Wed, Jul 23, 2014, 11:15 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

Advanced Cell Technology Inc. Message Board

lonesome_polecatt 399 posts  |  Last Activity: 2 hours 3 minutes ago Member since: Apr 8, 2013
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 9, 2014 12:12 PM Flag

    So I'm lying about the polar caps not melting and the hurricane season being mild? Aren't the real liars the loons that predicted the caps are melting and the season would be violent? And how about NASA and NOAA fudging the figures? Weren't they lying?

  • Here's the bottom line. None of the sky is falling predictions the global warming kooks have made have come true. The polar caps aren't melting. The hurricane season haven't been catastrophic. Not all glaciers are melting and according to NOAA the Earth hasn't warmed in the last ten years. In fact it has been cooling.

    This should tell you something but it doesn't. The facts should speak louder than your bogus studies. And yes NASA has been faking the figures. Just do a search on "NASA Global Warming Hoax"

    Now as far as the 97% lie:

    "Climate Scam – 97% Of Climate Scientists Are In Consensus, Is A Lie

    Sep 12

    Posted by Tory Aardvark

    77 earth scientists out of 10,257 earth scientists invited replied, so how do they get 97% consensus

    The next UN Climate Religion Synod (COP17) in Durban is just 10 weeks away, and despite almost universal consensus that Climate Change talks will slide off the precipice and into oblivion, the drones of the Church of Climatology are still pumping out the sound bytes that are only believed by Climate Activists and those with power and money to gain.

    Typical of the Climate Religion drones are the journalists propagandists at the Guardian who are claiming that most of the world is irrational, a lacklustre effort to spin the massive decline in belief in Climate Religion and many more stories of approaching climate Armageddon.

    Underpining all of these fairy tales is the dead horse of More than 97% of active climate scientists are in consensus:

    The small number of climate scientists actually supporting the Al Gore/IPCC claims of catastrophic global warming and the actual AGW “predictions” has always been a major embarrassment. As a result, the left/liberal/greens have been forced to fabricate bogus support that can’t stand up to any form of scrutiny.

    First, it was the claim that 2,500 IPCC-related scientists agreed with the 2007 IPCC report. Soon afer it was discovered that the actual number of scientists who actually agreed with the report contents was only 25.

    Next, when the 2,500 shrunk to 25, a couple of University of Illinois researchers conjured up a 2-minute online, anonymous survey that they hoped would deliver some big numbers to crow about. They solicited 10,257 earth scientists and only 77 chose to answer the online survey (yes, only 77). 75 of those “climate scientists” agreed with the survey’s two questions (yes, only 2 questions).

    Voila, the infamous and widely publicized “97%” of climate scientists (75 divided by 77) who thought man was the cause of global warming turned out to be a numeric joke.

    As a side note, in order to assure an initial high survey percentage, the two researchers did not ask major segments of the scientific world to participate. Those would be the segments that were known to be critical of the AGW theory, including: solar scientists, space scientists, cosmologists, physicists, meteorologists and astronomers."

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 9, 2014 11:35 AM Flag

    jr, thank you for the point by point rebuttal. Oh, wait a minute you didn't give me a point by point rebut because you can't refute the article so you will believe the global warming hoax no matter how they cook the "science".

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 9, 2014 12:06 AM Flag

    Poor reading comprehension, rob? I just printed what you loony left pals said.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 8, 2014 10:57 PM Flag

    And these are leftists asking this.

  • Pro-Amnesty Protest: Would Obama Send His Kids 'Back to Kenya'?
    by Joel B. Pollak 8 Jul 2014, 1:07 PM PDT 796 post a comment

    PORT HUENEME -- Over 100 pro-amnesty activists from Southern California traveled to Naval Base Ventura County on Tuesday to stage a demonstration outside the gates to demand "humane treatment" for illegal aliens who have been transferred there from Texas by U.S. Border Patrol. The aliens, many of them unaccompanied children, are from Central America and crossed the U.S.-Mexico border as part of a massive recent migration.

    The demonstrators represented a variety of backgrounds, from church and student organizations to left-wing political groups. They chanted, "No papers? No fear! Our children stay here!" and "All children matter! Let our kids stay!" Karen Gonzales, a senior at California State University Northridge, told Breitbart News: "As humans, none of us is illegal. The kids came here because their parents are already here, and to get away from violence."

    Oxnard native Robert Cruz, 57, who served as a U.S. Navy corpsman and U.S. Army medic, carried an American flag and told Breitbart News that he was at the protest to show "we're a lot different than Murrieta." He added: "I understand that many would love to come here legally, but they are running away from violence. They don't have a say. This country was built by immigrants. Should we close our door? We stand for equality for all."

    Asked what he thought of President Barack Obama's promise to deport children arriving illegally, Cruz said: "I think he should search deep inside his heart, and look at what he's saying and what he's doing. He'd be sending them back, possibly, to a death sentence.

    "Would President Obama do that to his own children? Would he do that to his father's family from Africa? Would he send his nieces and nephews back to Kenya?"

  • Reply to

    Princess Nancy's Opportunity.....

    by fraud_z_buster Jul 8, 2014 8:57 PM
    lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 8, 2014 10:48 PM Flag

    The Living God told us the border was secure and we all know he wouldn't lie.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 8, 2014 7:46 PM Flag

    It doesn't surprise me that the loons would believe the global warming lies. They believe everything The Living God says.

  • Fake Sea Level Rise Approved by NASA in Climate Fraud

    By John O’Sullivan

    NASA researchers admit adding fake inches to sea level rises. Skeptics denounce desperate attempt to salvage government global warming policies.

    In a disturbing development in the ongoing global warming fiasco the U.S. government-funded Sea Level Research Group has been given a green light from NASA to exaggerate sea level rises way above actual recorded measurements. The reason? So that policy makers can falsely blame humans for adding to natural rises in sea levels.

    Land Mass Rise Used as Excuse to Fiddle Data

    The NASA-funded Sea Level Research Group is based at the University of Colorado. It made the announcement last week that it will begin adding a nonexistent 0.3 millimeters per year to its Global Mean Sea Level Time Series.

    Reporting in Forbes Magazine on this farce is James M. Taylor, senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute. Taylor pinpoints that NASA’s reason for this latest trick is to “compensate” for rising land mass.

    Most folk have now cottoned onto the shenanigans of government paid climatologists since Climategate. In 2009 a clique of secretive scientists were caught fudging world temperatures to make it appear the earth was warming unnaturally when it wasn’t.

    But with interest in global warming now bottoming to a 20-year low desperate new measures are being dreamt up to scare voters into accepting more tax rises to stem non-existent ‘human caused climate change.’

    Now government ‘experts’ claim they need to add the bogus extra 0.3 millimeters each year onto satellite measurements of our ocean levels, which will conjure up an 1.2 inches over the course of the 21st century, to ‘compensate’ for the rise in land which has been occurring without any human interference since the end of the last ice age 11,000 years ago.

    Last Ice Age Melting Still Changing Our Planet

    Back then Manhattan and most of England was buried under one mile of ice that compressed the ground like squeezing water from a sponge. Over time the land has slowly been springing back up as the weight of billions of tons of ice has melted.

    Taylor points out that this steady pace of an 8-inch rise in sea levels for the last century is very much in line with previous rates of sea level rise during our current Holocene interglacial period.

    But Taylor, managing editor of Environment & Climate News adds, “with an artificially enhanced 9.2 inches of sea level rise, alarmists can claim sea level is rising 31 percent faster than it did last century.”

    He notes, “While this is not monumental in and of itself, it will allow alarmists to paint a dramatically different picture of sea level rise than is occurring in the real world.”

    Skeptics are accusing NASA of needless fiddling to bail out the discredited United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which had hyped computer model guesstimates that we’d see 15 inches of sea level rise during the 21st century, which is double the rate recorded over the past century.

    Even Al Gore No Longer Believes Sea Level Spin

    However, rises in global temperatures have also stopped since the start of the 21st century and global cooling appears to have set in; according to independent researchers we may be on the cusp of a new ice age. Another clue that the global warming cult is on it’s last legs comes from former U.S. President, Al Gore, who first whipped up the frenzy about catastrophic sea level rises in his film, ‘An Inconvenient Truth;’ Gore is now the proud owner of a $9 million oceanfront villa in Montecito, California.

    As the old saying goes, ‘follow the money’ and with so little real world data to back up increasingly discredited climate alarmism public interest in the global warming doomsaying continues to fall off a cliff.

  • Reply to

    Planned Destabilization by Odumbo

    by sosuaman Jul 8, 2014 1:41 PM
    lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 8, 2014 5:24 PM Flag

    rob, you're an ignoramus. Gerrymandering has been going on since 1812. Both parties do it. Yes even the blue socialist states Gerrymander but I don't hear you complain when the socialists use it to elect socialist candidates.

    I guess in your uneducated mind the world is black and white, no gray.

  • Business Insider

    Female White House Staffers Got Smaller Raises Than Men

    Hunter Walker

    Salary data released last week revealed average male staffers at the White House earn about 13% more than their female counterparts. The White House responded by pointing out six female staffers received high profile promotions in the past year. However, according to data collected by the conservative consulting firm Target Point, the women who were promoted at the White House received smaller raises than men.

    While the average man promoted at the White House received a 24.4% raise, Target Point found the average raise for a promoted woman was 18.5%. Target Point also found 46 men were promoted at the White House between 2013 and 2014 compared to 41 women. Additionally, the firm noted 88 women left White House jobs in the past year while only 77 men departed.

    Target Point Senior Vice President and Chief Data Scientist Alex Lundry said this data shows "the White House's hypocrisy on this issue is stunning" as President Barack Obama has made equal pay for women a major part of his agenda this year.

    "The data clearly reveal that its not just salary for which there are significant differences between men and women, but also raises, promotions, and turnover," said Lundry. "Empirically, this White House does not treat their male and female employees the same."

    On July 2, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest addressed the fact there is a pay disparity between male and female staffers at the same time the president is attempting to address this same issue nationally.

    "I wouldn’t hold up the White House as the perfect example here," Earnest said at his daily briefing.

    Earnest went on to say "we still have more work to do at the White House," though he claimed "the White House performs significantly better than the private sector" in this regard. He did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider Tuesday about the statistics on staffer raises.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 8, 2014 3:20 PM Flag

    Here's the bottom line. None of the sky is falling predictions the global warming kooks have made have come true. The polar caps aren't melting. The hurricane season haven't been catastrophic. Not all glaciers are melting and according to NOAA the Earth hasn't warmed in the last ten years. In fact it has been cooling.

    This should tell you something but it doesn't. The facts should speak louder than your bogus studies. And yes NASA has been faking the figures. Just do a search on "NASA Global Warming Hoax"

    Now as far as the 97% lie:

    "Climate Scam – 97% Of Climate Scientists Are In Consensus, Is A Lie

    Sep 12

    Posted by Tory Aardvark

    77 earth scientists out of 10,257 earth scientists invited replied, so how do they get 97% consensus

    The next UN Climate Religion Synod (COP17) in Durban is just 10 weeks away, and despite almost universal consensus that Climate Change talks will slide off the precipice and into oblivion, the drones of the Church of Climatology are still pumping out the sound bytes that are only believed by Climate Activists and those with power and money to gain.

    Typical of the Climate Religion drones are the journalists propagandists at the Guardian who are claiming that most of the world is irrational, a lacklustre effort to spin the massive decline in belief in Climate Religion and many more stories of approaching climate Armageddon.

    Underpining all of these fairy tales is the dead horse of More than 97% of active climate scientists are in consensus:

    The small number of climate scientists actually supporting the Al Gore/IPCC claims of catastrophic global warming and the actual AGW “predictions” has always been a major embarrassment. As a result, the left/liberal/greens have been forced to fabricate bogus support that can’t stand up to any form of scrutiny.

    First, it was the claim that 2,500 IPCC-related scientists agreed with the 2007 IPCC report. Soon afer it was discovered that the actual number of scientists who actually agreed with the report contents was only 25.

    Next, when the 2,500 shrunk to 25, a couple of University of Illinois researchers conjured up a 2-minute online, anonymous survey that they hoped would deliver some big numbers to crow about. They solicited 10,257 earth scientists and only 77 chose to answer the online survey (yes, only 77). 75 of those “climate scientists” agreed with the survey’s two questions (yes, only 2 questions).

    Voila, the infamous and widely publicized “97%” of climate scientists (75 divided by 77) who thought man was the cause of global warming turned out to be a numeric joke.

    As a side note, in order to assure an initial high survey percentage, the two researchers did not ask major segments of the scientific world to participate. Those would be the segments that were known to be critical of the AGW theory, including: solar scientists, space scientists, cosmologists, physicists, meteorologists and astronomers."

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 7, 2014 11:48 PM Flag

    Flop, knowing how you make "facts" up and fail to document anything you say, why should I answer your fictions? The chief executive is The Living God. He tells the pentagon what to say and what to think so why should I trust anything this lying admin says? You believe everything The Living God says but I don't.

    Is NOAA lying about the climate cooling and the polar ice growing? Yes or no!

    Oh BTW the glaciers in Ice Land are growing.

    Do a search on:

    12 more glaciers that haven’t heard the news about global warming

    by editor on January 25, 2010

    The glaciers are melting! The glaciers are melting! The glaciers are…uhhhhh…never mind.

    Turns out the IPCC’s chicken little story that all the Himalayan glaciers are melting is just another exaggeration. Or fraud. Take your choice. You know, like the stats coming out of East Anglia CRU. And its claim that Antarctica is melting. And that Greenland’s ice cap is melting. And that sea levels are rising. And that the polar bears are dying. Fact is, some glaciers are retreating, but many others around the world are growing.

    “But how is that possible? How can glaciers be growing when the world is warming up like a package of Jiffy-Pop in a microwave?”

    Here are a dozen glaciers (or groups of glaciers) around the world that are growing almost as quickly as global warming skepticism.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 7, 2014 10:04 PM Flag

    The arguments of the loons are sciolistic to say the least..

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 7, 2014 10:02 PM Flag

    Well, he showed a birth certificate.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 7, 2014 8:17 PM Flag

    NOAA says we are cooling not warming so how are we moving to temperature extremes? Do a little research and you will find the hottest century in the last 1000 years was the 11th century and guess what? It meant a longer growing season and Europe thrived. The Scots had vineyards and made wine. The Vikings settled Greenland because it was warm enough to grow crops.

    So tell me where are the temperature extremes? All of the nutty predictions from the global warming "scientists" have not come true. In fact the opposite of their lies has happened.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 7, 2014 4:35 PM Flag

    So rob, changing the subject. Is NOAA right? Yes or no!

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 7, 2014 2:25 PM Flag

    Thank you for your rational well thought out response. All of that anger. Maybe you should seek help before it is too late.

    I have always said that loons are unhappy, angry and dysfunctional. You certainly prove me right.

    I bear no ill will. Too bad you can't say the same about me.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 7, 2014 1:00 PM Flag

    We could stop polluting tomorrow and go back to the horse and buggy but that won't stop the world's worse polluters from polluting. Four of the top five polluters are China #1, India #3, Russia #4 and Japan #5. The US is number two and falling.

    If we impose draconian measures on the US all it will do is drop productivity and raise costs on our products where as the rest of the world will do nothing and out produce us.

    There are no simple solutions to complex problems. Only politicians and fools (but I repeat myself) offer simple solutions to complex problems.

    Do I want a cleaner environment, yes. Do I believe in global warming, no.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jul 7, 2014 11:48 AM Flag

    Thanks for your response. I believe global warming is a hoax. You believe Al Gore, the PT Barnum of the left.

ACTC
0.0802-0.0058(-6.74%)Jul 23 3:59 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Facebook, Inc.
NasdaqGSWed, Jul 23, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
Xilinx Inc.
NasdaqGSWed, Jul 23, 2014 4:00 PM EDT