Look at bullish/bearish posters in yahoo message board maybe can get you some ideas where the short term bottom is....
Live membership is for playing online multiplayer games. Doesn't mean they definitely will buy downloads. If internet is slow or has cap, most likely they will buy physical discs.
That means the short shares borrowed from Institutions are sold to institutions. The shorts are pretty steady -- IMO, most are part of inst. hedging strategy, some are retail shorts. If GME guides above $3.6 in 2016, you will see short squeezing from retail side (several millions)...Buy all you can.
$10? That means they will only earn much less than $2 in 2016. We will see in Mar CC. Good luck to you, too.
It takes about 2 months to meet with FDA and 6 months for FDA to make a decision. So at the end of this year, bbw could be chaged.
This bet is in my ira account. Plan to sell covered call weekly for 1-2% and collect annual divy 5%, make it total about 70% return yearly. Based on assumption that download speed and cap by certain internet providers will prevent digital going dominant. My investment strategy doesn't need this stock to go up from here. Only need not to drop too much. Also add batch on the downside cautiously....
Listen CC to see how much they spend each year -- 200 M. At the end of this year, they will do secondary. Pls go to nasdaqdotcom to see analysts forecast to 2018. No profit at all. Probably will need another round dilution at the end of 2018. Only hope is BO. So buy option to participate. That is all I am saying. Of course sales could be flying. So option is good in there, too.
If there is no BO, RLYP will need to dilute soon. Analysts estimate huge annual loss to 2018. No data for 2019. May need to sell secondary twice. Imagine what stock price will be. If sales is bad, this will be penny stock. Option can earn more return than stock and less downside risk.
billy - Frankly speaking, if there no BO by Mar 18, I don't think there will ever be. BTW, Jun call has more time value which will decay.
dude -- True but it is a limited risk. If there is BO, then you won't kick ur butt for not buying it.
2000% return if true. In the case of no BO, you just lose $1 per contract. No need to buy common stock. You can lose all your hard earned money.
Lurker can only understand bs pump such as "most de-risked stock" or "pawned my kid to buy".... We know what had happened in the end. Ouch!
Lurker -- Bought and recommend ESPR @ $104 "the most de-risked stock" from your mouth crashed to $13. Stocks are up and down but you're always a loser.
Reply to Warning by kiddo1428 •Oct 31, 2015 7:59 PM
stock_lurker • May 11, 2015 3:11 PM
did you get into espr? That is a perhaps the most de-risked stock out there. I am in and won't miss that one.
May 11, 2015 $104.30
Lurker -- I quote your words "pawned one kid and got some at 41.76 Please don't judge me; I plan to get the kid back once data is released,.." Fact: When data was released later, TTPH pps plunged to 8s. Isn't this a text book definition of Loser?
stock_lurker • Aug 6, 2015 3:19 PM Flag
1users liked this postsusers disliked this posts0Reply
c, and my spouse agreed to this. Also, Stifel raised TRGT to $57; Needham raised from 46 to 56, and Brean Capital boost price from 50 to 51.
justrook -- No, I don't think ZS has been approved as "best in class". Based on the ZS and Veltassa data available, it seems to me there is no knock out winner. Just ask a lot of bad scenarios here to make sure I don't miss anything.....
I have a friend that works for Merck in Rahway, NJ. I asked if she heard anything. She said "I heard we were interested, but not much more than that'".
If this is true, then I think every buyer wants to see if ZS would get 6-hour window, too. If zs got no black box, I am afraid no one will buy Veltassa.