Fri, Aug 29, 2014, 7:41 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Alimera Sciences, Inc. (ALIM) Message Board

mgideonco 58 posts  |  Last Activity: Aug 25, 2014 2:45 PM Member since: Mar 11, 2004
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Facts.....Buy as much as you can....NOW

    by kellys07642 Aug 25, 2014 2:34 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Aug 25, 2014 2:45 PM Flag

    waiting on your next observations regarding punctuation...but i don't think you got that down yet. cheers, and keep up the good work.

  • Reply to

    give the whining a rest

    by mgideonco Aug 20, 2014 2:06 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Aug 20, 2014 4:18 PM Flag

    i was only kidding with the rodney king joke. i wouldn't want to meet most of the posters here. i am just fed up with the school yard #$%$. but then, it's your yard, not mine. i am going to go wait in the shade, fall is coming.

  • the back and forth is unnecessary. the time line has been set, and the count down begins in october. try to maintain a positive attitude without over pumping and give up on the negative response to any positive information. please, the tit for tat is ridiculous, although not uncommon on message boards of stocks with high potential. agitation is a players game, whether it is positive or negative. can't we all just get along?

  • mgideonco mgideonco Aug 18, 2014 1:31 PM Flag

    "As to their decisions on how and when to PR, for someone flipping, such notices are invaluable." nok mentioned this and it flew right over you head. this is the difference between investors and speculators; that is to say, speculators have no patience. stop squirming. you have a time line, end of the year; work with that.

  • Reply to

    So far its everthing you read in the 10-Q

    by rhallzng Aug 18, 2014 11:16 AM
    mgideonco mgideonco Aug 18, 2014 1:20 PM Flag

    these newsworthy elements would be better served by the author of the previous seeking alpha articles. perhaps you should contact him to see when he is going to do a follow up report. those articles did a lot to boost interest in eltp several month ago. i agree with you regarding the release of the information.

  • Reply to

    Excellent Q1 results!!!!

    by base.jumper55 Aug 14, 2014 4:25 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Aug 14, 2014 5:26 PM Flag

    i am trying to extrapolate the buy on rumor-sell blah blah blah to the CC on the 18th. there was no apparent buy...up 5% off the lows...because there was no true rumor. so are we back to 30 after the CC, or stay where we are now until the study results are published? also, trying to figure who the manipulators are...too small for a hedge fund? underminers from another company? there can't be much to made from shorting with this little movement, although enough to make rent money if you own lots of shares. sluggish summer all around. patience will out.

  • Reply to

    Symmetrical triangle since Aug 4th expecting...

    by jrdelane Aug 13, 2014 1:51 AM
    mgideonco mgideonco Aug 14, 2014 3:33 PM Flag

    it is beginning to look like there will be no news except earnings for the next CC. this is a waiting game.

  • Reply to

    Six Trading Days To Go

    by rfwelsh Aug 6, 2014 11:11 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Aug 7, 2014 2:01 AM Flag

    do you think the pps will rise much before submission. after all manipulation we have watched since the cc in early spring, the investors seem gun shy. it doesn't matter to me, i am long and willing to wait, i just wonder what you expect for this go round. i appreciate what you have put together here, as do many others, and this is just a simple question with no agenda. i have slipped into a wait and see mode, and stopped watching and listening (for the most part...the list of ignored posts is deep). also, i now expect time lines to stretch to the limit, that is to say, submission in late december. again, thank you for sharing your research and summation, and i appreciate your enthusiasm. my year and a day isn't up until november anyway, so day to day, week to week, month to month, these are less significant...you neither win nor lose until you sell. i intend to hold into 2016, and remain positive. glta, except the billy taylor types; they should swell up and break their feet.

  • Reply to

    Purdue's approval for an ADT product

    by no2koolaid69 Jul 23, 2014 7:31 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jul 24, 2014 1:56 PM Flag

    could you identify the source of the quote, please.

  • Reply to

    Up yesterday

    by broken_investor Jul 17, 2014 2:47 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jul 17, 2014 6:57 PM Flag

    we didn't give it all back. time to get a second hobby.

  • Reply to

    Actavis

    by balakeatery Jul 7, 2014 11:43 AM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jul 7, 2014 1:30 PM Flag

    sorry, but your comments make no sense...how can there be "frontrunners" if no one makes contact.

  • Reply to

    My thoughts and Happy 4th to All

    by jp_isco Jul 4, 2014 11:09 AM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jul 4, 2014 5:26 PM Flag

    it is encouraging that HN has determined there is no stopping it. given his knowledge of the chemistry, the process, and the incremental proof he sees daily in reports he receives in-house, those words carry weight, and i get the feeling that he knows what he has working. come december, come 2015, come 2016, come what may, the solutions are in sight.

  • Reply to

    Elite share buy back?

    by gordonhoochie Jul 2, 2014 10:10 AM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jul 2, 2014 11:19 AM Flag

    i believe if you read the cc you will see they said 5 easy, not 1-2 drugs to approval.

  • Reply to

    Nobody can

    by pennyflipper Jul 1, 2014 12:46 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jul 1, 2014 1:04 PM Flag

    why do you care?

  • mgideonco mgideonco Jun 30, 2014 8:02 PM Flag

    you appear to have extrapolated quite a bit of information from the filed document. care to explain in detail how you arrived at all these details. if year over year revenues are up 38% and hakim says it was a spectacular year, how can all your negatives add up to those positives? looking for your math, not name calling and opinion, just math and site data, please. I don't see your figures supported in the document. thank you

  • Reply to

    IHUB deletions

    by no2koolaid69 Jun 22, 2014 3:25 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jun 22, 2014 10:07 PM Flag

    hello, no2...because your post is in some ways a question, implies that you are trying to understand the rejection of your post and are soliciting responses to your quandary. let me begin by stating that i am not perfect, no one is really, but some of strive for more clarity in our conclusions. if my comments are helpful, then fine. my first point has to do with your posting above, you make a quote of the challenge you were given. "challenged me to offer a "shred blah blah " but then you closed the quote. what are we to make of the proof of evidence? for what is the evidence necessary? are we to conclude that you altered the rest of the statement that any pharma company was paying attention to elite? and why would you do that anyway, why would you not completely quote the statement, challenge, as it was posted or email to you? that creates an element of doubt as to you intention. i am not suggesting you have a hidden agenda, only that it appears that way.
    now, regarding your reply...try not to answer a question with another question. people tend to do that for two reasons, at least, one being to redirect the conversation because of some inadequacy in the original question, and the other being to redirect conversation because you don't have the answer or you are playing to an audience. this is just a thought. again, no one is perfect.
    as to your argument, it is self cancelling. if every big pharma is watching everyone, then no one ios special, and even if you could show an incident that suggests they are interested in a company, you would have to prove it wasn't routine research, emotionless data collection to be available should interest perk up down the road. it's the old everyone is special so no one is special. again, my perspective is that you offered no new information to prove you point.
    lastly, next time you are asked for proof, refer the individual to the last conference can where N talked about ongoing talks with several potential partner

  • Reply to

    Seven years ago

    by billjazzman May 31, 2014 6:28 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jun 20, 2014 12:18 PM Flag

    brilliant sale...way to stay ahead of the curve...not only did you leave 8-10000 on the table, but you will pay capital gains and the cost of the sale. you certainly know what you are doing, and with only 10 days left before you sell it all. glad there are still some "adults" on this board.

  • Reply to

    run along little children

    by billy.taylor24 Jun 17, 2014 1:24 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jun 17, 2014 1:50 PM Flag

    OZ the magnificent

  • Reply to

    Elite is in trouble

    by timduy Jun 5, 2014 11:22 AM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jun 9, 2014 9:21 PM Flag

    not to mention discussing yourself in the third person.

  • Reply to

    selling tomorrow

    by bigal22lanaz Jun 9, 2014 8:37 PM
    mgideonco mgideonco Jun 9, 2014 9:20 PM Flag

    barely 2 percent? 2.86. and you think you have a keen grasp of the situation? is that not a distortion of the facts? how do you categorize that comment, using your sense of fairness?

ALIM
6.29+0.04(+0.64%)Aug 29 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.