Sun, Feb 1, 2015, 5:11 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

ZBB Energy Corporation Message Board

mulletman99 6 posts  |  Last Activity: Jan 27, 2015 1:49 PM Member since: Feb 1, 2008
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Presentations and revenue projections

    by mulletman99 Jan 25, 2015 9:27 AM
    mulletman99 mulletman99 Jan 27, 2015 1:49 PM Flag

    How long? Who the hell knows. If you are right about them not having any control on the speed of their trials, I guess they should ht their mark for analyzing and reporting the results. Didnt they say Q1?
    I think they can do P2 of BFPET much quicker at MassGen......IMO. SOOOOOOOOO many more fat people in Boston than in Belgium. Plus, they contracted with a first-rate CRO for this trial.

  • I noticed the CardioPET and PFPET revenue projections in their corporate presentations varied a LOT over the last couple presentations, so I wanted to compare. I noticed that although the summary page varied, the detailed slides dealing with the PET and revenue projections stayed constant, except for the following:

    5/16/14 presentation - CardioPET = $605Mil/yr; BFPET = $691Mil/yr
    12/12/14 presentation - CardioPET = $450Mil/yr; BFPET = $4BILLION/yr

    No changes in the numbers for the 1/13/15 and 1/23/15 presentations when you look at the detailed slides

    A little sloppy on their part, with the summary slides showing variable numbers, finally being corrected with the latest version to match the detailed slides.

    In summary, CardioPET projections have dropped by 25%, while the BFPET numbers have increased dramatically.....almost 9x.

    It looks like they need to start the BFPET phase 2 trial........RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!

    1 thing is apparent from looking at the old presentations........they cant seem to hit their own timeline projections. This needs to change if they want the pps to go up, which I assume they do.

    LETS GET THE BFPET P2 TRIAL STARTED ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • mulletman99 by mulletman99 Jan 2, 2015 10:51 AM Flag

    Using the same "bridge loan" to financing. Based on the language and history it looks like Platinum Partners was a least part of it, since it included tradeable shares of stock (last time it was Platinum giving them NAVB shares). If it is indeed Platinum, the fact that they are still supporting the stock and company is a good sign, IMO.


  • mulletman99 mulletman99 Dec 23, 2014 10:32 AM Flag

    Nah.....just like the baggers on this board, they out their heads in the sand and pretend like it never happened.

    I see things havent changed here. Toast posting common sense and logic and the board bagger (yes, as I have proven, its just one lonely lonely guy(girl?)) posting out of fear for the unknown, based on their sheltered white-bred life..

  • mulletman99 mulletman99 Dec 22, 2014 4:05 PM Flag

    Lets just hope that "there are no fat people in Belgium" was REALLY the reason for the trial delays.

    If the results get delayed, we will know it was company not country specific.

  • Reply to


    by letskeepontrack Nov 18, 2014 9:58 AM
    mulletman99 mulletman99 Nov 26, 2014 11:46 AM Flag

    Sunpower has historically used low concentration and silicon, instead Ge. Havent done any looking lately so they might be moving to HCPV......worth looking into if this is what keeps you invested here.

0.63-0.0200(-3.08%)Jan 30 4:02 PMEST

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.