The only histrionics in this string are yours. I see a lot of data, which I researched and verifies, here contradicting your assertions. Where is your evidence to the contrary?
Apparently rah-rah you missed the bombing of the Embassy in Beirut that killed 14 Americans that occurred Reagan (not to mention the 241 Marines killed in the bombing of their barracks in Beirut). Or the 12 Embassy bombings during the Bush Administration. You are deaf, dumb and blind to the truth.
I would agree that it is indeed troubling that in the days following the seizure of the US Embassy in Teheran, and the subsequent bombing of the Embassy in Beirut that resulted in the loss of 14 American lives, the bombings in East Africa that resulted in the loss of 12 American lives, and the 12 Embassy and Consulate bombings during the Bush Administration resulting in approx. 60 loss lives (mostly domestic employees of the Embassies) that the Carter, Reagan, Clinton and Bush administrations failed to take action to improve safety procedures at our Embassies. Hopefully the work Chris Stark alleges is underway to improve security procedures will better protect our State Dept facilities and personnel in the future.
If you are admitting you couldn't get anyone to have consensual sex with you I wouldn't brag about it. Must of cost you a fortune to get them so liquored up they couldn't fend you off. You are lucky, maybe you should be in jail.
Interesting post, especially since it is typical of the distortions of the facts constantly perpetrated by the neo-cons. ONE state has passed "yes means yes"; no other states are in the process of doing so. "Every step in a sexual encounter must be approved" is incorrect. The law is to be applied only when investigating a case when a charge of rape has been made so it is no more invasive than "no means no".
Well I guess the right thinking Congress will block that "stupid move".
Question: If Obama "lead from behind" in Libya as the neo-cons decried, how did he engineer the regime change'?
Smart decision on the part of school system. With the epidemic of childhood diabetes, the number of children who require gluten free diets, are lactose intolerant, or are allergic to eggs, no teacher should have to be responsible to ensure those cupcakes don't get into the hands of the wrong children. As a taxpayer I applaud the school district taking action the minimizes the risk of a law suit.
It is also a sad commentary when not having a cupcake in school equals a loss of childhood. LOL
After reading the numerous postings on this board comparing Obama to Hitler and other Nazis, the signs at Tea Party rallies that pictured a Hitler-like Obama, and living in Alabama for 18 years before retiring two years ago, it requires no suspension of reality on my
to believe the same outrageous behavior is being carried out by neo-con teachers.
Make up your mind. Are you criticizing him for campaigning against global intervention and attempting to keep his promise or are you criticizing him for intervening? I do agree though that Congress should vote on our ISIL strategy. Too bad Boehner is on record saying he does not want the President's strategy to go to a vote in the House.
What a dilemma the Right is going to have if Rand Paul ends up as the GOP candidate in 2016! His isolationist roots run deep ans his position against the level of support the US provides to Israel is well documented.
Truly despicable on the part of the teacher and he/she should be terminated. Of course, on the other hand, I wonder how many "teachers" in neon-con territory have done the same with the current president. And if any parents complained that it was a lack of respect for the office of the president. I assume you would be equally appalled.
Did you miss the part this week when the leadership in both the House and the Senate made it clear that they WANTED the President to go forward and that they did not want to vote on any proposed actions? The cowards in both parties do not want their position to be in the Congressional Recordl. Its easier to criticize without proposing an alternative.
I sincerely hope that the Democratic party never gets back to the "normalcy" that existed in the Democratic party of Orville Faubus, George Wallace, Bull Conner, Strom Thurmond, just to name a view.
So you are a registered Democrat in GA who, as a registered Democrat, has no intent to vote for any Democrat and you are ticked because you are getting campaign literature from Conservative groups? Don't you want to be an educated GOP voter is an "R" after a persons name good enough for you? Surely you don't want to be a low information voter. Also, exactly how many states are you registered to vote in anyway? Why are groups from 6 other states contacting you?
LOL...maybe you need to "eschew" the overuse of the word "obfuscation". If you find Vt's response to be confusing or cannot relate it to your post perhaps he is not engaging in "obfuscation" but rather you have a reading comprehension problem or was never good at doing connect-the-dots as a child.