Tue, Sep 23, 2014, 10:37 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

NanoLogix Inc. Message Board

mojibes 7 posts  |  Last Activity: Sep 6, 2014 11:45 AM Member since: Nov 3, 2007
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    The Uneducated & Short Selling

    by nanofanboyyeahbaby Sep 4, 2014 11:45 PM
    mojibes mojibes Sep 6, 2014 11:45 AM Flag

    Good luck getting that one understood here, at one point I tried but the narrative was already set and the facts didn't fit. This subject was sort of a pet peeve of mine for some time, we should be able to get accurate accounting of transactions more often then every two weeks from FINA. As I recall there are at least 7 ways a transaction could be reported by brokers, most brokers don’t want to maintain a position in pink sheets so the Riskless Principal transaction you described is almost always used, there‘s a few ways that could be reported. There’s no way to know what the trade was, the FINRA daily short # is completely useless and I don’t see any reason for posting it, seems to do nothing but deceive.

    FINRA gets the Non-Tape Reports by end of day, why can’t that be posted overnight, or next day. (rhetorical), don’t get me started. Okay I’m done.

  • Reply to

    Future Timeline for NNLX

    by dlakersrok Aug 21, 2014 5:59 PM
    mojibes mojibes Aug 22, 2014 4:22 PM Flag

    Same timeline as three to five years ago, any day now. Where will it go?? I never saw it dominating the entire market as some here where claiming in the old days. Small niche or in the trash, and I think we’ll know which soon. Looks like the MMs spent the week getting ready for something. The gap down may indicate?? So little volume who knows, I must say this is a well behaved stock for so little interest.

  • Reply to

    Sales Figures

    by erickarther Aug 5, 2014 12:38 PM
    mojibes mojibes Aug 11, 2014 6:05 PM Flag

    And if you thought saying the sky is blue would hurt this stock you’d have an argument against that. Look up the Anatomy Of A Pump and Dump 2 on u-tube, this message board and chart are classic. You can look at the chart from the stone ages if you want but statistically this stock will continue to flounder indefinitely, even if the company succeeds.

  • Reply to

    Won't Let it Run

    by badbilly12 Jul 9, 2014 5:43 PM
    mojibes mojibes Jul 10, 2014 12:31 PM Flag

    Just curious what you saw in that PR that makes you think the company should now be valued more than 13mil. (rhetorical question) It’s been too long and there isn't much for pump and dump manipulators to work with at this point. The patent may be worth something if they could show there where some demand, but it is yet to be shown that ANYONE is using this on a repeat basis for ANYTHING. A unknown NASA scientist liked the package, now they wait to hear from the agency. But does the packaging even add anything to the bottom line? I have my doubts. According to previous PRs many relevant Gov. agencies have already been looking at this over the years, now a congressman is needed to try and help sell it to them. It’s always been said here that you must read between the lines on this one. That"s my perspective, what did you see?

    You join the MB detractors by listing good reasons why this stock should be avoided, yet blame the other detractors when the share price didn't go up for anything other than another worthless PR. I completely agree with your last sentence and don't see any reason to look for another explanation to the PPS, or lack of interest shown in by the volume of trades. .

  • Reply to

    Nanologix News

    by rayludwiczak Jul 7, 2014 10:58 PM
    mojibes mojibes Jul 8, 2014 10:46 AM Flag

    Exactly, . I mean how many Petri dishes do you think it takes to supply the space station? Continuing that thought, anyone that wants the dish to last 2 or more years is not using very many, this isn't the customer that’s going to keep the lights on. Don’t know where this little blurb came from, hopefully it mentioned something about the package is only a bonus?

  • Reply to

    DOD EPA DOA Hospitals

    by julietnovember33 Jul 5, 2014 9:14 AM
    mojibes mojibes Jul 6, 2014 1:53 AM Flag

    Speculative? That may have been true.. At this I’d have to go with gamble.

  • Reply to

    Dead in the Water

    by scubagallager Jun 25, 2014 11:03 AM
    mojibes mojibes Jun 25, 2014 11:50 AM Flag

    Is it the CEO or the product? There was a time on this board when there was so much confidence in the product that the CEO didn't matter, his inexperience was not given any consideration. Fast-forward, after years of no progress I’ve repeatedly seen the blame given solely to the CEO. I’m certainly not defending the CEO. I’m just saying , perhaps the focus should remain where it was. At the very least it appears not to be the no brainer the mass mind on this board once thought.

0.076-0.002(-2.56%)Sep 23 3:53 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.