Imetelstat & Geron are now large investments of Merrill and Fidelity. They will likely add to their holdings, based upon the true market potential here. It seems reasonable to me that we will have a quick recovery. There is money on all sides, and the sensitivities to any news (real or imagined) are enormous. The truth is still in question in the minds of many.
These liver peculiarities (low-grade) are nothing new and nothing dangerous, especially when the primary problem is potentially fatal blood cancer. Mayo is prepared to defend its clinical data plus CR's, PR,s, CI's and continuing trials. Good medicine will always come-out on top. Mayo can be trusted 100%. The FDA is being cautious, and that is part of their job.
These are "low-grade" problems that are likely reversible, non-toxic, and non-life threatening. The Imetelstat story of CR's, PR's, CI's, possible cures and an extended pipeline is still very much intact. The FDA is correct in taking a close look at this before final approval. The FDA is doing its job. Mayo Clinic has the data, and it still looks very good. These side effects are nothing new.
The FDA wants to look into this liver peculiarity in detail. This may be the last obstacle before approval, or disapproval. The FDA does not want to create a liver problem that is potentially worse than the original cancer problem. Since some people have been safely on Imetelstat for a considerable time, that seems highly unlikely. This is the FDA being very cautious, before they "bless" a potential cancer revolution (telomeres, cancer stemcells). This is the time to deal with this situation, not after approval. If the FDA is going to kill Imetalstat, they should do it now in full view.
Mayo will have to defend the medicine, or admit they have been very wrong. These are their clinical trials, and their reputation is on the line. At this point in time, it appears that the benefits of Imetelstat outweigh the risks. We shall see. The FDA is awake.
KEY WORDS: low-order, non-toxic, lifetime (of cancer patient), risk
The LFT (liver function test) problems have been known about for awhile, and appear to be minor compared to the cancer considerations. Imetelstat's overall safety profile is good over an extended period. All cancer treatments have some side effects (especially chemo). Few can talk about CR's, PR's and potential cures. We will see why the FDA jumped on the "low-level" liver problems at this time. Hopefully, this is only a bump in the road. Dr. Tefferi must have known about this, and considered it to be a tolerable problem.
The CR's, PR's and CI's are still with us. " Low-grade" is important. Compare Imetelstat side effects with other cancer drugs; Imetelstat will still do well. This has to do with the quality of life and longevity after treatment.
Safety is now an issue (liver). Key words: low-grade, reversible, long-term, dose, liver. Is the disease worse than the cure? There is still much hope, with an obvious setback.
Bloomberg (Mar.12)--"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration told Geron to place a clinical hold on its mid-stage trials of imetelstat because of low-grade liver function test abnormalities. The regulator cited the potential risk of chronic liver injury following long-term exposure to the drug, Geron said in a statement today.
“The FDA expressed concern about whether these LFT abnormalities are reversible,” the company said. “Geron plans to work diligently with the FDA to seek the release of the clinical hold.”
In November, Geron reported data showing imetelstat helped patients with myelofibrosis, a bone marrow disorder, sending the shares up the most in more than a decade. The clinical hold applies to studies in essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and multiple myeloma. Geron said it’s likely that a planned mid-stage study in myelofibrosis will be delayed."
Participants can access the conference call live via telephone by dialing 866-700-6293 (U.S.); 617-213-8835 (international). The passcode is 52642998. If accessing the conference call by telephone, please dial in at least 10 minutes early to minimize any delay in joining the call. A live audio-only webcast is also available at http://edge.media-server.com/m/p/ipx4axzb/lan/en. The audio webcast of the conference call will be available for replay approximately one hour following the live broadcast through April 12, 2014.
Someday we will get a meaningful update, that most of us believe will continue to be positive. Could be tomorrow, should be tomorrow, but may not be tomorrow. Obviously, this stock is easily manipulated, but good-medicine will issue the final verdict. At some point, the FDA will wakeup from their leisurely nap, and decide to save some lives.
There were actually 6: PLUG, MY, GERN, OXBT, VMEM, CDTI . CDTI (Clean Diesel) is booming today. Geron needs to catch on fire, with FDA "blessings".
That what I think. There are some big announcements coming (FDA, associates, additional Mayo trials, pipeline, etc.) but we don't know when. I hope we are right.
Certainly you are correct. I believe that the Imetelstat story is forthright and honest (95%). It's that other 5% that worries me, and the possibility of a medical-scam. After the Madoff revelations, nobody can be completely trusted, especially if it is market related, IMHO. Regan was correct about, "Trust, but verify". Verifying is not so easy, and not complete in the minds of many.
What are you talking about? What "sky" has fallen? I think you are suggesting that the whole Imetelstat, Mayo operation is some sort of "pie in the sky" fraudulent scheme, led by Dr. T. That has to be 100% wrong, since Mayo stands for honesty, great medicine and excellence. There is already too much positive evidence (PR's, CR's, CI's and potential "cures" or permanent "disease modifications" ), for significant reversals. Nobody is questioning those facts, as we wait for additional results for further confirmations.
Did Dr. T say anything at all about Imetelstat in Indianapolis? It is good that there were no negative announcements, but the silence is deafening. Were the Mayo trials even mentioned? Was there any talk of the "miracle-drug"?
5 years is a statistically calculated number that is arbitrary and convenient. All cancer patients hope for CR a cure. Imetelstat does that.
We all assume that Dr. T showed-up and presented some material. However, even that has not been confirmed on this board. A summary should appear, even if it was a rehash of old material. What did he say, and what questions were asked and answered?
The FDA needs to be impressed, with a little razzmatazz (good science and good medicine). There are lives at stake that can be saved, if the FDA will wake up.