Really? What didn't go wrong? Fda changed pathway and had special meeting one December due to political and pressure from competitors of sole source. It was all over tv and in the paper remember McCaskill? Plenty could change things like economic crash and an new administration that doesn't even say the word terrorist. More than 2 animal studies were needed and no guarantee this drug would make thru.
Every new biotech has high hopes for their new drug and puts high expectations and values on it to get investors. How actually last 3-5 years? How many actually get a drug to market? The whole game itself is speculative.
Everyone has an opinion mine is simply that award too speculative. I believe SC handed it back to parsons and said you can award expectation damages if you have expert testimony that shows award is not speculative. All the other siga pumptards that think this a lay up are a joke. Now same with pip pumptards I don't know which way it turns out. But no way SC has stated math is a go we love the formula.
You don't understand what I'm saying. I can't stand message board posters that post stupid things that pump up the other board morons. I'm not a shorter and I'm done with this conversation . My post about RP short you misunderstood
If the long lender is RP he is not selling. If he borrowed them they know where they cvv ome from and going to. Brokerage firms and clearing firms lend the shares. They make the $ from the lend not the client. I really don't care about this it's a mute point. I was sick of siga pumptards hyping everything. Just like pip pumptards.
99 An expectation damages award presupposes that the plaintiff can prove damages with
reasonable certainty. Callahan v. Rafail, 2001 WL 283012, at *1 (Del. Super. Mar. 16, 2001)
(citation omitted) (“It is well-settled law that ‘a recovery for lost profits will be allowed only if
their loss is capable of being proved, with a reasonable degree of certainty. No recovery can be
had for loss of profits which are determined to be uncertain, contingent, conjectural, or
Like the siga pumptards that get all excited about an RP buy I just threw it out about short to stem their giddiness. But I'm sure if he wanted to short against his position he could. I'm not sure if he even needs to file on that. But when a pip pumptard posts nonsense about SC and math I can't help myself. But if this is not based on a speculative formula why is pip even considering mediation? If SC says too speculative it gets flipped.