must have been really difficult for the guy from netlist to sit and be interviewed with the guy from smart....can't find the interview now...
silver lake has been trying to rub out netlist all along...#$%$ of the Earth!
will sndk need to cover costs to all these oems for money spent qualifying their products...jzm and la pip keep saying how nlst had to reimburse ibm,hp for qualification costs since sales of hyper cloud were much less than expected. One also wonders if sales were hindered by oems waiting for the ultradimm?
Hey check. I read an article the other day. I believe it was somewhere on yahoo. It stated that one would think a technology company would spend lots of money on r and d but it stated that most do not. I have to find it again. It seems that netlist is among the few that have. It takes that much money to come up with innovative game changing technology. It delays the instant gratification that a ceo and shareholders of course want and it especially does when others try and profit on the back of blood,sweat and tears put into just that-game changing technology.
none of them mention netlist. One article by mohr says that sndk has become a cult stock. That its owners/shareholders will come and defend it . It states that they last a big customer. Cramer in another article states that their products are being rejected. But no mention of ultradimm or netlist. Now you see how crooked these writers/analysts/manipulators are. How relevant is this news of injunction on ultradimm? VERY relevant!
and clients/RBC had to take their profit in SNDK before this injunction took place......or sell out. Sndk rated a d- red on IBD. Or it was a d- on the day it got knocked down.
as I have said :is the press controlled this much by big corporations? where are the investigative reporters trying to find the truth? or is there too much MONEY involved here? They don't want to shine a light on it before they buy enough netlist? and or COVER! WE can not be that much smarter! All I can say is WOW!
again...wow! unbelievable find! 10 stars! texas stars! haven't found what cyber refers to yet....
great find yankee...seems that a higher standard will be taken and deference will be given to the court who gave the ruling and that the review court has to find clear error...no more will it be that the case is looked as it never was tried and the review(appeals court) court has to find error in its ruling according to statute ,rules, or precedent! wow!
considered a delay to bring another attorney up to speed? when did they submit this request? remember the judge saying she would have no games. On schedule.