Did someone call you delusional? Or are you mixing up your handles? You are a pumptard. As bad as all those siga pumptards
It's not that you don't have to, you can't. And the very ugliness of this case is the reason I believe they hear appeal. By the way my stop loss is raised up again.
Go ahead and get those deals and then tell me with reasonable certainty what the profits would be. Those profits can be uncertain or contingent. Go for it
I bet I could Google that comic book and find someone who paid a set price for that asset. You can not do that in horse racing or biotech. The more you guys talk the more you prove speculation.
Interest has piled up because parsons failed on promissory first attempt. The range shows how speculative it is.
99 An expectation damages award presupposes that the plaintiff can prove damages with reasonable certainty. Callahan v. Rafail, 2001 WL 283012, at *1 (Del. Super. Mar. 16, 2001) (citation omitted) (“It is well-settled law that ‘a recovery for lost profits will be allowed only if their loss is capable of being proved, with a reasonable degree of certainty. No recovery can be had for loss of profits which are determined to be uncertain, contingent, conjectural, or speculative.’”).
So the answer to the question is yes? It was not an essay question. So to date the profits are still not determined.
I will say it again, you are delusional if you think siga has the ability to pull strings with barda and or fda. The thing that is important here is that this changes profits and could change again showing just how fragile and speculative profits are dealing in biotech and with this govt.
I'm confused you think siga calls the shots on dosage over fda and barda? They would allow a chapter 11 company to do that? You are delusional
Not into conspiracy theories it's a waste of time. You sound like the pumpers from the siga board of old. My stop loss moved up so unless big gap down this is now a profitable trade.