clintons. Is Ms. Dowd right or isn't she? A simple yes or no will do. I know how hard it is for you to address a post straight on but give it a try. If Ms. Dowd is wrong, please tell me in detail where she is wrong.
I know I am asking the impossible from the worshipers. They have such a hard time with reality.
I find the Clintons disgusting where as the worshipers find them, well let's say the worshipers, well, just worship them. That's why they are worshipers.
Was Dowd correct or no? Yes or no?
I see where the moron has replied to my post, not answered but replied. I have the idiot on ignore and haven't read his post but I can tell you without reading it that he has changed the subject and has not addressed the FACT that it is the coldest June on record at the Antarctic and he will never address the Fact. It is what he does. Let's see another thing the nitwit does and that is make up "facts". Maybe he'll make up a few about the coldest June on record.
Stupid is as stupid does!
Unlike you rob, I don't hate anyone.
Now how about giving the Dowd article a point by point rebuttal or do you think insults are intelligent rebuttals. Did Dowd say anything that wasn't true or that you disagree with?
What you do is intellectually dishonest so far all of the worshipers never give a direct response to a direct question and you fit right in there.
And that is relevant to Dowd's article how?
Is Dowd lying? Wait a minute. You may not recognize a lie when you see or hear one because after all you believe everything The Living God says and defend it.
So what did Dowd say that wasn't true or are do you really think an insult is real an answer?
SundayReview | Op-Ed Columnist
Isn’t It Rich?
JULY 12, 2014
Chelsea Clinton, who gave a talk at a conference in Atlanta last month, has joined the family’s lucrative speech-making business. Credit David Tulis/Associated Press
WASHINGTON — CHELSEA CLINTON never acted out during the eight years she came of age as America’s first daughter.
No ditching of her Secret Service detail. No fake IDs for underage tippling. No drug scandal. No court appearance in tank top and toe ring. Not even any dirty dancing.
Despite a tough role as the go-between in the highly public and embarrassing marital contretemps of her parents, Chelsea stayed classy.
So it’s strange to see her acting out in a sense now, joining her parents in cashing in to help feed the rapacious, gaping maw of Clinton Inc.
With her 1 percenter mother under fire for disingenuously calling herself “dead broke” when she left the White House, why would Chelsea want to open herself up to criticism that she is gobbling whopping paychecks not commensurate with her skills, experience or role in life?
As the 34-year-old tries to wean some of the cronies from the Clinton Foundation — which is, like the Clintons themselves, well-intended, wasteful and disorganized — Chelsea is making speeches that go into foundation coffers. She is commanding, as The Times’s Amy Chozick reported, up to $75,000 per appearance.
Chozick wrote: “Ms. Clinton’s speeches focus on causes like eradicating waterborne diseases. (‘I’m obsessed with diarrhea’ is a favorite line.)”
There’s something unseemly about it, making one wonder: Why on earth is she worth that much money? Why, given her dabbling in management consulting, hedge-funding and coattail-riding, is an hour of her time valued at an amount that most Americans her age don’t make in a year? (Median household income in the United States is $53,046.)
If she really wants to be altruistic, let her contribute the money to some independent charity not designed to burnish the Clinton name as her mother ramps up to return to the White House and as she herself drops a handkerchief about getting into politics.
Or let her speak for free. After all, she is in effect going to candidate school. No need to get paid for it, too.
There was disgust over Politico’s revelation that before she switched to a month-to-month contract, Chelsea was getting wildly overpaid at $600,000 annually — or over $25,000 per minute on air — for a nepotistic job as a soft-focus correspondent for NBC News.
Chelsea is still learning the answer to a question she asked when she interviewed the Geico gecko: “Is there a downside to all this fame?”
The Clintons keep acting as though all they care about is selfless public service. So why does it keep coming back to gross money grabs? It’s gone from two-for-the-price-of-one to three-for-the-price-of-20.
Hillary’s book — which feels like something she got at Ikea and had someone put together — is drooping because it was more about the estimated $13 million advance and the campaign ramp-up than the sort of intriguing self-examination and political excavations found in the memoirs of Timothy Geithner and Bob Gates. If she had had something to say, the book might have been shorter.
Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story
Continue reading the main story
Hillary doesn’t see the disconnect between expressing grave concern about mounting student loan debt while scarfing six-figure sums from at least eight colleges, and counting. She says now that she’s passing the university money to the foundation but, never Ms. Transparency, has refused to provide documentation of that. (She’s still pocketing other huge fees for speeches like her April talk in Las Vegas to the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries.)
Chozick estimated that the lucrative family speechmaking business has generated more than $100 million for the former president and first lady, whose fees range from $200,000 to $700,000 per appearance. Bill alone earned $17 million last year doing what he likes to do best — talking.
“The issue is that the philanthropic beneficiary of the speeches is a foundation, structured as a public foundation but clearly synonymous with and controlled by the Clinton family,” Rick Cohen writes in The National Philanthropy Quarterly, adding: “Donors and institutions that are paying them and their daughter huge sums for their speeches may very well be buying recognition and face time with powerful political leaders who they hope will be able to deliver political favors in the future.
“It is troubling when corporate donors give to political charities with a more or less obvious expectation that softer and gentler treatment will ensue in the future. It is also troubling when some of the payers are public or nonprofit entities themselves such as colleges and universities, converting taxpayer funds and tax-exempt donations into signals that could end up in positive treatment when these institutions are themselves seeking access and favors, even if it is only a good word put in by one of the Clintons to a federal agency providing funding or to a regulator who might be taking a critical look at university tuitions and endowment payouts.”
The Clintons were fiercely protective of Chelsea when she was a teenager, insisting on respect from the media and getting it. They need to protect their daughter again, this time from their wanton acquisitiveness.
Not one global warming hoaxer's prediction has come true yet the worshipers still cling to the lie. It doesn't surprise me. They believe The Living God.
Facts really do make their heads hurt.
Now this is a fact:
Coldest Antarctic June Ever Recorded
Posted on July 12, 2014 by Anthony Watts
Story submitted by Eric Worrall
Antarctica continues to defy the global warming script, with a report from Meteo France, that June this year was the coldest Antarctic June ever recorded, at the French Antarctic Dumont d’Urville Station.
According to the press release, during June this year, the average temperature was -22.4c (-8.3F), 6.6c (11.9F) lower than normal. This is the coldest June ever recorded at the station, and almost the coldest monthly average ever – only September 1953 was colder, with a recorded average temperature of -23.5c (-10.3F).
June this year also broke the June daily minimum temperature record, with a new record low of -34.9c (-30.8F).
Other unusual features of the June temperature record are an unusual excess of sunlight hours (11.8 hours rather than the normal 7.4 hours), and unusually light wind conditions.
Dumont d’Urville Station has experienced ongoing activity since 1956. According to the Meteo France record, there is no other weather station for 1000km in any direction.
I think you could have changed GOP to Democrat/Socialist and your little inaccurate rant would describe you.
I am not a Republican. I never have been and you would be surprised at what I believe so you really don't know me at all and you will never give me an honest debate on the facts. You will do what all of the worshipers do, change the subject and insult because you cannot defend you far left beliefs.
That was an intelligent well thought out post. Instead of an insult how about a point by point rebuttal? Never happen!
I give actual example that global warming is a hoax like growing polar ice caps and milder hurricane seasons, real examples. The Worshipers give articles based on doctored computer projections that have never come true.
This is a real happening not a false prediction:
Brisbane hits coldest temperature in 103 years
Chris McMahon, Sharnee Rawson |
The Courier-Mail |
July 12, 2014 10:59AM
If you are lucky enough to be reading this from the comfort of your blankets, it might be best to stay there, as Brisbane has hit its coldest temperatures in 103 years.
Not since July 28 1911 has Brisbane felt this cold, getting down to a brisk 2.6C at 6.41am.
At 7am, it inched up to 3.3C.
Matt Bass, meteorologist from BOM, said the region was well below our average temperatures.
“If it felt cold, that’s because it was, breaking that record is pretty phenomenal for Brisbane,” Bass said.
“The average for this time of year is 12C, so Brisbane was about 9C below average, it is pretty impressive really, to have the coldest morning in 103 years is a big record.”
The coldest place across the state was Oakey which got down to -6.1C, which was the coldest temperature for the town since 2011.
stop calling the loons, loons for a more accurate term, The Worshipers. I realize loons really does describe them because it is impossible for them to grasp reality. Reality really disturbs them and makes them uncomfortable so they deny it. IOW they are loons.
However after observing them for years I have come to recognize that even though they know The Living God is a liar they still believe everything he says and as Worshipers they are bound to blindly justify his lies. It's a matter of religion and we all know that religion is based on faith not logic. Because they cannot accept reality, they cannot admit he is a liar and he is completely untrustworthy so just like the hard the core religious right they deny reality and will defend complete fantasy with religious fervor.
I believe The Worshipers is a valid description.
Not one worshiper has addressed the woman's question. Typical!
I see where only two worshipers have responded and neither one of them has a clue.
Black American from Gang-Besieged Baltimore: 'Where Can I Get Asylum?'
by Tony Lee 11 Jul 2014, 1:13 PM PDT
As the White House plans to spend billions of taxpayer funds to take care of illegal immigrant children who are unlawfully entering the country, some black Americans who live in some of the most dangerous neighborhoods are wondering where they and their children can get refugee status and aid.
On Friday's Laura Ingraham Show, Elaine, a black woman from Baltimore, expressed her outrage that President Barack Obama is putting the interests of illegal immigrant children above those of American citizens. Though the number of illegal immigrant children unlawfully entering the country has spiked since Obama unilaterally enacted his temporary amnesty program in 2012, the White House has said the primary cause of the border crisis is the rampant gang violence in Central America.
"I'm living a nightmare. My whole neighborhood is so violent. There's so much crime," she said. "I have gangs everywhere here in Baltimore! I can't let my daughter ride her bicycle outside – I can't do anything, Laura! I'm trapped here."
Elaine told Ingraham that she listens to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Obama and feels that "nobody is saying a word" while spending billions of dollars taking care of foreigners who are unlawfully in the country.
"Well, what about my neighborhood? You don't have to do it in Beverly Hills, but in the inner cities where we are suffering," she said. "My children cannot play outside. I cannot take my trash out without locking the door – it's awful. Who is going to give us anything? Where can I get asylum? Where can I get refugee status? I don't know what I can do. Nobody cares what happens to my children."
The unemployment rate for black Americans is nearly double that of whites, and the amnesty legislation favored by Obama and the bipartisan permanent political class would hurt black Americans the most by flooding the labor market with more cheap labor. That is why Civil Rights Commissioner Peter Kirsanow wrote the Congressional Black Caucus to urge them to vote against amnesty bills that would make it more difficult for black Americans to enter the middle class.
"Giving amnesty to illegal immigrants would only exacerbate this problem facing low-skilled men, who are disproportionately African-American," Kirsanow concluded.
I should have said the idiot and his brother flop. Neither one responded to the subject of the post. Typical!
Not one loon except the idiot responded to this post. I think it is because I am right and they know it.