Research In Motion Limited Message Board

Here is the quote "ITG says that initial cheks have indicated that the Qwerty-equipped Q10 have racked far fewer sales than its touchscreen sibling, the z10, in Blackberry's home country of Canada"
What that statement attempts to state is when comparing the initial sales data of q10 verses z10, that the sales of the z10, are far superior to those of the q10..nothing could be further than the truth.
Any judge will throw out the argument from ITG that the whole world misunderstood what it attempted to communicate in its report.
The purpose of the first sentence is to give readers and potential q10 buyers the perception that the device sales are worse than z10's launch launch sales.
The ITG report attempts to create doubt in the in the mind of the potential q10 buyer.
Since most smartphone buyers do not play the markets, they do to know that this kind of article was designed to manipulate them.
They do not know that billions of dollars are at stake for hedge shorts.
All they know is that somewhere they read that qwerty 10 sales are lower than z10 sales.
If they were thinking of getting a q10 device, now they may have doubt because in their heads they expect qwerty 10 devices to be more popular. So why are the q10 sales down? Maybe something wrong with the devices?
The manipulation attempt is two fold.
It tries to rob bbry of q10 sales by planting a seed of doubt in the head of the potential buyer
and it tries to paint the picture that initial sales of q10 in Canada are less than z10 and by saying this retail investors may revise the earnings umbels and decide not to buy or even sell their bbry shares.
ITG is guilty

Your report filled with lies is a blatant attempt to destroy public trust of the company's brand name.
Blackberry has been encouraged to pass the report to its legal department, the OSC and the SEC.

You are the hired hand of Pacific.
Your report is an attempt to deviate the attention of the SEC from
Looking into possible trade irregularities of your sponsor.
Your report is worth 0 on 10.
You get an F.
Even when you issue a corrected statement in which you disclose
That you made errors, the SEC will conclude that your sponsor benefitted from your article
And thus you could be charged for collusion and sued by blackberry

0 on 10
Using the opinion of ITG which is the propaganda arm of Pacific ......laziness gets ou an F

Content of blog, opinion and its conclusion ....is extremely naive
Who paid for the bloggist to write it?
None of the two will die anytime soon.
What a stupid headline!

by 3?
this stock is almost as possessed as bbry

Eom

Don t buy any options .
Write out of the money calls instead
Then if the share crashes by another 20 percent you could buy to close the calls you wrote at a lower price and pocket the difference

An answer for the meredithian mangia-cake.
They go up when buyers believe that even at "market price" the share is underpriced and has room to climb.
I know the mangia-cake knows the answer.
He only asked the question to show people how condescending and arrogant and ill informed he really is.
And share prices go down, when there are more shares being sold at market price than there are bid offers to buy, which then can propel it down as sellers actually lower their price, sometimes lower than the market bid.
The total debt of a company means nothing as the share price is determined by supply of shares being sold and the market's desire to buy it or chase it up.
Recent shares of several solar companies have flared up for no apparent reason.
Almost all have debt and none have profits.
Some are trading over 30 dollars.
For as long as a company pays the interest on its debt, and for as long as eps is improving, and for as long as cash burn is reduced,and sales are going up, and cost of sales is reduced; for as long as margins are improved, then buyers invest on the expectation that a company will become profitable
and the market is a mirror of the sentiment.
Some days buyers are chasing.
Some days sellers are dumping at any price.
Hope that helps you the meredithian mangiacake and all of his students.
Next time if you ask a question do not shout it, or copy a stupid question that I would expect from a supermarket tabloid.
You can do much better than that.
Amen?
Here have a scotch.
You can do better.

Sentiment: Hold

An amazing product and business services income plan.
But the company has yet to side up with "powerful hedge funds"
Profits will jump at a compound rate.
Share should have been at 20 months ago.
All this "ping ponging" as Cramer said.
It looks like this share has become a "wash trade target"
SEC should call him in , drill him on a lie detector test
I suspect he knows

Beware of those stocks.
None are making money

Consider yourself reported.

Over exposed to decaf coffee and to lie filled blogs, he sometimes knows not the difference between white and black. His recent post about the DOD is inaccurate and is based on overexposure to bloggists and analysts with deceiptful agendas.

We need to return to the 16 level before stating that what was lost in value was recouped.
For the day I would like to see a close of 15.22 or higher