face down with someone with an academic finance and analytic engineering education.
AS a further for alloro(s) BS attempting to dispute a poster(s) actual JCP mall experience with a non-date specific parking lot image.
This is from ‘Westfield’ one of a number of business that I follow for information relating to ‘Mall management’ and indication(s) of retailing leasing pressure.
“We obtain entering and exiting traffic statistics from anti-theft scanning columns installed at primary mall entrances. Historical survey data established these measurements are statistically deficit for determining specific establishment traffic demand. Survey data indicates that entrance and related exit flow is relative to driving access convenience determined by the customer’s personal experience. Therefore we depend upon the sales and margin return per square foot contractually required data provided by lessees to determine relative lease rates.”
In other words entrance/exit traffic is determined by customer traffic convenience___not a ‘want to get in2 Sears or Macy(s) or whatever store. This is an illustration for how some investment neophytes will try to mine irrelevant data to support a continually flawed thesis.
would be a welcome event.
We hv had *8 to 14% runups in certain sectors purchased 10/13 & 15___asset allocation dictates that we may need to take some profits again.
The forward coming EOY tax adjustment positioning may provide an opportunity to again adust our sector exposure. If a retest presents I wl b looking at whether the sectors that broke out to the upside will exhibit relative strength, money flow and "On Balance Volume" positive pressure. If those sectors do not hold__then I wld expect lower index lows. No matter I believe a retesting opp (if bought for asset adjustments) will be (feel good) in the late 1st qtr in2 2nd qtr 2015.
There shld b selected asset or sector specific CEFs that wl present themselves at very attractive discounts to NAV
What I believe fueled this is the moronic idiocy of your comparison attempt__U later claimed an aerial view__after initially posting a non-specified view. Even with the aerial view if you try to rotate the view it comes up with various image dates referencing back as far as 2012.
Your aerial view does not provide a specific date__but just as a footnote refers to a 2014 software engine version. That is not an indication of capture date___however, if we gave u that the image is a 2014 capture__the poster reported a specific date experience for visiting a store. U on the other hand provide a possible ‘what date??’ in the 2014 capture.
Again it is the moronic idiocy of ur comparison and ur posting history personality for trying to manipulate information into the category of misinformation that has most likely fueled this subject response.
As I posted b4 shorts apparently need to resort to out right lying!!
Recent yes would be correct for two months__you posted 'just'.
U consistently have a problem with posting accuracy.
Definition of just used as an adverb::
--at this or exact moment in time
Definition of recently used as an adverb:
--during a recent period of time
--of or relating to a time not long past
It seems maybe you should revisit primary education vocabulary. I quess u could try GED books!!
You should try stand up at 2nd city.
'just cut' CYS announced that on Sep 9th for the 10/15 payment__there is no end to your moronic ability to post misinformation.
Oh I just thought about this__ur post claimed u cld view the number of cars parked within the pkng area of JCP versus SHLD______So now u r trying 2 claim an 'Aerial view" is more denfinitive than a 'Street view'.
Ur a totally full of brown sheeets. U just made that post up______if u cannot bring actual FACTS to this boards discussion__then excuse urself as the manipulative moron that U R!!!!
I may or may not give u that the image u found was from 2014___but u replied with the supposed capture image to a post from someone who 'visited the store' (specific date)
If you r going 2 play ur game____at least b ethical and honest in ur posting!!!!!
You may finaly be onto something in a post. Every tax sale season opportunties present themselves.
The most opportune (as usual) will probably be found in closed end funds (CEF) where one can buy a port out of favor and in a negative NAV.
An example last 1/13 we bought 'RNP' a CEF in REIT and other preferreds __with reinvest as of 2day +25.47% (+18.78% on the security alone.) How many times hv u hrd of a 'potential' return like this in a preferred or bond investment??
As always there will be opps in sectors and related investments (due to tax selling and fund adjustments) that will present themselves.
At 1st I thought MPO was an OTC (understand they wld not hv exchange rules)__whence I chkd the tckr__they closed 2day at 2.98__with a 52 wk low $2.15
Are u ever going 2 post accurate info????
If u r replying 2 me__I did not short the mkt yesterday__u may b confusing me with mysize (or something like that).
I am on record as posting the indexes will be pushing to new HIs in mid 1st qtr__then corrective action and pushing again in the 2nd qtr.
There are six primary causes of a 'Bear mkt'__only two of them were getting stretched__and that quick hard (sector wise) correction brought them back to a normalized variance.
So far approx 80% of 3rd qtr corporate reporting has acheived or exceeded earnings expecs__the most important is where the guidance down-plays/ups are coming from. An analyst has to place these sector specific entities within the business cycle 'we have'______that my non-friend will tell you where the indexes will trend.
Those limits are from the exchanges itself. The only ones that could do what you are suggesting would be seat exchange member. It was the same in the 1920s that you posted about. Study the 'Series 7'!!
If you are referring to Google maps__that image capture is dated JUN 2012. To obtain a current satellite view (GPS) a person or business has to pay a rather hefty subscription fee.
The traders you are referring to in the 1920s were floor traders__you cannot enter electronic bids like you are posting about. Certainly you do not have a seat, lease a seat and could never pass the exams to get on the floor.
During one of the courses we offer we do put students on the floor after exchange close and run a recorded trading session to enable them to use hand signals and fill out the tickets for backroom order reconcile. However you could not even last in the class long enough to get to that point in the course__because you are a fawking idiot!
He/she posted about seriously putting in a bid for stocks such as Apple at $1. I have three equity brokerage accounts one that is internationally linked and also linked to commodity and Forex trading__I tried to put in a bid for Apple at $1 in all three__and received similar error messages from all three__Fidelity's is copied below.
(000906) The limit price you have entered is too far away from the Last Trade price for this security.
Please use the following guidelines when entering your limit price:
For buy limit orders in which your limit price is below the Last Trade price, your limit price can be no more than 50% away from the current Last Trade price.
For sell limit orders in which your limit price is above the Last Trade price, your limit price can be no more than 50% away from the current Last Trade price.
Again chumps proves he/she does not have a clue!!
For dr. chumps oft repeated claim that the markets are ‘very unstable’__as usual with chumps statements are posted that the actual facts dispute. Since 1970 the average October day variance is 0.92%__so far this month it is 1.05%.
Except for comic value chumps again continues to succeed in only providing mis-information!!