waiting on your next observations regarding punctuation...but i don't think you got that down yet. cheers, and keep up the good work.
i was only kidding with the rodney king joke. i wouldn't want to meet most of the posters here. i am just fed up with the school yard #$%$. but then, it's your yard, not mine. i am going to go wait in the shade, fall is coming.
the back and forth is unnecessary. the time line has been set, and the count down begins in october. try to maintain a positive attitude without over pumping and give up on the negative response to any positive information. please, the tit for tat is ridiculous, although not uncommon on message boards of stocks with high potential. agitation is a players game, whether it is positive or negative. can't we all just get along?
"As to their decisions on how and when to PR, for someone flipping, such notices are invaluable." nok mentioned this and it flew right over you head. this is the difference between investors and speculators; that is to say, speculators have no patience. stop squirming. you have a time line, end of the year; work with that.
these newsworthy elements would be better served by the author of the previous seeking alpha articles. perhaps you should contact him to see when he is going to do a follow up report. those articles did a lot to boost interest in eltp several month ago. i agree with you regarding the release of the information.
i am trying to extrapolate the buy on rumor-sell blah blah blah to the CC on the 18th. there was no apparent buy...up 5% off the lows...because there was no true rumor. so are we back to 30 after the CC, or stay where we are now until the study results are published? also, trying to figure who the manipulators are...too small for a hedge fund? underminers from another company? there can't be much to made from shorting with this little movement, although enough to make rent money if you own lots of shares. sluggish summer all around. patience will out.
it is beginning to look like there will be no news except earnings for the next CC. this is a waiting game.
do you think the pps will rise much before submission. after all manipulation we have watched since the cc in early spring, the investors seem gun shy. it doesn't matter to me, i am long and willing to wait, i just wonder what you expect for this go round. i appreciate what you have put together here, as do many others, and this is just a simple question with no agenda. i have slipped into a wait and see mode, and stopped watching and listening (for the most part...the list of ignored posts is deep). also, i now expect time lines to stretch to the limit, that is to say, submission in late december. again, thank you for sharing your research and summation, and i appreciate your enthusiasm. my year and a day isn't up until november anyway, so day to day, week to week, month to month, these are less significant...you neither win nor lose until you sell. i intend to hold into 2016, and remain positive. glta, except the billy taylor types; they should swell up and break their feet.
it is encouraging that HN has determined there is no stopping it. given his knowledge of the chemistry, the process, and the incremental proof he sees daily in reports he receives in-house, those words carry weight, and i get the feeling that he knows what he has working. come december, come 2015, come 2016, come what may, the solutions are in sight.
you appear to have extrapolated quite a bit of information from the filed document. care to explain in detail how you arrived at all these details. if year over year revenues are up 38% and hakim says it was a spectacular year, how can all your negatives add up to those positives? looking for your math, not name calling and opinion, just math and site data, please. I don't see your figures supported in the document. thank you
hello, no2...because your post is in some ways a question, implies that you are trying to understand the rejection of your post and are soliciting responses to your quandary. let me begin by stating that i am not perfect, no one is really, but some of strive for more clarity in our conclusions. if my comments are helpful, then fine. my first point has to do with your posting above, you make a quote of the challenge you were given. "challenged me to offer a "shred blah blah " but then you closed the quote. what are we to make of the proof of evidence? for what is the evidence necessary? are we to conclude that you altered the rest of the statement that any pharma company was paying attention to elite? and why would you do that anyway, why would you not completely quote the statement, challenge, as it was posted or email to you? that creates an element of doubt as to you intention. i am not suggesting you have a hidden agenda, only that it appears that way.
now, regarding your reply...try not to answer a question with another question. people tend to do that for two reasons, at least, one being to redirect the conversation because of some inadequacy in the original question, and the other being to redirect conversation because you don't have the answer or you are playing to an audience. this is just a thought. again, no one is perfect.
as to your argument, it is self cancelling. if every big pharma is watching everyone, then no one ios special, and even if you could show an incident that suggests they are interested in a company, you would have to prove it wasn't routine research, emotionless data collection to be available should interest perk up down the road. it's the old everyone is special so no one is special. again, my perspective is that you offered no new information to prove you point.
lastly, next time you are asked for proof, refer the individual to the last conference can where N talked about ongoing talks with several potential partner
brilliant sale...way to stay ahead of the curve...not only did you leave 8-10000 on the table, but you will pay capital gains and the cost of the sale. you certainly know what you are doing, and with only 10 days left before you sell it all. glad there are still some "adults" on this board.
barely 2 percent? 2.86. and you think you have a keen grasp of the situation? is that not a distortion of the facts? how do you categorize that comment, using your sense of fairness?