Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

NanoLogix, Inc. Message Board

nanofanboyyeahbaby 274 posts  |  Last Activity: Feb 6, 2016 10:49 AM Member since: Apr 17, 2014
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Everyone holding

    by rayludwiczak Feb 5, 2016 2:55 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Feb 6, 2016 10:49 AM Flag

    Lol. Prove it your accusations or F off, clown. You're here because you're either Bret or you blow him.

  • Reply to

    Everyone holding

    by rayludwiczak Feb 5, 2016 2:55 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Feb 6, 2016 1:17 AM Flag

    Yeah, I'm sure the wrinkled up prune face is a regular tough guy. You're extremely defensive of a person you claim invented anything. Lmao. Wonder why that is? Hmmm.

  • nanofanboyyeahbaby by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 28, 2016 7:20 PM Flag

    Here's a detailed look into what is commonly referred to as the 2010 pump.

    bit
    Dot
    ly
    Forwardslash
    1PDWsKj

  • nanofanboyyeahbaby by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 28, 2016 6:25 PM Flag

    2009 was a very interesting period for Nanologix. The following pdf provides insight into the causes and effects of what might have led to the $1.00+ per share in price. More to follow.

    bit
    Dot
    ly
    Forwardslash
    1PWtIwB

  • Reply to

    New (old) Financials

    by tahonixx Jan 27, 2016 3:59 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 27, 2016 5:44 PM Flag

    Yes sir, you are..

  • Reply to

    New (old) Financials

    by tahonixx Jan 27, 2016 3:59 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 27, 2016 4:24 PM Flag

    "The company has posted new financial documents to the web. They're old, but at least it's something."

    Uh, those statement aren't newly posted. They've been on the website for over a year, lol.

  • Reply to

    Cash Flow

    by rayludwiczak Jan 26, 2016 11:56 AM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 26, 2016 2:16 PM Flag

    Any cash that the company has is insignifant. We know this because 1. The company has always made their financial filings available, and couldn't wait to do so, when they believed they had exciting information to share like the Christmas email and referring to the 2014 financials as a "gift" when really it was a disappointment. 2. Once you've obtained $10 million in assets, you are no longer a pink sheet company, with the exception of foreign ADR's. Why is it so difficult for a company that has touted itself as the "gold standard" with a market potential in excess of $50 Billion to obtain a measly $10 Million?

    In any event, right now they're probably more concerned with digging deep into their pockets trying to scrounge up enough change just to pay off their back taxes than to worry about actual work.

  • Reply to

    2016 a good start !!

    by kphone2000 Jan 11, 2016 10:24 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 15, 2016 1:22 AM Flag

    Badbilly is an illogical moron. Just ignore the idiot.

  • nanofanboyyeahbaby by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 12, 2016 12:13 PM Flag

    Told ya.

  • nanofanboyyeahbaby by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 12, 2016 4:45 AM Flag

    An examination of the integrity of enthusiastic Prius owner, Kphone2000 (aka PriusHybrid1), Ken Williams:

    October 14, 2012: "the best information we do have is that sales are happening. Kphone visited, and was told that multiple orders are being processed. Unless he's mistaken, lying, or was lied to, this means that Q3 is already a record quarter for sales."

    Facts: Revenues for Q3 2012 were $63,908. Q3 2013 produced $16,466 in revenue.

    Conclusion: Any revenue will produce a "record year" when your basis is zero. Revenue was not sustainable the following year.

    July 29, 2013: "not many want to sell at these prices, change for the better is happening, share price will improve to the upside in the not so distant future."

    Facts: NNLX shares traded for $0.12 on that day. They are now trading for $0.05, a 58.33% loss.

    March 12, 2013: "We have management that understands what needs to be done, to be successful. Yes, sales are important and they are increasing as we gain exposure ....... just a few more months in my opinion. Don't be surprised if we have a sudden breakout one day soon. :)"

    Facts: Revenues for the entire year of 2013 were $35,598, nearly 1/3rd of the previous year. On March 12th, shares were trading for $0.22. There was a breakout - it just went the opposite way; losing 77.27% of its share price.

    Sept. 17, 2012: "The order of 12k that was mentioned in a PR, has shipped, along with follow on orders. And other orders as well. 'follow on orders' translation means the product did what it was intended to do they liked it and ordered more! At the end of June they had $184K cash and they are selling product. So at a minimum issuing more shares will be ending soon. IMO"

    Facts: At the end of June, they had $178,185 of cash (apparently kphone became confused of the difference between "cash" and "prepaid expenses". The money was due to the selling of PIPE shares, not an increase in sales. Revenue was only $510.00. Shares have increase 14.75% since then.

  • Reply to

    2016 a good start !!

    by kphone2000 Jan 11, 2016 10:24 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 12, 2016 3:27 AM Flag

    Well let's hope so Mr. Williams, however, I find it interesting that you say you talked to the CEO about this issue and came to the conclusion that it is "no big deal" just because the amount is "about" $500. So you have no problem with people being late on their bills? Personally, I find it unacceptable. If the Assumed Par Value Capital Method is used to pay the franchise tax bill, the bill is $543.47. If they would have paid their bill on time, they would have only spent $350. So it cost the company an additional $193.47, or 55%, because the CEO wasn't responsible and timely with managing the affairs of the company. And, you're ok with that because it's "not a big deal".

    Not paying your bills on time might be a normal activity for you, Ken, but it isn't an accepted practice for responsible people. I'm unimpressed with your response and it reveals an incredible character flaw that you share with idiots such as Zag, which I have no doubt zigzags around his bills too.

    In any event, if he's current, he wasn't 12 days ago and you can thank me for getting him off his lazy bleep to pay his bills.

    Lastly, you've remarked that "this is the break-out year" several times over the course of several years. I don't know how anyone could possibly take your opinions seriously. You have to integrity.

  • Reply to

    The document that scares Zagendaizgud

    by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 11:36 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 11, 2016 8:09 PM Flag

    I really don't think anybody cares what you say, to be honest. December 31, 2015 (12 days ago) isn't an outdated document. Go on somewhere.

  • Reply to

    The document that scares Zagendaizgud

    by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 11:36 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 11, 2016 6:58 PM Flag

    That's that's crazy. Great use of logic. I'm gonna sell everything I own to buy stock in a company that makes no money and issues exorbitant amounts of stock grants to a CEO who never holds a shareholders meeting or pays his franchise taxes. That's what I'll do!

  • Reply to

    The document that scares Zagendaizgud

    by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 11:36 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 11, 2016 6:56 PM Flag

    It's from December 31st. Hardly outdated. First, you said it wasn't true. Then, you said it was a fake. Now, you're saying its outdated. You're struggling to create an argument, son.

  • nanofanboyyeahbaby by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 11:36 PM Flag

    docdro
    Dot
    id
    Forwardslash
    zceQ7Wg

  • Reply to

    Good Luck

    by coalpilejohnny Jan 5, 2016 9:25 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 11:28 PM Flag

    You probably don't even have the $20 it takes to purchase the document, lol. I bet that's the real issue. Are you the moron that trades 50 shares every so often? Have you really blown all your money? It's clear you don't know how to value a business. That's waaaayyyyy above your pay-grade.

  • Reply to

    Good Luck

    by coalpilejohnny Jan 5, 2016 9:25 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 11:25 PM Flag

    checkmate??? what exactly are you claiming checkmate on? You challenge me to produce a document. You then say you paid $20 for the same document. Yet, I'm the only one that produces the document. Nobody knows you, dude. You have no credibility. You've never said anything remotely intelligent about this company and you can't provide proof for anything you say you have proof of. You're a bozo. F off already, dorkus.

  • Reply to

    Good Luck

    by coalpilejohnny Jan 5, 2016 9:25 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 9:59 PM Flag

    So just "take your word"? Is that your final answer? Lmao, idiot.

  • nanofanboyyeahbaby by nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 9:45 PM Flag

    Nanoinvestornine: "How's your bogus claim about NNLX owing $300+ thousand to Delaware? You're such a purveyor of lies. I'm surprised that Sykes fellow didn't put you in prison where you belong."

    Me: "I never said that Nanologix owes Delaware $300,000. That's what Delaware has on file. I do t work for Delaware, I didn't create the document. What I said is that Nanologix is delinquent on their annual franchise filing and their franchise tax. Only they and Delaware know what that amount is and currently that amount is indicated by the state treasurer of Delaware to be over $300,000. If you have an issue with that, take it up with them because that's what is printed on their state governments website."

    Zagendaizgud: "No it's not, you moron"

    Me: "Yes it is, you liar."

    Zagendaizgud: "Prove it you possessed demonic demented lying moron. I spent the $20 and found they are current."

    Me: "This will be the 3rd time I've "proved it" lol. Now let's see your proof.
    docdro
    Dot
    id
    Forwardslash
    zceQ7Wg"

    Zagendaizgud: "EvilDemonSpawn, your file is incorrect. Did you counterfeit it? Delaware's not going to take that well --- you falsifying documents. Whenever you post your bs you lower the IQ of all the Yahoo boards. So sad"

    Me: "Does that accusation usually work for you and help you get out of showing your proof? Lmao. I don't think people will read this conversation and come to any other conclusion besides the fact that you're a mentally disturbed individual with very little business practice.

    Clearly, you're not going to provide the document you claim to have that shows Nanologix isn't delinquent. Shall we just "take your word"? F off adolescent. You're blocked."

    Since this exchange, zag has not provided the document he says he paid for that shows Nanologix is current. One day, this fraudulent stock manipulator will get caught. I guarantee it.

  • Reply to

    Good Luck

    by coalpilejohnny Jan 5, 2016 9:25 PM
    nanofanboyyeahbaby nanofanboyyeahbaby Jan 10, 2016 9:20 PM Flag

    Does that accusation usually work for you and help you get out of showing your proof? Lmao. I don't think people will read this conversation and come to any other conclusion besides the fact that you're a mentally disturbed individual with very little business practice.

    Clearly, you're not going to provide the document you claim to have that shows Nanologix isn't delinquent. Shall we just "take your word"? F off adolescent. You're blocked.

NNLX
0.0556-0.0044(-7.33%)Feb 5 2:45 PMEST