Michael- I have a MS in Economics and the very premise of my post dealt with "supply and demand", i.e. that the King cuts supply to drive oil up to a price ($60 to $75?) when he can make a lot more money, and yet have it still tough for others.
...range, which is really a good long term range. The king can make more money on the higher price even pumping less, and as oil is still a finite and needed resource, and will be for a long time, it is smart for them to not sell it too cheaply or pump too much. He will have already done a lot of damage to Iran and Russia, (and shown them his power) and hurt fracking and tar sands, deep water, etc who really need $100 oil to thrive. At $65 oil PBR looks pretty good. $10 to $15 if that happened?
and you sound paranoid littlechicken. I guess in your small mind everyone has multiple ID's like you. You really do need to get a life.
chickenshitlittle is so disingenuous and such a liar and mean spirited chump. So what if BABA (which I don't own) is down from $104 to $95 or whatever in the very short term Not everyone is as smart as you and can pick the exact bottom, and make money on every purchase, even on a stock like NOK that has been consistently down for over a year. We all believe you.
chickensheet, so why did you not post back then?. In just the few months you have been here you have posted a ton under chicken and even more with YOUR fake ID's. You did not post at all when NOK was $3 or $4, (I did) yet you started posting massively when NOK was $7 and over $8?? Yeah little chicken we all believe you. We really do. Are you so stupid that you think this board can have any affect on NOK price? Because you seem to just hate anyone who posts the truth ( I guess the would include Klimski) about how poorly NOK has done for so long. I realize this board is everything to you, but really are you seriously happy that some poster may have lost on BABA and need to rub it in like a 7th grade mean girl? Get a life!
That's your paranoia talking little chicken, but someone has (you?) claimed wrongly that I have about 10 different ID's based on using similar words, or posting similar things about how poorly NOK has done, or ID's created in the same year. What kind of loser would do such research and yet get it wrong? Thanks for repeating the headline, chump.
any life whatsoever outside this board?. All day on this board with his paranoia, and pettiness. Count those thumbs littlechicken, (and all your aliases) you paranoid fool. NOK stock, and having to lie about how long you have owned it (only on YHOO message boards for a couple of months yet claims to have owned for 3 years) and bought at exact low, and never lost on, it shows an insecure, dishonest chump you are. Well yet another buying opportunity for the apologists. Lets get that share price below $3 and share count above $5B. NOK down in good market, and down in bad market. Management should resign!
Sorry little chicken I do not know Klimski but there are numerous people on this board that agree with me that NOK has been a terrible stock for a long time because those are simply the facts. And what's with your homophobic stuff, and so what if I were gay? Yes I call you a liar and fool because your posts prove that and you are consistently wrong about NOK, But by making sexual (or racial, etc.) comments (the truth about you can not know) you really show what a low class, ignorant individual you are. To the Jersey shore guy, no, but direct waterfront property in Connecticut, so you are not too far off at least on location. Hey count those thumbs, chump.
Well that is a pretty meaningless point, but if one is desperate like you then they have to pick a date that works for them., as calender year (barely) does here for you If a stock goes from $10 to 30 in a calender year but you don't sell and it then drops to $2 on Jan 2, are you happy with your results? . I can only wish I had been short (or out) NOK this past year, but am only long in shares and options. I still think it is very undervalued which makes its terrible (except in your fantasy world) performance for over a year now harder to take. Do you even know what being disingenuous means? You certainly lose all your arguments on the merits.
...pick dates to come up with a tiny 20 cent or so year gain for NOK . With any stock if you cherry pick pick a date, or even time of day, you can make it look good. How is NOK doing from Dec 2013 high ($8.50 plus) to now? How about from 2010 until now? Dow is up over 200 now and yet NOK still down 14 cents even after yesterday's drop. Hey chump, explain that away. You are not just a chump and loser but a liar and bad person, with your schadenfreude-( you and your frenchie will have to look that one up). When you still held NOK at $8.73 last summer did you think it would be down so much now? Are you capable of being honest?
sydney, thnaks for the answer BUT they sure have not bought back many shares (and gave those to execs. hence the increase share count) and wasn't the MSFT $2B NSN loan part of the net cash they had before MSFT purchase of devises? Something very wrong with this company as it really does get no respect from the market.
Well they got $7.5B from MSFT deal and had net cash before deal of something like $3B , so approx.r $10B net cash then minus $2B for div (really $1.8B) for $8B but plus the two q's of $500mil. earnings for plus $1Bl. $ so that would seem to be $9B net cash. So where did the missing $3 or 4B cash go if they only have $5B cash ??? Yes they paid off a little debt but that should alread be reflected in net. They certainly have not bought back many shares.
That's the main problem is they are not buying shares. If they had used 1/2 to 3/4 of their cash to buy back shares (and showed a little confidence in company) NOK would be trading MUCH higher now. They are actually increasing shares out to reward poor execs. who have sat back and watched shares drop for over a year.
bananas500, you are being disingenuous. Yes NOK went up 100% in a 6 month period but in the 14 months since it is down. And in the numerous years before that MSFT deal window NOK was down something like 90%. So NOK has been a terrible stock for most of last decade, (for you long term investors). If NOK were up 20 cents today instead of being down I would be happy with the small gain, but point that with the way NOK was set up by MSFT it should already be over $10. I am long but unlike the management apologists can admit that I was wrong in believing in NOK and buying more after the brief run up, (which I benefited from greatly) I may soon have to sell off much as am really losing faith in this management's ability. Suri should not be CEO but head of just NSN.
...thumbs up or down. He just referred to some other poster getting 20 red thumbs (little chicken, no one but you is so pathetic as to even pay them any attention to them, much less count them). I don't use them but if I did obviously you would get them from me so you can add those to your running total (do you use your aliases' to give them also?) Grow up dude.
frenchie, I don't even know who groovinirvan is, does he post here? Are you happy with another drop on NOK? Happy with all the shares out and rewarding management with more free shares at our expense? You and YOUR aliases) are either employees of NOK or just too dumb and dishonest to admit you have been wrong.