% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.


lonesome_polecatt 412 posts  |  Last Activity: 10 hours ago Member since: Apr 8, 2013
  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 10:06 PM Flag

    flop, you will repeat a lie in hot minute but you will ignore real science. Unlike you I don't pull "facts" out of my ssa but you do. I gave you the Harvard study that proved that the hottest century in the last 1000 years was the 10th century not this or the last century but the 10th century and you ignore it. What does that say about you and your GW hoax?

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 10:00 PM Flag

    We have known for years that you are a hypocrite. You worship Socialist 1%ers Pocahontas , TWBotW and yes, according to CNN Money Bernie Sanders. Both Hussein and TWBotW took huge amounts from Wall street but you never mention that.

    To you there are no corrupt Socialist but all conservatives are evil.

    What a knee pad hypocrite you are.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 7:39 PM Flag

    Oh, gosh, what a surprise, you changed the subject and insulted.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 7:36 PM Flag

    You do love a lie, don't you? In facts that is where you get you "facts". Right out of your ssa.
    Monday, 24 August 2015
    July “Warmest on Record” Lie Debunked by NASA Data
    Written by Alex Newman
    July “Warmest on Record” Lie Debunked by NASA Data

    The Obama administration's politicized bureaucracies are trying to deceive the world once again, this time claiming, falsely, that July of 2015 was the “warmest on record.” In the real world, it was not even the hottest July since last year, according to the global satellite temperature record, which is considered more reliable and comprehensive than the admittedly manipulated and incomplete data relied upon by NASA and NOAA to make their latest false “warmest on record” pronouncements. Virtually none of the establishment press bothered to mention the caveats on the methodology behind taking the Earth's temperature, preferring instead to parrot official press releases yet again.
    Indeed, as has happened in virtually every instance where the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) made a “warmest on record” claim — whether it be over a time span of a year or a month — the agencies' own data contradict the claim. In fact, the global temperature data gathered by NASA's own satellites, the Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) data set, along with the satellite data from the University of Alabama at Huntsville (UAH), make a complete mockery of the latest fear-mongering, just as they did for claims made about last August and the year 2014.

    “Better data shows July this year is the hottest since way back in … 2014. It’s not 4,000 years, not 135 years, it’s the hottest July since the last one,” noted popular Australian climate researcher and scientist Jo Nova in an analysis ridiculing the official claims and the even more outlandish media propaganda surrounding them. “We only have 30 years of good climate data: the satellites tell us the pause is real, and last month’s summer temperatures is not a record anything. According to the UAH and RSS global satellites, lower troposphere averages for July 2014 were 0.30C and 0.34C, compared to July 2015 of 0.28C. Even June 2015 was hotter (UAH, 0.35C; RSS, 0.39C). July 2015 is not even the hottest month since June.”

    Oops! As usual, the cascade of alarmist headlines worldwide about the allegedly record-setting July — some especially silly journalists speculated that it may have been the hottest in 4,000 years — began with a press releases from alleged scientists at the NOAA and NASA. Instead of focusing on the fact that their own satellites show that the ongoing pause in global warming has been going for more than two decades, or that even this June and last July were warmer than July 2015, the tax-funded alarmists cherry-picked dubious, incomplete, massaged, and in some cases invented (extrapolated) data to falsely claim a new “record” was set last month.

    “The July average temperature across global land and ocean surfaces was 1.46°F (0.81°C) above the 20th century average,” NOAA said in its deceptive press release. “As July is climatologically the warmest month for the year, this was also the all-time highest monthly temperature in the 1880–2015 record, at 61.86°F (16.61°C), surpassing the previous record set in 1998 by 0.14°F (0.08°C).” It also claimed that land surface temperatures in July were the sixth highest on record, and that much of the alleged record was driven by warmth in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. NOAA's "Global Summary Information" press release did not bother to mention the powerful but natural El Niño driving ocean temperatures.

    Critics tore the claims apart from all angles. Using a number of fascinating graphs and images created with the U.S. government's own temperature data, independent climate analyst Steven Goddard at Real Climate Science demolished the official claims and lambasted the “criminals” behind them. “July was either 8th or 9th warmest since 1979, not the 'hottest month ever' as the criminals at NOAA claim,” he observed. “Global warming theory demands that the lower troposphere warms faster than the surface — the exact opposite of the fraudulent claims being made by NOAA. The level of fraud on display here is off scale. July was nowhere near the hottest month.”

    Among other data cited by Goddard is the fact that the percentage of days over 100 degrees in the United States has plummeted since the 1930s. Again using the U.S. government's own data, he showed that the average summer maximum temperature “has also plummeted, with summer 2015 more than four degrees cooler than 1936.” Across the United States, July was just the 51st hottest since 1895, according to U.S. government temperature data — despite major fact errors by journalists, such as Mariano Castillo and Brandon Miller at alarmist media outlets such as CNN, who falsely claimed July was the warmest on record in the United States.

    “Make no mistake about it,” continued Goddard, a whistleblower who worked on U.S. government contracts to create climate models and now operates websites debunking global-warming alarmism and the false claims underpinning it. “The people making these claims are criminals, who are generating completely fake numbers for the White House — in true Orwellian fashion.” The graphs he provides comparing the real data gathered by the U.S. government and the false claims made in press releases make that abundantly clear.

    Other critics ridiculed the claims based on the dubious data sets used by bureaucrats to make the alarmist pronouncements in the first place. Writing in the Washington Times, International Climate Science Coalition Executive Director Tom Harris said the Obama administration was “hyping meaningless records in a parameter that does not exist in order to frighten us about something that doesn’t matter.” He pointed out that NOAA's “record” claim was based on “calculations” that showed July 2015 to be eight one-hundredths of a degree Celsius above July 1998, while NASA calculated that this year's July was a mere two one-hundredths of a degree warmer than July of 2011.

    “But government spokespeople rarely mention the inconvenient fact that these records are being set by less than the uncertainty in the statistics,” explained Harris. “NOAA claims an uncertainty of 14 one-hundredths of a degree in its temperature averages, or near twice the amount by which they say the record was set. NASA says that their data is typically accurate to one tenth of a degree, five times the amount by which their new record was set. So, the new temperature records are meaningless. Neither agency knows whether a record was set.”

    In other words, even ignoring their own satellite data and relying on the data sets (and adjustments) used by NOAA and NASA, the “warmest on record” claim is absurd based on the agencies' own acknowledged margins of error. “Such misrepresentations are now commonplace in NOAA and NASA announcements,” Harris continued, adding that it was “irrational” to even try to calculate “global average temperatures” to hundredths of a degree, considering the fact that there is very little to no real data for the vast majority of the Earth's surface. “They are regularly proclaiming monthly and yearly records set by less than the uncertainties in the measurements. Scientists within the agencies know that this is dishonest.”

    Of course it is dishonest. And extremely misleading. In fact, the entire “climate” juggernaut is based on dishonesty and fraud, as countless scientists — including more than a few who have resigned from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC) in disgust — have made abundantly clear. The “ClimateGate” scandals, in which alarmist “scientists” were exposed conspiring to break the law and deceive humanity, offered even more proof. Then there is the fact that there has been no warming in 20 years, contrary to every prediction based on UN climate models. More than a few credible experts, including many who have worked for NOAA, NASA, and the UN, are now warning that a natural cycle of global cooling is the real threat — and that it is coming soon.

    But with the UN and its revenue-hungry member governments and dictatorships meeting later this year in Paris to hammer out a planetary global-warming regime to battle the essential-to-life gas CO2, humanity can expect an accelerating deluge of easily disproved climate claims from governments and media outlets in the coming months — along with demands for more cash and more government. The “Paris-ites,” as critics are calling them, have invested so much taxpayer money and put so much of their credibility on the line that the man-made catastrophic-warming charade must be perpetuated at all costs. On the bright side, though, it appears that much of humanity, and Americans in particular, are seeing through it all.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 7:31 PM Flag

    NASA Facing The Heat For Hottest Year Lie
    Monday, January 19, 2015 12:11

    With great fanfare NASA announced that 2014 was the hottest year on record. The part of the story they didn’t mention is they are only 38% sure it was the hottest on record. The other thing they didn’t mention is that surface temperatures were used rather than satellite data and part of their data used estimated temperatures.

    Per the UK Daily Mail, “the claim made headlines around the world, but yesterday it emerged that GISS’s [NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies] analysis – based on readings from more than 3,000 measuring stations worldwide – is subject to a margin of error. NASA admits this means it is far from certain that 2014 set a record at all.

    Yet the Nasa press release failed to mention this, as well as the fact that the alleged ‘record’ amounted to an increase over 2010, the previous ‘warmest year’, of just two-hundredths of a degree – or 0.02C. The margin of error is said by scientists to be approximately 0.1C – several times as much.

    As a result, GISS’s director Gavin Schmidt has now admitted NASA thinks the likelihood that 2014 was the warmest year since 1880 is just 38 per cent. However, when asked by this newspaper whether he regretted that the news release did not mention this, he did not respond.

    To put it another way, it was almost 2x as likely that 2014 was not the warmest year since 1880 a fact that Mr. Schmidt did not want the public to know.

    We all know you can't trust NASA but you do flop even though they have lied in the past.

  • UnitedHealth says Obamacare is costing it billions

    UnitedHealth Group warned nearly two months ago that new customers from the Affordable Care Act exchanges would hurt the insurer’s bottom line, but it looks like it misestimated by how much as enrollments exceeded expectations.

    UnitedHealth, the U.S.’s largest insurer, says it will incur as much as $100 million more in losses associated with 2016 ACA plans than previously forecast. That brings total ACA plan loss projections for its new fiscal year to more than $500 million, up from previous estimates of $400 million to $425 million.

    “By mid-2016 we will determine to what extent, if any, we will continue to offer products in the exchange market in 2017,” said Dave Wichmann, president and CFO of UnitedHealth.

    UnitedHealth reported losses of $720 million last year related to exchange enrollees, including $245 million for advance recognition of 2016 losses that aren’t included in the total estimated losses for this year. That means that UnitedHealth is expected to lose up to $745 million due to its 2016 ACA enrollees.

  • lonesome_polecatt by lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 5:23 PM Flag

    Your SS Card - did you know?
    History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
    Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this.
    It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends.
    They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican.
    Facts are Facts.
    Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
    Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it any way and the message,
    NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed. Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
    1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,
    No longer Voluntary
    2.) That the participants would only have to pay1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

    Now 7.65% matched by your employer on the first $90,000

    3.) That the money the participants elected to putinto the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
    No longer tax deductible
    4.) That the money the participants put into the independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore,
    Would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and,
    Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and Spent
    5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
    Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed

    Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month
    and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away'

    ------------ --------- --------- ---------
    --------- --------- ----
    Q: Which Political Party took Social Security

  • lonesome_polecatt by lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 4:41 PM Flag

    Johnny was having trouble in school. His teacher was always yelling at him, "You're driving me crazy, Johnny, can’t you learn anything?

    One day Johnny's mother came to school to check on how he was doing. The teacher told her honestly, that her son was simply a disaster, getting very low marks, and that she had never seen such a stupid boy in her entire teaching career. The mom was so shocked at the feedback that she withdrew her son from school and moved out of Detroit, relocating to Cleveland .

    Twenty five years later, the teacher was diagnosed with an almost incurable cardiac disease.

    All the doctors strongly advised her to have open heart surgery, which only one surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic could perform. Left with no other options, the teacher decided to have the operation, which was remarkably successful.

    When she opened her eyes after the surgery she saw a handsome young doctor smiling down at her. She wanted to thank him, but could not talk. Her face started to turn blue, she raised her hand, trying to tell him something, but quickly died.

    The doctor was shocked, wondering what went wrong so suddenly. Then he turned around and saw our friend Johnny, a janitor in the Clinic, who had unplugged the life-support equipment in order to connect his vacuum cleaner.

    If you thought Johnny had become a heart-surgeon, there is a high likelihood that you will vote for Hillary.

  • lonesome_polecatt by lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 4:37 PM Flag

    In 2016, both Groundhog Day and the State of the Union address to Congress will occur on the same day.
    This is an ironic juxtaposition of events.

    One involves a meaningless ritual in which we look to an insignificant creature of little intelligence for prognostication.

    The other involves a groundhog.

  • Give Chicago to Canada.

  • Democrats/Socialists are that kind of special stupid.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 3:54 PM Flag

    Here is a real fact you never addressed:

    Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Who Endorsed Obama Now Says Prez. is ‘Ridiculous’ & ‘Dead Wrong’ on ‘Global Warming’

    Nobel Prize Winning Physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever: 'Global warming is a non-problem'

    'I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you're wrong. Dead wrong.'

    'Global warming really has become a new religion.'

    "I am worried very much about the [UN] conference in Paris in November...I think that the people who are alarmist are in a very strong position.'

    'We have to stop wasting huge, I mean huge amounts of money on global warming.'

    By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotJuly 6, 2015 8:34 PM with 918 comments

    Climate Depot Exclusive

    Dr. Ivar Giaever, a Nobel Prize-Winner for physics in 1973, declared his dissent on man-made global warming claims at a Nobel forum on July 1, 2015.

    “I would say that basically global warming is a non-problem,” Dr. Giaever announced during his speech titled “Global Warming Revisited.”

    Your non-answer to this was to do what you always do, insult me.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 2:00 PM Flag

    You are one to talk about "facts". You pull "facts" out of your ssa, like the Antarctic cap is melting.

    You won't address real facts about GW but you will change the subject and insult. You really are a lemming.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 20, 2016 12:30 PM Flag

    black, maine lives in a bathhouse in San Francisco with his pet goat Phil. They are very close.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 19, 2016 9:30 PM Flag

    And you flop are a PT Barnum lemming.

  • Reply to


    by dickw3939 Jan 19, 2016 12:41 PM
    lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 19, 2016 9:28 PM Flag

    richard, the GOP has betrayed us.

  • Reply to


    by dickw3939 Jan 19, 2016 12:41 PM
    lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 19, 2016 4:14 PM Flag

    richard, socialists are vicious ignoramuses who only get their news and "facts" from their socialist masters and will regurgitate any lie their loony masters put out.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 7, 2016 11:27 PM Flag

    flop, most of these orphans and widows are Sunnis which Saudi Arabia is so why doesn't the Saudis invite them in?

    To say the Sunnis and the Shias don't like each other is an understatement. They hate each other.

    I agree with you let them kill each other off but we shouldn't be inviting them here to the US.

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 7, 2016 9:58 PM Flag

    More importantly, how come the super rich gulf states are not inviting these widows and orphans into their country and giving their fellow Arabs/Muslims refuge?

  • lonesome_polecatt lonesome_polecatt Jan 7, 2016 4:44 PM Flag

    fraud, flop never give a direct answer to a direct question.