1.54 !! Is that the best IMSC has got after QPL ?! ROFL !!! You losers had higher stock prices 2-3 years ago lol. You also left a gap at 1.41 today which will be filled when the volume dies down in the next few days. Meanwhile this stock still continues to be around double IMSC's stock price so was obviously the better investment ever since you have been posting all your inane stupid comments here for the last years. Btw this company has a strategy, it's smart and it involves collaborating with the market leaders in its field not foolishly trying to out compete them with no money like your stupid company is doing. Ha, back to 1.40 for you losers soon lol !!
I am pleased for you and other IMSC shareholders who have had to wait very patiently for your company to belatedly deliver on their promises but just don't be surprised if your stock starts heading down again. I believe over the long term 1.40 is hard resistance in your stock. Why ? Because that is where the large majority of the management options hang out and DMRJ will want to unload all their options before management do and they will start with the 1.18 and 1.12 options and probably put the price back down to there while they wait for any IDIQ and then rinse and repeat the process until all their 0.08 options are done too and then management still have to unload all their 1.40 options then. Too many insider fingers in your pie.
yeah but when you first posted here it was 0.50-1.30 so it has done far better than IMSC which has gone backwards in the same time. Also it has taken IMSC $50+m debt just to get to the same place two other companies reached 10 years ago which is not that impressive especially as DMRJ still have tens of millions of 8c options which they will now rain on you. Also it is good that ASTC reached 4.59 from 0.50, when do you think IMSC will ever reach 2 ?! lol
Was not unexpected and means very little without appreciable orders. Here's where we find out how seriously different or not a third IMS detector is to the TSA. Your stock also only hit 1.40, it was higher a couple of years ago before ACSTL and QPL certs when it hit 1.84 and that is a testament to all the DMRJ dilution and most of that is still to come yet.
Wow you really are a very sick child in an adult's body. I told you in my last post and many times before how I defined the support at 3.07, a price the stock will always return to, in fact today it was at the open and I have been proved right every time since declaring it as support no matter how many times you wet your little girl panties when it dips below 3 like today. It is support which is especially pronounced during high volume days. During low volume days it can dip below it but that is not significant given the low volume. On those days the 90 MA (currently 2.82 and rising) is hard support as I told you earlier yet again. Now go away child, lesson over.
' ASTC is a sub-$3 stock'
So explain in your very tiny finite wisdom how the stock has closed over $3 the last 3 days with an intra-day high of 3.18 ? Ever since I stated 3.07 was Support anybody who has wanted to sell at that price has just had to wait and the stock has invariably returned to that price no matter how many dips below $3 you have wet you little girly panties over. That is what support looks like and acts like, Clown !
It hit 3.07 earlier this morning imbecile and you said it would never hit it again only a few days ago !!
IDIOTIC LYING CLUELESS ALWAYS WRONG CLOWN !!!
... meanwhile back in the real world of real charts and real TA the stock has gone up 5 times over the past year ...
'What do you think S's strategy is to remove nuclear material from their ETD platform?'
Conceivably looking at the most favorably outcome for IMSC it could be not to even bother with non-radioactive IMS if it is too difficult in which case the TSA's next future ETDs could be all yours if non-radioactivity becomes mandatory as both Smiths and Morpho have other product lines which are profitable so they do not necessarily need ETDs for now which have been good ROI over the last decade for both and for which they may feel not worth continuing with at least in the current IMS format and so they may go straight on to the next-gen MS which are probably easier to make non-radioactive.
p.s. I can have sensible discussions with you (and posithinki sometimes when he is not being too defensive) unlike many of the other emotional children here who can not discuss any facts about the competitors without throwing childish tantrums.
More typical disingenuous lies from the sad jealous IMSC pumper. The Spacetech (which is 1stDetect) sales have been non-zero ever since the product was released as can be verified from every 10-Q/K and initially they were reported on in the earnings PRs but the company feels no need to report every sale like this company does so once again you are making up lies as befits the lying classless guy you are.
'How has your stock made a pile of money? Explain that one to me.'
Because it rose from the 63c range a year ago dumbo but you already knew that because you was still bashing the stock at that price with your previous equally dumb aliases like shawtysuckinwind. 4.59 was a price hit around 5 mins on the day the LMT sale of ASO was announced and is no way indicative of the price range ASTC has come from over the last 4 years since 2010 which is generally around 1. You already know that though and are just being disingenuous because you don't like the cold hard facts which is ASTC has gone up 5 times since 2011 and this stock has gone backwards from 1.84 from *BEFORE* ACSTL qualification.
The stock has been at or over 3.07 the last 3 days clown and will keep returning there time and time again just like I predicted but then again you are just the sad little jealous IMSC pumper who looks on envy at those who made the smart choice here unlike pathetic sad you. The low in the past 12 months was 63c so a five fold gain is pretty good in that year. As for 4.59 that was the LMT sale high volume day and was a temporary peak that day and not indicative of the closing price that or any other day.
yeah tell me again how the ASTC won't see 3.07 again after the 6th time it has after you claimed it would not ;-). Brainless Idiot.
This company fascinates me, like watching a weekly soap full of drama and intrigue. Will the reality ever match the tremendous hype ? Tune in next and every week to find out the answer ;-).
Actually my post was neutral as it showed there was an EDS portion to that contract and I made no comment as to whether the ETD portion was materially significant going forward. Once again you sad blind devoted pumpers can not even handle plain facts when presented without any bias.
It's also for the X-Ray equipment. Whether the ETD part of that is intended to be a big ongoing portion we have no idea of that level of granularity from the PR.
The problem as I see it is technical. The stock went up a lot on high volume which was not sustained after hitting the peak. So that is unwinding and finding volume again at lower levels. It will hit proper support and then reverse back up after this effect is fully done as the long term chart is very good with moving average support stretching back years.
The yearly trailing eps has also turned positive and it would be nice if Yahoo got around to updating their figure to show that as the negative eps being shown is giving out the wrong impression to a casual observer. The positive eps is even greater taking out the one-off discontinued loss in one of the last 4 quarters.
'Are you talking about the 20nm Exynos 5430 SoC? It's just a die shrink of an existing SoC (with an updated A15 and other IP blocks).'
which went from a clock speed of 1.9 GHz to 1.8 GHz at 20nm. Also the 5433's A57 clockspeed is only 1.3 GHz at 20nm. Considering the updated version of the A15 they are using (like Nvidia's K1) runs at 0.1V less voltage thus using less power this is a terrible process update. For them not to even reproduce the clockspeed they had at 28nm with a more power-efficient updated design speaks volume about the true health of their 20nm and why they won't offer it as a foundry option instead going straight to 14FF for external customers. The last time I saw a process update this bad was on the first 65nm Athlon64s and in the end the 90nm Athlon64s had a longer selling life as they were faster and more power efficient.
'The problem is that there are 5-6 direct competitors to the 1stDetect product'
only in your warped imagination.
You clueless #$%$, and we have had many of those over the years bashing this company and stock on this board, Thermo is the brand name Rigaku use in this type of product. Here's the previous Rigaku Thermo analyzer generation that used bigger heavier quadrupole ion technology
The tandem technology (ms/ms) in the latest Rigaku variant is 1stDetect's and is unique on the market as everybody else invariably uses quadrupole ions for smaller mass spectrometers.