Sat, Jul 26, 2014, 12:07 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

NanoLogix Inc. Message Board

mojibes 8 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 10, 2014 12:31 PM Member since: Nov 3, 2007
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Won't Let it Run

    by badbilly12 Jul 9, 2014 5:43 PM
    mojibes mojibes Jul 10, 2014 12:31 PM Flag

    Just curious what you saw in that PR that makes you think the company should now be valued more than 13mil. (rhetorical question) It’s been too long and there isn't much for pump and dump manipulators to work with at this point. The patent may be worth something if they could show there where some demand, but it is yet to be shown that ANYONE is using this on a repeat basis for ANYTHING. A unknown NASA scientist liked the package, now they wait to hear from the agency. But does the packaging even add anything to the bottom line? I have my doubts. According to previous PRs many relevant Gov. agencies have already been looking at this over the years, now a congressman is needed to try and help sell it to them. It’s always been said here that you must read between the lines on this one. That"s my perspective, what did you see?

    You join the MB detractors by listing good reasons why this stock should be avoided, yet blame the other detractors when the share price didn't go up for anything other than another worthless PR. I completely agree with your last sentence and don't see any reason to look for another explanation to the PPS, or lack of interest shown in by the volume of trades. .

  • Reply to

    Nanologix News

    by rayludwiczak Jul 7, 2014 10:58 PM
    mojibes mojibes Jul 8, 2014 10:46 AM Flag

    Exactly, . I mean how many Petri dishes do you think it takes to supply the space station? Continuing that thought, anyone that wants the dish to last 2 or more years is not using very many, this isn't the customer that’s going to keep the lights on. Don’t know where this little blurb came from, hopefully it mentioned something about the package is only a bonus?

  • Reply to

    DOD EPA DOA Hospitals

    by julietnovember33 Jul 5, 2014 9:14 AM
    mojibes mojibes Jul 6, 2014 1:53 AM Flag

    Speculative? That may have been true.. At this I’d have to go with gamble.

  • Reply to

    Dead in the Water

    by scubagallager Jun 25, 2014 11:03 AM
    mojibes mojibes Jun 25, 2014 11:50 AM Flag

    Is it the CEO or the product? There was a time on this board when there was so much confidence in the product that the CEO didn't matter, his inexperience was not given any consideration. Fast-forward, after years of no progress I’ve repeatedly seen the blame given solely to the CEO. I’m certainly not defending the CEO. I’m just saying , perhaps the focus should remain where it was. At the very least it appears not to be the no brainer the mass mind on this board once thought.

  • mojibes mojibes Jun 15, 2014 4:42 PM Flag

    “ lets quit the semantics back and forth and just conclude the management is NOT supplying the financials as investors should expect them”

    How else but semantics could anyone defend something other then the painfully obvious. Your post seemed semantic, I’m thinking you expected semantics in return , but not in agreement.

  • mojibes mojibes Jun 12, 2014 6:04 PM Flag

    I never thought of that. you might be right.

  • we where concerned about climate change and seeding clouds at the same time.

  • Reply to

    "Supplied product" means what?

    by kjim27 Jun 5, 2014 4:11 PM
    mojibes mojibes Jun 9, 2014 7:23 PM Flag

    There was some good kool-aid going around back then. He no doubt regrets having drank some before that interview. .

0.1052+0.0002(+0.19%)Jul 25 3:56 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.