I don't get it, if the buy price is at 9, can RAD stock goes higher than 9 while the deal is still going on? If that is the case, I can either have a $9/shr or I can sell it at a higher price before the deal is close, is that how it works?
If that happens, Shorts will get diarrhea all day tomorrow.
"Three things you shouldn't buy at RAD"
Question to the Fool, how many things you should not buy at Walmart and Costco? List that for me. A few months back another article said a few things you should not buy at Costco, Shrimp is one of them. They said that Costco sells Shrimp and fish imported from the third world countries that contaminated lead and a whole bunch of chemicals and diseases. They also said you should not buy BOOKS, DVD, CD, Perishables, Diapers, Laundry Detergent, Paper Goods from Costco, so does that mean you should buy those Costco items at RAD instead? Walmart got hit too then you should buy Walmart and Costco items at RAD.
Why do the analysts wait until it's too late to get in? Why do they wait until RAD breaks the resistance of $9 to give a buy signal when they can get in cheaper? This is what I don't get. See the news below.
Drugstore chain Rite Aid (RAD - Get Report) is showing traders a bounce of its own for technical reasons this afternoon.
Nearest Resistance: $9
Nearest Support: $8.25
Catalyst: Technical Setup
Rite Aid has been forming a bullish ascending triangle setup in the long-term, and it's getting close to triggering a buy signal with a breakout above $9. Shares are within 25 cents of that key resistance level as I write today.
If Rite Aid buyers can propel this stock above $9, it becomes buyable. Just keep a tight protective stop in place if you decide to jump into this retail pharmacy chain
"Cell phone BRANDS"? Just one boring, overpriced brand. Apple.
People buy this brand based on hype.
can Obama wear hijab in White house, can Police wear hijab at work.....why and why not? Don't tell me because they work for government, if that is the case then HER Judge and lawyers discriminate the private company policy. This lawsuit open up a whole slew of lawsuit against American business. Soon any 70 year old man or woman can file a lawsuit against Abercrombie & Fitch for age discrimination, a homeless could do that too. The company theme is to create their lifestyle brand not a Muslim life style brand. I remember my daughter worked for Gilly Hicks (A&F branch), she must wear the company outfits instead of using Manikin, Muslim head wear is not part of the company uniform. I don't know how she could win the case.
They can't just short short and short, at one point they have to give the shares back to you. The original high was 8.62 that means there is $1 for them to give you back plus 50% interest that they owe you. lol
Don't lie, you did stare at it when the first generation hit the market. For you all Japanese vehicles are POS, all GM cars are number 1 including the one made to Motor Trend Ignition Switch award.
Did anyone mark this post? Sure I did. As I said before, you know nothing. If the stock goes your way, you would like you are God "see I told you, you should listen to me". In this case you are a piece of junk like rotten trash. You are not a shortseller, probably an angry stock holder who trashes his own stock for comfort of losses.
You know nothing.
Oh Sure !
Low oil prices = Stock market crash
Good employment numbers = Raise interest rate = Stock market crash
Too good of something is no good for stock
Too bad of something is no good for stock
You don't need to formula to figure this one out
he has to give the RAD investors all the money back plus interests, penalties and fees. The high was over $8. They are waiting..... come on give them back their money.
This is funny. The guy who criticizing Cramer is the guy who recommended RAD and Cramer also recommended RAD. Since both of them recommended RAD, who is right?