Wasn't that the local Tea Party Hq? They will probably claim that prosecution is persecution and try to chase the cops out of town as usual.............
"...The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. ..."
That wouldn't work for you guys, you can't distinguish a fact from a goat pellet. So you will have to settle for the blood of patriots part. That might be worth a leaf or two growing on the Tree of Liberty.
Just as a room full of monkeys typing away will sooner or later duplicate Shakespeare, you have produced a post with some food for thought in it......
This thread is really funny. The more you guys post the clearer it gets that Lerner, Holder, etc, are just doing their jobs as the law prescribes. Republicans naturally don't like that so they are trying to chase the sheriff out of Dodge. You know the voters wouldn't go for abolishing all those laws.
When you decide to give your partner her monthly bath, you round her up in the back yard, put her in the back of the pickup truck, and run through a car wash, right?
It really wasn't right to put the small shearing pen in your back yard, she should really have a sporting chance to get away. Or is it that you got so old that the arthritis meant she always got away?
Even metro Atlanta, Georgia Tech, etc, don't get Georgia overall out of the red. It's supported by Washington money and the Blue States plus Texas.
The Confederates here all proclaiming their sturdy individualism are on welfare themselves. Of the Red States Texas makes a living as do a couple of low population oil states. Arkansas may about break even. The other Red States are on welfare as they are net negative for taxes to Washington.
Many or most of the "Republican" posters here are on welfare and hate Black Americans. That more or less describes their lives as they portray them here. Disgraceful.
Almost all the Red States, especially in the Confederate culture area are on welfare, supported by Washington programs. They need to be more careful of what they wish fo..................
Given your body of work here there is no likelihood that you voted for Obama. Mentioning Sharpton means that you are just another ROWG - Raging Old White Guy - living in the world of decades ago. Obama and Holder are correct, of course. Did you know that Lee surrendered at Appomattox? It was in all the papers.
If you are in a Red State chances are your whole state is living off social programs through Washington or other programs and money like military bases, etc. We put the grits on your table. That has to stop. All we get in return is destruction.
President Obama is economically more Conservative than his opponents as was Clinton. Your party's program is that 98% of Americans be poor and live in an undeveloped country. Transforming the USA into a Banana Republic is both radical and dysfunctional nonsense, a path to outright failure. You keep calling Obama a Socialist or Communist and clearly have no idea what those terms mean. Look them up Obama's race is obviously a big problem for you. Get over it.
General Lee surrendered at Appomattox. Just thought you might like to know that.
I know you have no facts, only invective as you demonstrate. Does it ever occur to you that having to maintain a position with so many lies means that the position is wrong?
Again it sounds like they are just doing their jobs. Republicans characteristically know that changing those laws wouldn't go down well with the voters, so they are trying to chase the cops out of town.
Issa is famous for lying in his partisan attacks on Democrats and has been exposed by peers on the Right when it just gets too much to stomach.
Is that Richard Mellon Scaife the same one who bankroled the Arkansas Project to attempt to destroy Bill Clinton? It employed large numbers of lawyers and "investigators" for years and made Clinton probably the most investigated person in history to that point. The Arkansas Project failed.
It was characteristic of those nuts that the less they found the more they assumed that their target was a Mastermind instead. A sort of congenital paranoia. Of course they made a lot of money off Scaife as wel for yearsl. Today's hustlers nominally on the Right make a lot of money from our wanna-be Plutocrats too.
In other words they were doing their proper job. They also got a few on the other side as well. The Republicans want to make the laws moot for political reasons.
The software and electronics is also of first importance and not as easy as you may think. Tesla's patents are also a barrier. Another manufacturer would have to develop a competitive product. Tesla's ongoing development makes that even more difficult, Tesla's present task is that development and building up scale as fast as possible all while staying solvent. Not dividends. Both the development and scale are barriers to entry for a cloner.
So convince some of the states in the Confederate culture area to stop playing games with it for political reasons. Then few will complain.
Voter id seems reasonable and I asked for it some years ago when I worked in a Chicago polling place as part of a project to catch irregularities (the tail end of the old Daley machine). But some of the states with new id requirements have specifically made it hard and expensive to get the additional id. They have done this purposely for political reasons. Expensive id in this case amounts to a poll tax too which is illegal though you may like the idea.
Candidates have been alleging voter fraud off and on for years. The parties watch carefully for it where possible. They don't find it. It's usually something on the order of someone voting in the wrong place. For some time, voter fraud is a Republican urban legend. Should we check Republican registration drives?
Why is it that developed countries with Universal Care and years longer life expectancies spend 12% GDP on medical care and the US spends nearly 18%? Without Medicare it would be over 19%. Ryan's Medicare replacement plan sends many billions to insurance companies and pulls the plug on Granny. His philosophy is that people should ideally die in net worth order. Where would that leave you?
Be careful of what you wish for..................
If we could have such a system we would have it already. We can't because the 'take' of the healthcare system overall is bought in Washington, not in any marketplace. It's just under 18% US GDP and rising inexorably though we don't have world standard universal coverage. We don't know if ACA has slowed that rise yet.
If you want Capitalism then we need an Amendment to govern money in politics. If you don't want such an Amendment then you don't want Capitalism / Markets either. A system of crony Capitalism and Plutocracy is the current Republican platform and is not viable. Such a system, an American Banana Republic and updated Confederacy, would fail outright in modern times.
ps - It was Obama's predecessor who deliberately ran the US off a cliff financially in a Starve The Beast attack (look up the Bush II / Nordquist connection)..
The US government is increasingly on sounder financial ground in this President's term. Actually, since Reagan, Republican Presidents have bought an economy with debt. Dems moved over the political center and are more financially conservative or at least add less to the national debt. Republicans are now Confederate, not Conservative. In 2000 the US was on a path to solvency with both parties able to claim some credit for that. By 2008 it was Crashing and in huge debt.
Your idea of tyranny is apparently that the USA isn't in a Depression.
If you don't see billionaires buying the government as tyranny you aren't paying attention. Identifying with people whose interests diverge so much from yours is, IMO, unwise. You can't easily vote them out.
You drank the KoolAid.