They should RUN away from India. In fact a strongly worded statement immediately that gives shareholders clarity is what Nok mngmt. needs to provide. They should not wait , delay or stay silent. Litigation is a the failure of negotiation and this is where both of those have gotten us....A STATEMENT TODAY, UNEQUIVOCAL LOUD AND CLEAR...NOKIA IS DONE WITH FUGGIN INDIA
Ya, what's with all the mysteriousness? This is a good question that deserves an answer since it was brought up If someone has info to share, share it. At least, why not answer basic questions posted to your thread?
Doesnt look like itll work for me. I was looking at Tweed for anyone interested in that kind of thing. Supposed to be listed on TSX in next few weeks
Thanks for taking care of that....im not able to respond to foolish fools and their foolhardy foolishness. Its just a vague gray name....
I got the $10 but that was awhile back. Got them for .32 and they did real well and sold half. They've come back down considerably at .38 or so....Anyway, $12 is a little too optimistic for me.
Ya. Agree, I have Jan.15 $10 calls that I've been holding for awhile. I sold half of my original position for a double a while back and was looking for more, but they fell off....so I'll hold them. This Apr. purchase was really just speculation on a near term pop. Done well with nok options so far. I had $5 and $7 that I got doubles and triples on that I got before deal was announced...
I may have made that buy yesterday out of boredom....now that think about it.
Thanks! Anyway I'll see how it goes. Holding those Jan $10 long & strong. Short term calls decay so quickly.....not a good idea to be holding Aprils at end of March if this hasn't moved by then.
I wouldn't be to.eager to see that boss. I know a reporter at the WSJ and those guys do serious investigative journalism. The interview was pumped and then never mentioned again despite numerous requests for info. A couple days after the interview was supposed to happen, there was a post about FINRA calling....
And btw, are you even cognizant of how stupid you sound? I didn't make a "mistake" I sold for a profit. Holding while my investment dwindled 20% would have been a mistake. I didn't" lose" any shares....i sold them, for a tidy profit. In other words I MADE A PROFIT AND BOOKED A GAIN. Narcissists like yourself are incapable of understanding that there are SMARTER people in the world.
Untenable should be available to you in a DICTIONARY. I did not mean unattainable.
I did sell, if you look at the chart it was right in that spike on Monday morning. If I want to buy back, it will be under that so I made money. Do you understand? I buy low, and sell high. I do not become emotionally attached to a financial decision, and don't take offense when someone has a differing opinion. They did get you once, and now they got you again because you have become rigid (which is different than strong) . You will try to be the tree now and will break when the wind comes, instead of the grass which will bend. You are a fool, all can see it, few will say it.
I also.dont like people.like you who lie, getting newbies sucked.in over their.heads to lose their money. Its shameful. I will present views, both pro and con, to discuss rationally what risks vs. reward there may be at a gi en time, as it is not a static situation. You have become somewhat like a #$%$ following dogma....threatening people, having hysterical fits, making lists, attempting to invalidate other perspectives. You're kind of disgusting actually, and I mean that in the most logical and thoughtful way.
You have a very simplistic and narrow view of investing that will not serve you well in the end. This black and white vision you're seeing is emotionally based and untenable in the long term. To people that have been around awhile you present yourself as a fool. One that talks a lot when should be listening. Compound stupidity =you don't know, that you don't know.
"Its easier to fool people, than to convince people that they've been fooled"