If you can hold-on long enough things should turn around for you by 2016, imho only. If things don't turn around then we'll all lose money.
Thanks Allam. 1 million per/year would certainly help the bottom line. This company is spending 15 million per/year just to keep the lights on... It'd be nice to have some other automakers jump on the bandwagon.
Thanks vsop. If you haven't already done it you might want to put the loser troll Shanghaishark on ignore, he posts nothing of value to any long anyways, imho only :)
It's kinda fun watching all the "blank" postings the loser troll posts now that I have him on IGNORE lol!
Late Saturday night, the U.S. Senate passed a $1.1-trillion spending package to fund most of the federal government for the rest of the fiscal year. The vote count on the so-called “cromnibus” was a bipartisan 56-40.
A little more than $1.016 billion is allocated to USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) in the cromnibus — a compromise between the $1.005 billion and the $1.023 billion called for by the House and Senate agriculture appropriations bills, respectively.
The bill provides almost $2.6 billion in discretionary funding for the Food and Drug Administration, including $903 million for the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition and $147 million for the Center for Veterinary Medicine. This includes an increase of $27.5 million over 2014 enacted funding levels for food-safety activities, which is at least $2.5 million more than the House and Senate had added in their original agriculture appropriations.
The cromnibus also directs FSIS, in conjunction with other USDA agencies and FDA, “to support developing technologies that will provide rapid, portable, and facile screening of food fish species at port sites and wholesale and retail centers” in order to counter economic fraud and improve the safety of the country’s seafood supply.
And USDA and the U.S. Trade Representative will be required to make recommendations to Congress by May 1 on changes that must be made to bring country-of-origin labeling (COOL) for beef, pork and poultry into compliance with World Trade Organization obligations.
Under a different division of the bill — nearly $48 million of which goes toward food safety.
An increase of $8 million for food safety is for advancing diagnostic capabilities using DNA technology and enhancing surveillance, detection and prevention efforts at the state and local level.
Well Shang, what have you got to say for yourself? Coins? Prostitution? You certainly have been busy! LOL!
Sounds like the DOD and MDA didn't pay anything this quarter for the new research contracts. Sounds like the Company will need to wait until the announcement of the new mandates in 2016 before revenues increase. Story of this company: keep waiting.
Agreed! Give it up, speaking to Shang is like speaking to a three year old throwing a temper tantrum in the grocery store aisle. He posts total garbage, always wrong, and erases his past posts to try and make himself look good.
It's not about being right or wrong, it's about making money. Shang is bitter because he sold at a lost plain and simple.
100% agree that's why Shang is on IG!NORE. I'll bet he NEVER answers the question, I'll bet he just gives more boilerplate posting garbage of his chicken chocking bok bok cluck cluck mantra.
Hey Al, when you asked Shang to give you a number for this quarter's revenue you are under the erroneous assumption that the clown Shang has the ability of critical thinking and cognitive analysis to actually analyze the numbers. Instead of answering your question outright and straight forward the clown sends you on a hunting expedition of his past posting history.
From the nonsensical answer he gave in my tread he evades the question by pointing to his alter-ego "Stockfutures1" as his guiding light wherein he states the following:
stockfutures1 • Dec 13, 2014 10:01 AM
My Guess is $657,897 in Revenue with RED INK LOSES of $1,750,000.............................
Sentiment: Strong Sell
Shang posts at a 3rd grade level (at best) with his garbage posts using multiple IDs. IMO most of the time he is in the bathroom choking his chicken with his "bok bok cluck cluck" expressions. Don't expect a straight answer from this clown, he doesn't have a clue on how to play this stock. Shang is only good for juvenile language in his posts with the critical thinking ability of a 3rd grader. Until he grows up he is just a another clown lookIng for attention. He won't answer your question using his Shang ID because he is too afraid of being wrong, as usual.
If month to month payments then 1.4 is a good guess. Thanks, I never saw where the payments would be month to month, good to know.
What about the DOD and MDA revenues for the new research contracts? Do you think the Company was paid last quarter for these?
Shanghaishark is a known pathological liar who erases his past posts, uses multiple IDs to post, and adds no value to any long investor who believes in this company.
Good advice. Shang is back on ignore for me. Shang is a known pathological liar who erases his past posts, uses multiple IDs to post, and adds no value to any long investor who believes in this company.
No answers you because you're an idiot.
GOOGLE INC., Section 1. Authorized Shares nine billion (9,000,000,000) shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”), three billion (3,000,000,000) shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Amazon’s corporate charter states the company’s total authorized stock shall include 5 billion shares of common stock and 500 million shares of preferred stock.
WuXi PharmaTech (Cayman) Inc.: The authorized shares 5,002,500,000 shares of a par value of US$0.02 each.
Do you're own due diligence.
@kbc, this is the only life Shang has, he is on the MB 24/7, he has no life, the MBs are his life. Put him on ignore and get over it. Once you realize Shang is an idiot AND a pathological liar you'll put him on ignore like the rest of us.
Give it up @kbc and put Shang on ignore.
1) Shang won't read your post
2) Shang won't answer your post
3) Shang just repeats the same stupid statements
4) Shang is an idiot and a pathological liar, it's been proven time and time again!